Literature DB >> 22803019

A survey of digital rectal examination training in Canadian medical schools.

Alysha Nensi1, Nilesh Chande.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The digital rectal examination (DRE) is important for the diagnosis of a variety of gastrointestinal, urological and gynecological disorders. However, it appears that Canadian medical students may not be adequately taught nor provided the opportunity to practice their skills often enough. The present study was an analysis of the current practices in DRE teaching and evaluation in undergraduate medicine programs across Canada.
METHODS: Clinical skills coordinators from the 14 English-speaking medical schools in Canada were invited to participate in the survey and to respond to questions regarding DRE teaching at their respective schools.
RESULTS: Thirteen of the 14 schools (93%) responded to the survey. The DRE is taught in various ways: 69% of schools use anatomical rectal models, 62% use video tutorials and 62% involve physician instruction. Most schools (85%) offer one formal teaching session before clerkship. Generally, there is no formal DRE teaching session during clerkship. Preclerkship students in 62% of the schools perform <=1 DRE during their training, and clinical skills coordinators in 85% of the schools expected that clerkship students perform <=2. The training is evaluated in a variety of ways, with most schools (77%) only requiring mandatory attendance. DISCUSSION: Although a variety of techniques are used to teach and evaluate DRE training in Canadian medical schools, students are performing very few DREs before graduation. Medical schools should objectively evaluate proficiency to give meaningful feedback and improve competence in their students as well as provide more opportunities for students to obtain the necessary experience performing DREs during their clinical training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22803019      PMCID: PMC3395445          DOI: 10.1155/2012/681357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0835-7900            Impact factor:   3.522


  11 in total

1.  Can medical schools rely on clerkships to train students in basic clinical skills?

Authors:  R Remmen; A Derese; A Scherpbier; J Denekens; I Hermann; C van der Vleuten; P Van Royen; L Bossaert
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  When questionnaire response rates do matter: a survey of general practitioners and their views of NHS changes.

Authors:  D Armstrong; M Ashworth
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Teaching digital rectal examinations to medical students: an evaluation study of teaching methods.

Authors:  Cathy Popadiuk; Madge Pottle; Vernon Curran
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Influence of undergraduate teaching on medical students' attitudes to rectal examination.

Authors:  T W Hennigan; P J Franks; D B Hocken; T G Allen-Mersh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-04-06

5.  Lost in translation: unfolding medical students' misconceptions of how to perform a clinical digital rectal examination.

Authors:  Rishi Balkissoon; Katherine Blossfield; Lawrence Salud; Debra Ford; Carla Pugh
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  A model teaching session for the hypothesis-driven physical examination.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nishigori; Kozo Masuda; Makoto Kikukawa; Atsushi Kawashima; Rachel Yudkowsky; Georges Bordage; Junji Otaki
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 3.650

7.  Maximising student preparation for clinical teaching placements.

Authors:  Amanda Barnard; Cathy Owen; Alexandra Tyson; Sarah Martin
Journal:  Clin Teach       Date:  2011-06

8.  Documentation of rectal examination performance in the clinical teaching unit of a university hospital.

Authors:  H J Freeman
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.522

9.  Are doctors examining prostates in university hospital?

Authors:  Chin Hong Lim; David M Quinlan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Digital rectal examination for prostate cancer: attitude and experience of final year medical students.

Authors:  K Dakum; V M Ramyil; S Agbo; E Ogwuche; B S Makama; A T Kidmas
Journal:  Niger J Clin Pract       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 0.968

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Digital Rectal Examination for Prostate Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Leen Naji; Harkanwal Randhawa; Zahra Sohani; Brittany Dennis; Deanna Lautenbach; Owen Kavanagh; Monica Bawor; Laura Banfield; Jason Profetto
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Occult Blood and Perianal Examination: Value Added in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Screening.

Authors:  Harland S Winter; Peter T Masiakos; Christopher J Moran; Jess L Kaplan
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.839

3.  Implementation and utilization of gynecological teaching associate and male urogenital teaching associate programs: a scoping review.

Authors:  Holly Hopkins; Chelsea Weaks; Elise Napier
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2021-05-20

4.  The association of standardized patient educators (ASPE) gynecological teaching associate (GTA) and male urogenital teaching associate (MUTA) standards of best practice.

Authors:  Holly Hopkins; Chelsea Weaks; Tim Webster; Melih Elcin
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-21

5.  Medical students' experiences learning intimate physical examination skills: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Andra M Dabson; Parker J Magin; Gaynor Heading; Dimity Pond
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.463

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.