Literature DB >> 19298037

Leg length discrepancy, dislocation rate, and offset in total hip replacement using a short modular stem: navigation vs conventional freehand.

Norberto Confalonieri1, Alfonso Manzotti, Fabrizio Montironi, Chris Pullen.   

Abstract

We present a match-paired study between computer-assisted and freehand techniques using a short modular femoral stem (Metha; B. Braun Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) in total hip replacement (THR). Surgical time, clinical outcome, dislocation rate, limb length, and offset in 44 patients with ideal indication for this more conservative implant were assessed. Despite both longer surgical time and similar early outcomes, the results showed how computer-assisted techniques allow easier management of limb length discrepancy and offset restoring. We believe that navigated short modular stems are safe for less invasive THR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19298037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  11 in total

1.  [Is shorter really better? : Philosophy of short stem prosthesis designs].

Authors:  J Jerosch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: comparison between modular short-stem hip arthroplasty and conventional total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Florian Schmidutz; Marc Beirer; Patrick Weber; Farhad Mazoochian; Andreas Fottner; Volkmar Jansson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Differences between short stem prostheses].

Authors:  J Jerosch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Total hip arthroplasty instability in Italy.

Authors:  Francesco Falez; Matteo Papalia; Fabio Favetti; Gabriele Panegrossi; Filippo Casella; Gianluca Mazzotta
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  The Frank Stinchfield Award: the impact of socioeconomic factors on outcome after THA: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  R Allen Butler; Seth Rosenzweig; Leann Myers; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Does computer-assisted surgery benefit leg length restoration in total hip replacement? Navigation versus conventional freehand.

Authors:  Alfonso Manzotti; Pietro Cerveri; Elena De Momi; Chris Pullen; Norberto Confalonieri
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  A comparison of leg length and femoral offset discrepancies in hip resurfacing, large head metal-on- metal and conventional total hip replacement: a case series.

Authors:  Katie A Herman; Alan J Highcock; John D Moorehead; Simon J Scott
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Clinical efficacy of orthopilot navigation system versus conventional manual of total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianguo Jia; Qun Zhao; Pei Lu; Guiyong Fan; Hao Chen; Chaoqun Liu; Jinlian Liu; Sheng Chen; Zhengshuai Jin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  Revision rate after short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of 49 studies.

Authors:  Jakob van Oldenrijk; Jeroen Molleman; Michel Klaver; Rudolf W Poolman; Daniel Haverkamp
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Accuracy of image-free navigation in intraoperative leg length change from total hip arthroplasty using evaluations from 2D and 3D measurements.

Authors:  Shine Tone; Masahiro Hasegawa; Yohei Naito; Hiroki Wakabayashi; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.