Literature DB >> 24389997

Concurrent prediction of muscle and tibiofemoral contact forces during treadmill gait.

Trent M Guess, Antonis P Stylianou, Mohammad Kia.   

Abstract

Detailed knowledge of knee kinematics and dynamic loading is essential for improving the design and outcomes of surgical procedures, tissue engineering applications, prosthetics design, and rehabilitation. This study used publicly available data provided by the "Grand Challenge Competition to Predict in-vivo Knee Loads" for the 2013 American Society of Mechanical Engineers Summer Bioengineering Conference (Fregly et al., 2012, "Grand Challenge Competition to Predict in vivo Knee Loads," J. Orthop. Res., 30, pp. 503-513) to develop a full body, musculoskeletal model with subject specific right leg geometries that can concurrently predict muscle forces, ligament forces, and knee and ground contact forces. The model includes representation of foot/floor interactions and predicted tibiofemoral joint loads were compared to measured tibial loads for two different cycles of treadmill gait. The model used anthropometric data (height and weight) to scale the joint center locations and mass properties of a generic model and then used subject bone geometries to more accurately position the hip and ankle. The musculoskeletal model included 44 muscles on the right leg, and subject specific geometries were used to create a 12 degrees-of-freedom anatomical right knee that included both patellofemoral and tibiofemoral articulations. Tibiofemoral motion was constrained by deformable contacts defined between the tibial insert and femoral component geometries and by ligaments. Patellofemoral motion was constrained by contact between the patellar button and femoral component geometries and the patellar tendon. Shoe geometries were added to the feet, and shoe motion was constrained by contact between three shoe segments per foot and the treadmill surface. Six-axis springs constrained motion between the feet and shoe segments. Experimental motion capture data provided input to an inverse kinematics stage, and the final forward dynamics simulations tracked joint angle errors for the left leg and upper body and tracked muscle length errors for the right leg. The one cycle RMS errors between the predicted and measured tibia contact were 178 N and 168 N for the medial and lateral sides for the first gait cycle and 209 N and 228 N for the medial and lateral sides for the faster second gait cycle. One cycle RMS errors between predicted and measured ground reaction forces were 12 N, 13 N, and 65 N in the anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and vertical directions for the first gait cycle and 43 N, 15 N, and 96 N in the anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and vertical directions for the second gait cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24389997      PMCID: PMC4023658          DOI: 10.1115/1.4026359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  30 in total

1.  Recruitment of knee joint ligaments.

Authors:  L Blankevoort; R Huiskes; A de Lange
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Computational modelling of a total knee prosthetic loaded in a dynamic knee simulator.

Authors:  Trent M Guess; Lorin P Maletsky
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  ESB Clinical Biomechanics Award 2008: Complete data of total knee replacement loading for level walking and stair climbing measured in vivo with a follow-up of 6-10 months.

Authors:  Bernd Heinlein; Ines Kutzner; Friedmar Graichen; Alwina Bender; Antonius Rohlmann; Andreas M Halder; Alexander Beier; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  In vivo knee loading characteristics during activities of daily living as measured by an instrumented total knee replacement.

Authors:  Annegret Mündermann; Chris O Dyrby; Darryl D D'Lima; Clifford W Colwell; Thomas P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  A graphics-based software system to develop and analyze models of musculoskeletal structures.

Authors:  S L Delp; J P Loan
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.589

6.  A three-dimensional mathematical model of the knee-joint.

Authors:  J Wismans; F Veldpaus; J Janssen; A Huson; P Struben
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  A multibody knee model with discrete cartilage prediction of tibio-femoral contact mechanics.

Authors:  Trent M Guess; Hongzeng Liu; Sampath Bhashyam; Ganesh Thiagarajan
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 1.763

8.  Tibio-femoral loading during human gait and stair climbing.

Authors:  William R Taylor; Markus O Heller; Georg Bergmann; Georg N Duda
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Interaction between active and passive knee stabilizers during level walking.

Authors:  O D Schipplein; T P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Muscle-driven forward dynamic simulations for the study of normal and pathological gait.

Authors:  Stephen J Piazza
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  12 in total

1.  The Influence of Component Alignment and Ligament Properties on Tibiofemoral Contact Forces in Total Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Colin R Smith; Michael F Vignos; Rachel L Lenhart; Jarred Kaiser; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Automated muscle segmentation from CT images of the hip and thigh using a hierarchical multi-atlas method.

Authors:  Futoshi Yokota; Yoshito Otake; Masaki Takao; Takeshi Ogawa; Toshiyuki Okada; Nobuhiko Sugano; Yoshinobu Sato
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Efficient Computation of Cartilage Contact Pressures within Dynamic Simulations of Movement.

Authors:  Colin R Smith; Kwang Won Choi; Dan Negrut; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis       Date:  2016-05-13

4.  Predicted loading on the menisci during gait: The effect of horn laxity.

Authors:  Trent M Guess; Swithin Razu; Hamidreza Jahandar; Antonis Stylianou
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Development of a Subject-Specific Foot-Ground Contact Model for Walking.

Authors:  Jennifer N Jackson; Chris J Hass; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Electromyography-Driven Forward Dynamics Simulation to Estimate In Vivo Joint Contact Forces During Normal, Smooth, and Bouncy Gaits.

Authors:  Swithin S Razu; Trent M Guess
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  A computational framework for simultaneous estimation of muscle and joint contact forces and body motion using optimization and surrogate modeling.

Authors:  Ilan Eskinazi; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.242

8.  ReadySim: A computational framework for building explicit finite element musculoskeletal simulations directly from motion laboratory data.

Authors:  Donald R Hume; Paul J Rullkoetter; Kevin B Shelburne
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.747

9.  Effect of Constraint Loading on the Lower Limb Muscle Forces in Weightless Treadmill Exercise.

Authors:  Ning Guo; Xingyu Fan; Yuting Wu; Zhili Li; Shujuan Liu; Linjie Wang; Jie Yao; Yinghui Li
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.682

10.  Musculoskeletal Model Development of the Elbow Joint with an Experimental Evaluation.

Authors:  Munsur Rahman; Mohsen Sharifi Renani; Akin Cil; Antonis P Stylianou
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.