Literature DB >> 19306059

Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions by mechanical imaging.

Vladimir Egorov1, Thomas Kearney, Stanley B Pollak, Chand Rohatgi, Noune Sarvazyan, Suren Airapetian, Stephanie Browning, Armen Sarvazyan.   

Abstract

Mechanical imaging yields tissue elasticity map and provides quantitative characterization of a detected pathology. The changes in the surface stress patterns as a function of applied load provide information about the elastic composition and geometry of the underlying tissue structures. The objective of this study is the clinical evaluation of breast mechanical imager for breast lesion characterization and differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. The breast mechanical imager includes a probe with pressure sensor array, an electronic unit providing data acquisition from the pressure sensors and communication with a touch-screen laptop computer. We have developed an examination procedure and algorithms to provide assessment of breast lesion features such as hardness related parameters, mobility, and shape. A statistical Bayesian classifier was constructed to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions by utilizing all the listed features as the input. Clinical results for 179 cases, collected at four different clinical sites, have demonstrated that the breast mechanical imager provides a reliable image formation of breast tissue abnormalities and calculation of lesion features. Malignant breast lesions (histologically confirmed) demonstrated increased hardness and strain hardening as well as decreased mobility and longer boundary length in comparison with benign lesions. Statistical analysis of differentiation capability for 147 benign and 32 malignant lesions revealed an average sensitivity of 91.4% and specificity of 86.8% with a standard deviation of +/-6.1%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve characterizing benign and malignant lesion discrimination is 86.1% with the confidence interval ranging from 80.3 to 90.9%, with a significance level of P = 0.0001 (area = 50%). The multisite clinical study demonstrated the capability of mechanical imaging for characterization and differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. We hypothesize that the breast mechanical imager has the potential to be used as a cost effective device for cancer diagnostics that could reduce the benign biopsy rate, serve as an adjunct to mammography and to be utilized as a screening device for breast cancer detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19306059      PMCID: PMC2803347          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0369-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  30 in total

1.  Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging--clinical experience of multiple observers.

Authors:  Dawn M Regner; Gina K Hesley; Nicholas J Hangiandreou; Marilyn J Morton; Michelle R Nordland; Duane D Meixner; Timothy J Hall; Michael A Farrell; Jayawant N Mandrekar; W Scott Harmsen; J William Charboneau
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Timothy J Hall; Amy M Sommer; Gina K Hesley; Gale A Sisney; William E Svensson; Jason P Fine; Jinfeng Jiang; Nicholas J Hangiandreou
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Breast MRI: state of the art.

Authors:  Fauzia Q Vandermeer; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.176

Review 4.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Performance and reporting of clinical breast examination: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Sharon McDonald; Debbie Saslow; Marianne H Alciati
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  Clinical breast examination: practical recommendations for optimizing performance and reporting.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Judy Hannan; Janet Osuch; Marianne H Alciati; Cornelia Baines; Mary Barton; Janet Kay Bobo; Cathy Coleman; Mary Dolan; Ginny Gaumer; Daniel Kopans; Susan Kutner; Dorothy S Lane; Herschel Lawson; Helen Meissner; Candace Moorman; Henry Pennypacker; Peggy Pierce; Eva Sciandra; Robert Smith; Ralph Coates
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 7.  MRI in the detection and management of breast cancer.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Mei-Lin W Ah-See; Andreas Makris
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.512

8.  Findings from 752,081 clinical breast examinations reported to a national screening program from 1995 through 1998.

Authors:  J K Bobo; N C Lee; S F Thames
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-06-21       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging.

Authors:  Mickael Tanter; Jeremy Bercoff; Alexandra Athanasiou; Thomas Deffieux; Jean-Luc Gennisson; Gabriel Montaldo; Marie Muller; Anne Tardivon; Mathias Fink
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  [Application of real-time tissue elastography in diagnosis of breast cancer].

Authors:  Xiu-fang Zhang; Xue-ming Liu; Xiao-feng Bao; Xian-jing Peng; Wen Zhang; Jun Xu
Journal:  Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2006-07
View more
  14 in total

1.  Harmonic Motion Imaging (HMI) for Tumor Imaging and Treatment Monitoring.

Authors:  Elisa E Konofagou; Caroline Maleke; Jonathan Vappou
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2012

2.  AN OVERVIEW OF ELASTOGRAPHY - AN EMERGING BRANCH OF MEDICAL IMAGING.

Authors:  Armen Sarvazyan; Timothy J Hall; Matthew W Urban; Mostafa Fatemi; Salavat R Aglyamov; Brian S Garra
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2011-11

3.  Development of array piezoelectric fingers towards in vivo breast tumor detection.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Youngsoo Chung; Ari D Brooks; Wei-Heng Shih; Wan Y Shih
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.523

4.  Vaginal tactile imaging.

Authors:  Vladimir Egorov; Heather van Raalte; Armen P Sarvazyan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Mechanical Imaging - a Technology for 3-D Visualization and Characterization of Soft Tissue Abnormalities. A Review.

Authors:  A Sarvazyan; V Egorov
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2012-02-01

6.  Feasibility of spatial frequency-domain imaging for monitoring palpable breast lesions.

Authors:  Constance M Robbins; Guruprasad Raghavan; James F Antaki; Jana M Kainerstorfer
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  A model study of 3-dimensional localization of breast tumors using piezoelectric fingers of different probe sizes.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Wei-Heng Shih; Wan Y Shih
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.523

8.  Enhanced resting-state dynamics of the hemoglobin signal as a novel biomarker for detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Harry L Graber; Rabah Al abdi; Yong Xu; Armand P Asarian; Peter J Pappas; Lisa Dresner; Naresh Patel; Kuppuswamy Jagarlamundi; William B Solomon; Randall L Barbour
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Mechanical imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Vladimir Egorov; Armen P Sarvazyan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Study of quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging in the diagnosis of breast tumours.

Authors:  Zhi Li Wang; Jun Lai Li; Min Li; Yan Huang; Wen Bo Wan; Jie Tang
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.