Literature DB >> 25570335

Characterizing touch using pressure data and auto regressive models.

Shlomi Laufer, Carla M Pugh, Barry D Van Veen.   

Abstract

Palpation plays a critical role in medical physical exams. Despite the wide range of exams, there are several reproducible and subconscious sets of maneuvers that are common to examination by palpation. Previous studies by our group demonstrated the use of manikins and pressure sensors for measuring and quantifying how physicians palpate during different physical exams. In this study we develop mathematical models that describe some of these common maneuvers. Dynamic pressure data was measured using a simplified testbed and different autoregressive models were used to describe the motion of interest. The frequency, direction and type of motion used were identified from the models. We believe these models can a provide better understanding of how humans explore objects in general and more specifically give insights to understand medical physical exams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25570335      PMCID: PMC4288476          DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6943967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  9 in total

1.  The effect of simulator use on learning and self-assessment: the case of Stanford University's E-Pelvis simulator.

Authors:  C M Pugh; S Srivastava; R Shavelson; D Walker; T Cotner; B Scarloss; M Kuo; C Rawn; P Dev; T H Krummel; L H Heinrichs
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2001

2.  Stages of manual exploration in haptic object identification.

Authors:  R L Klatzky; S J Lederman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-12

3.  Lost in translation: unfolding medical students' misconceptions of how to perform a clinical digital rectal examination.

Authors:  Rishi Balkissoon; Katherine Blossfield; Lawrence Salud; Debra Ford; Carla Pugh
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  How to do and interpret a rectal examination in gastroenterology.

Authors:  Nicholas J Talley
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  A simulation-based assessment of clinical breast examination technique: do patient and clinician factors affect clinician approach?

Authors:  Carla M Pugh; Zachary B Domont; Lawrence H Salud; Katherine M Blossfield
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Use of sensor technology to explore the science of touch.

Authors:  Lawrence H Salud; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2011

7.  Hand movements: a window into haptic object recognition.

Authors:  S J Lederman; R L Klatzky
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Clinical breast examination: practical recommendations for optimizing performance and reporting.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Judy Hannan; Janet Osuch; Marianne H Alciati; Cornelia Baines; Mary Barton; Janet Kay Bobo; Cathy Coleman; Mary Dolan; Ginny Gaumer; Daniel Kopans; Susan Kutner; Dorothy S Lane; Herschel Lawson; Helen Meissner; Candace Moorman; Henry Pennypacker; Peggy Pierce; Eva Sciandra; Robert Smith; Ralph Coates
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Multimodality approach to classifying hand utilization for the clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Shlomi Laufer; Elaine R Cohen; Anne-Lise D Maag; Calvin Kwan; Barry Vanveen; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2014
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.