Literature DB >> 24002964

How memory mechanisms are a key component in the guidance of our eye movements: evidence from the global effect.

J D Silvis1, S Van der Stigchel.   

Abstract

Investigating eye movements has been a promising approach to uncover the role of visual working memory in early attentional processes. Prior research has already demonstrated that eye movements in search tasks are more easily drawn toward stimuli that show similarities to working memory content, as compared with neutral stimuli. Previous saccade tasks, however, have always required a selection process, thereby automatically recruiting working memory. The present study was an attempt to confirm the role of working memory in oculomotor selection in an unbiased saccade task that rendered memory mechanisms irrelevant. Participants executed a saccade in a display with two elements, without any instruction to aim for one particular element. The results show that when two objects appear simultaneously, a working memory match attracts the first saccade more profoundly than do mismatch objects, an effect that was present throughout the saccade latency distribution. These findings demonstrate that memory plays a fundamental biasing role in the earliest competitive processes in the selection of visual objects, even when working memory is not recruited during selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24002964     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0498-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  34 in total

1.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  The neural basis of biased competition in human visual cortex.

Authors:  S Kastner; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Early oculomotor capture by new onsets driven by the contents of working memory.

Authors:  Sabira K Mannan; Christopher Kennard; Daniela Potter; Yi Pan; David Soto
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory.

Authors:  David Soto; Dietmar Heinke; Glyn W Humphreys; Manuel J Blanco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Relation between saccade trajectories and spatial distractor locations.

Authors:  Stefan Van der Stigchel; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-30

6.  The role of visual working memory (VWM) in the control of gaze during visual search.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  A parametric study of prefrontal cortex involvement in human working memory.

Authors:  T S Braver; J D Cohen; L E Nystrom; J Jonides; E E Smith; D C Noll
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism.

Authors:  H Deubel; W X Schneider
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Latency dependence of colour-based target vs nontarget discrimination by the saccadic system.

Authors:  F P Ottes; J A Van Gisbergen; J J Eggermont
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Saccade latency and warning signals: stimulus onset, offset, and change as warning events.

Authors:  L E Ross; S M Ross
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-03
View more
  8 in total

1.  Automatic and intentional influences on saccade landing.

Authors:  David Aagten-Murphy; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Visual working memory modulates within-object metrics of saccade landing position.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Visual Working Memory Enhances the Neural Response to Matching Visual Input.

Authors:  Surya Gayet; Matthias Guggenmos; Thomas B Christophel; John-Dylan Haynes; Chris L E Paffen; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Philipp Sterzer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Attentional Prioritization of Complex, Naturalistic Stimuli Maintained in Working-Memory-A Dot-Probe Event-Related Potentials Study.

Authors:  Natalia Rutkowska; Łucja Doradzińska; Michał Bola
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.473

5.  Visual working memory modulates low-level saccade target selection: evidence from rapidly generated saccades in the global effect paradigm.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Michi Matsukura; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Prospectively reinstated memory drives conscious access of matching visual input.

Authors:  Surya Gayet; Dirk van Moorselaar; Christian N L Olivers; Chris L E Paffen; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Negative versus positive priming: When are distractors inhibited?

Authors:  Stefan Van der Stigchel; Martijn Meeter
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 0.957

8.  The Effects of Feature-Based Priming and Visual Working Memory on Oculomotor Capture.

Authors:  Jeroen D Silvis; Artem V Belopolsky; Jozua W I Murris; Mieke Donk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.