Literature DB >> 28040934

Development of array piezoelectric fingers towards in vivo breast tumor detection.

Xin Xu1, Youngsoo Chung1, Ari D Brooks2, Wei-Heng Shih3, Wan Y Shih1.   

Abstract

We have investigated the development of a handheld 4 × 1 piezoelectric finger (PEF) array breast tumor detector system towards in vivo patient testing, particularly, on how the duration of the DC applied voltage, the depression depth of the handheld unit, and breast density affect the PEF detection sensitivity on 40 patients. The tests were blinded and carried out in four phases: with DC voltage durations 5, 3, 2, to 0.8 s corresponding to scanning a quadrant, a half, a whole breast, and both breasts within 30 min, respectively. The results showed that PEF detection sensitivity was unaffected by shortening the applied voltage duration from 5 to 0.8 s nor was it affected by increasing the depression depth from 2 to 6 mm. Over the 40 patients, PEF detected 46 of the 48 lesions (46/48)-with the smallest lesion detected being 5 mm in size. Of 28 patients (some have more than one lesion) with mammography records, PEF detected 31/33 of all lesions (94%) and 14/15 of malignant lesions (93%), while mammography detected 30/33 of all lesions (91%) and 12/15 of malignant lesions (80%), indicating that PEF could detect malignant lesions not detectable by mammography without significantly increasing false positives. PEF's detection sensitivity is also shown to be independent of breast density, suggesting that PEF could be a potential tool for detecting breast cancer in young women and women with dense breasts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28040934      PMCID: PMC5148765          DOI: 10.1063/1.4971325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum        ISSN: 0034-6748            Impact factor:   1.523


  49 in total

Review 1.  Is clinical breast examination an acceptable alternative to mammographic screening?

Authors:  I Mittra; M Baum; H Thornton; J Houghton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-28

2.  Inclusion mechanical property estimation using tactile images, finite element method, and artificial neural network.

Authors:  Jong-Ha Lee; Chang-Hee Won
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

3.  Little Progress in How To Advise Women With Dense Breasts.

Authors:  Judy Peres
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Measurement of the hyperelastic properties of 44 pathological ex vivo breast tissue samples.

Authors:  Joseph J O'Hagan; Abbas Samani
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Johanna M Rommens; Kelly Vogt; Vivian Lee; John L Hopper; Martin J Yaffe; Andrew D Paterson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  An inverse problem solution for measuring the elastic modulus of intact ex vivo breast tissue tumours.

Authors:  Abbas Samani; Donald Plewes
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Constantine Gatsonis; Christiane K Kuhl; R Edward Hendrick; Etta D Pisano; Lucy Hanna; Sue Peacock; Stanley F Smazal; Daniel D Maki; Thomas B Julian; Elizabeth R DePeri; David A Bluemke; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United States.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Ronald E Gangnon; Veronica Burt; Amy Trentham-Dietz; John M Hampton; Robert D Wellman; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts.

Authors:  Pavel Crystal; Selwyn D Strano; Semyon Shcharynski; Michael J Koretz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions.

Authors:  Hui Zhi; Bing Ou; Bao-Ming Luo; Xia Feng; Yan-Ling Wen; Hai-Yun Yang
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  3 in total

1.  A model study of 3-dimensional localization of breast tumors using piezoelectric fingers of different probe sizes.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Wei-Heng Shih; Wan Y Shih
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.523

Review 2.  Bio-piezoelectricity: fundamentals and applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Nagwa Ahmed Kamel
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 3.  Early Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Lulu Wang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.