Literature DB >> 19933214

TCDD and a putative endogenous AhR ligand, ITE, elicit the same immediate changes in gene expression in mouse lung fibroblasts.

Ellen C Henry1, Stephen L Welle, Thomas A Gasiewicz.   

Abstract

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), a ligand-dependent transcription factor, mediates toxicity of several classes of xenobiotics and also has important physiological roles in differentiation, reproduction, and immunity, although the endogenous ligand(s) mediating these functions is/are as yet unidentified. One candidate endogenous ligand, 2-(1'H-indolo-3'-carbonyl)-thiazole-4-carboxylic acid methyl ester (ITE), is a potent AhR agonist in vitro, activates the murine AhR in vivo, but does not induce toxicity. We hypothesized that ITE and the toxic ligand, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), may modify transcription of different sets of genes to account for their different toxicity. To test this hypothesis, primary mouse lung fibroblasts were exposed to 0.5muM ITE, 0.2nM TCDD, or vehicle for 4 h, and total gene expression was evaluated using microarrays. After this short-term and low-dose treatment, several hundred genes were changed significantly, and the response to ITE and TCDD was remarkably similar, both qualitatively and quantitatively. Induced gene sets included the expected battery of AhR-dependent xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes, as well as several sets that reflect the inflammatory role of lung fibroblasts. Real time quantitative RT-qPCR assay of several selected genes confirmed these microarray data and further suggested that there may be kinetic differences in expression between ligands. These data suggest that ITE and TCDD elicit an analogous change in AhR conformation such that the initial transcription response is the same. Furthermore, if the difference in toxicity between TCDD and ITE is mediated by differences in gene expression, then it is likely that secondary changes enabled by the persistent TCDD, but not by the shorter lived ITE, are responsible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19933214      PMCID: PMC2819971          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  38 in total

1.  A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR.

Authors:  M W Pfaffl
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Preprocessing of oligonucleotide array data.

Authors:  Zhijin Wu; Rafael A Irizarry
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Comparative analysis of dioxin response elements in human, mouse and rat genomic sequences.

Authors:  Y V Sun; D R Boverhof; L D Burgoon; M R Fielden; T R Zacharewski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  A ligand for the aryl hydrocarbon receptor isolated from lung.

Authors:  Jiasheng Song; Margaret Clagett-Dame; Richard E Peterson; Mark E Hahn; William M Westler; Rafal R Sicinski; Hector F DeLuca
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The human estrogen receptor-alpha is a ubiquitinated protein whose stability is affected differentially by agonists, antagonists, and selective estrogen receptor modulators.

Authors:  A L Wijayaratne; D P McDonnell
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-07-25       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Aromatic hydrocarbon receptor-driven Bax gene expression is required for premature ovarian failure caused by biohazardous environmental chemicals.

Authors:  T Matikainen; G I Perez; A Jurisicova; J K Pru; J J Schlezinger; H Y Ryu; J Laine; T Sakai; S J Korsmeyer; R F Casper; D H Sherr; J L Tilly
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Dioxin-responsive AHRE-II gene battery: identification by phylogenetic footprinting.

Authors:  Paul C Boutros; Ivy D Moffat; Monique A Franc; Nathalie Tijet; Jouko Tuomisto; Raimo Pohjanvirta; Allan B Okey
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 8.  Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor by structurally diverse exogenous and endogenous chemicals.

Authors:  Michael S Denison; Scott R Nagy
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 13.820

9.  Analysis of estrogen receptor function in vitro reveals three distinct classes of antiestrogens.

Authors:  D P McDonnell; D L Clemm; T Hermann; M E Goldman; J W Pike
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  1995-06

10.  Genomewide analysis of aryl hydrocarbon receptor binding targets reveals an extensive array of gene clusters that control morphogenetic and developmental programs.

Authors:  Maureen A Sartor; Michael Schnekenburger; Jennifer L Marlowe; John F Reichard; Ying Wang; Yunxia Fan; Ci Ma; Saikumar Karyala; Danielle Halbleib; Xiangdong Liu; Mario Medvedovic; Alvaro Puga
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  22 in total

1.  Comparisons of differential gene expression elicited by TCDD, PCB126, βNF, or ICZ in mouse hepatoma Hepa1c1c7 cells and C57BL/6 mouse liver.

Authors:  Rance Nault; Agnes L Forgacs; Edward Dere; Timothy R Zacharewski
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 2.  Retinoid-xenobiotic interactions: the Ying and the Yang.

Authors:  Igor O Shmarakov
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  Genome-Wide Transcriptional Analysis Reveals Novel AhR Targets That Regulate Dendritic Cell Function during Influenza A Virus Infection.

Authors:  Anthony M Franchini; Jason R Myers; Guang-Bi Jin; David M Shepherd; B Paige Lawrence
Journal:  Immunohorizons       Date:  2019-06-17

4.  Novel cellular targets of AhR underlie alterations in neutrophilic inflammation and inducible nitric oxide synthase expression during influenza virus infection.

Authors:  Jennifer L Head Wheeler; Kyle C Martin; B Paige Lawrence
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Is chronic AhR activation by rapidly metabolized ligands safe for the treatment of immune-mediated diseases?

Authors:  Allison K Ehrlich; Nancy I Kerkvliet
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2017-02-01

Review 6.  The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor: A Key Bridging Molecule of External and Internal Chemical Signals.

Authors:  Jijing Tian; Yu Feng; Hualing Fu; Heidi Qunhui Xie; Joy Xiaosong Jiang; Bin Zhao
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Exposure to Heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HpCDD) Regulates microRNA Expression in Human Lung Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Collynn F Woeller; Thomas H Thatcher; Juilee Thakar; Adam Cornwell; Matthew R Smith; Dean P Jones; Philip K Hopke; Patricia J Sime; Pamela Krahl; Timothy M Mallon; Richard P Phipps; Mark J Utell
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.162

8.  Dioxin and estrogen signaling in lung adenocarcinoma cells with different aryl hydrocarbon receptor/estrogen receptor α phenotypes.

Authors:  Lun-Cheng Kuo; Li-Chuan Cheng; Chun-Ju Lin; Lih-Ann Li
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.914

9.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells alters cell function and pathway-specific gene modulation reflecting changes in cellular trafficking and migration.

Authors:  Fanny L Casado; Kameshwar P Singh; Thomas A Gasiewicz
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 4.436

10.  Differential consequences of two distinct AhR ligands on innate and adaptive immune responses to influenza A virus.

Authors:  Jennifer L H Wheeler; Kyle C Martin; Emily Resseguie; B Paige Lawrence
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.