Literature DB >> 19285654

Objective vs subjective vault measurement after myopic implantable collamer lens implantation.

José F Alfonso1, Carlos Lisa, Ana Palacios, Paulo Fernandes, José M González-Méijome, Robert Montés-Micó.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between subjective measurements of vault and objective values measured with Visante optical coherence tomography (OCT) in eyes receiving an implantable contact lens (ICL) for myopia correction.
DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Fernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, Oviedo, Spain. PATIENTS: Four hundred and fifty-two eyes from 246 patients were elected to be implanted with a Visian ICL V4 (STAAR Surgical Inc, Monrovia, California, USA). OBSERVATION PROCEDURES: Subjective and objective measurements of vault after implantation of ICL. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjective vault classified in 5 levels assessed using an optical section during slit-lamp examination. Objective vault was measured with Visante OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, California, USA).
RESULTS: Average values of objective and subjective vault were 414 +/- 228 microm and 2.1 +/- 1.0, respectively and both parameters were highly correlated (r = 0.82; P < .001). Differences in average objective vault were statistically significant among the 5 groups of subjective vault (P < .001). Subjective vault 0 corresponded to a mean OCT value of 62 +/- 49 microm with 99% confidence interval (CI) [38; 86] microm; eyes with vault 1 to 203 +/- 93 microm with 99% CI [176; 230] microm; eyes with vault 2 to 402 +/- 131 microm with 99% CI [378; 425] microm; eyes with vault 3 to 594 +/- 146 microm, 99% CI [554; 633] microm; and vault 4 to 794 +/- 182 microm with 99% CI [713; 875] microm.
CONCLUSIONS: Subjective and objective values of vault are highly correlated. In 99% of cases within the CI, objective values for eyes subjectively classified within a certain level vary within a narrow interval (+/-25 to 80 microm) around the mean value, and this interval is characteristic of each subjective level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19285654     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  12 in total

1.  Long-term evaluation of the central vault after phakic Collamer® lens (ICL) implantation using OCT.

Authors:  Jose F Alfonso; L Fernández-Vega; C Lisa; P Fernandes; J González-Meijome; R Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Three-year follow-up of subjective vault following myopic implantable collamer lens implantation.

Authors:  José F Alfonso; Carlos Lisa; A Abdelhamid; Paulo Fernandes; Jorge Jorge; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Repeatability of ocular biometry with IOLMaster 700 in subjects with clear lens.

Authors:  Manuel Garza-Leon; Hugo A Fuentes-de la Fuente; Ana V García-Treviño
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Comparison of visual and refractive results of Toric Implantable Collamer Lens with bioptics for myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  J F Alfonso; C Lisa; L Fernández-Vega Cueto; P Fernandes; J M González-Méijome; R Montés Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Meta-analysis and review: effectiveness, safety, and central port design of the intraocular collamer lens.

Authors:  Mark Packer
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-09

6.  Comparison of early changes in and factors affecting vault following posterior chamber phakic Implantable Collamer Lens implantation without and with a central hole (ICL V4 and ICL V4c).

Authors:  Xun Chen; Huamao Miao; Rajeev Krishnan Naidu; Xiaoying Wang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens with a central hole for moderate-to-high myopia: First experience in China.

Authors:  Xinfang Cao; Weiliang Wu; Yang Wang; Chen Xie; Jianping Tong; Ye Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Anterior Chamber Angle Evaluation following Phakic Posterior Chamber Collamer Lens with CentraFLOW and Its Correlation with ICL Vault and Intraocular Pressure.

Authors:  Sherif A Eissa; Sherin H Sadek; Mohamed W A El-Deeb
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Buffering zone of implantable Collamer lens sizing in V4c.

Authors:  Seung Wan Nam; Dong Hui Lim; Joo Hyun; Eui-Sang Chung; Tae-Young Chung
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  Toric Implantable Collamer Lens for the Treatment of Myopic Astigmatism.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Nour Bundogji; Alyson N Tukan; James H Ellis; Shannon E McCabe; Ayesha Patil; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.