Literature DB >> 19285399

Reduced effectiveness of selection caused by a lack of recombination.

Andrea J Betancourt1, John J Welch, Brian Charlesworth.   

Abstract

Genetic recombination associated with sexual reproduction is expected to have important consequences for the effectiveness of natural selection. These effects may be evident within genomes, in the form of contrasting patterns of molecular variation and evolution in regions with different levels of recombination. Previous work reveals patterns that are consistent with a benefit of recombination for adaptation at the level of protein sequence: both positive selection for adaptive variants and purifying selection against deleterious ones appear to be compromised in regions of low recombination [1-11]. Here, we re-examine these patterns by using polymorphism and divergence data from the Drosophila dot chromosome, which has a long history of reduced recombination. To avoid confounding selection and demographic effects, we collected these data from a species with an apparently stable demographic history, Drosophila americana. We find that D. americana dot loci show several signatures of ineffective purifying and positive selection, including an increase in the rate of protein evolution, an increase in protein polymorphism, and a reduction in the proportion of amino acid substitutions attributable to positive selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19285399     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  61 in total

1.  Quantifying the variation in the effective population size within a genome.

Authors:  Toni I Gossmann; Megan Woolfit; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genomic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Charles H Langley; Kristian Stevens; Charis Cardeno; Yuh Chwen G Lee; Daniel R Schrider; John E Pool; Sasha A Langley; Charlyn Suarez; Russell B Corbett-Detig; Bryan Kolaczkowski; Shu Fang; Phillip M Nista; Alisha K Holloway; Andrew D Kern; Colin N Dewey; Yun S Song; Matthew W Hahn; David J Begun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Mutation and the evolution of recombination.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Evolution of a distinct genomic domain in Drosophila: comparative analysis of the dot chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis.

Authors:  Wilson Leung; Christopher D Shaffer; Taylor Cordonnier; Jeannette Wong; Michelle S Itano; Elizabeth E Slawson Tempel; Elmer Kellmann; David Michael Desruisseau; Carolyn Cain; Robert Carrasquillo; Tien M Chusak; Katazyna Falkowska; Kelli D Grim; Rui Guan; Jacquelyn Honeybourne; Sana Khan; Louis Lo; Rebecca McGaha; Jevon Plunkett; Justin M Richner; Ryan Richt; Leah Sabin; Anita Shah; Anushree Sharma; Sonal Singhal; Fine Song; Christopher Swope; Craig B Wilen; Jeremy Buhler; Elaine R Mardis; Sarah C R Elgin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The joint effects of background selection and genetic recombination on local gene genealogies.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The role of advantageous mutations in enhancing the evolution of a recombination modifier.

Authors:  Matthew Hartfield; Sarah P Otto; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Muller's ratchet and the degeneration of the Drosophila miranda neo-Y chromosome.

Authors:  Vera B Kaiser; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Selection on codon usage and base composition in Drosophila americana.

Authors:  Sophie Marion de Procé; Kai Zeng; Andrea J Betancourt; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 9.  How closely does genetic diversity in finite populations conform to predictions of neutral theory? Large deficits in regions of low recombination.

Authors:  R Frankham
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Recombination yet inefficient selection along the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup's fourth chromosome.

Authors:  J Roman Arguello; Yue Zhang; Tomoyuki Kado; Chuanzhu Fan; Ruoping Zhao; Hideki Innan; Wen Wang; Manyuan Long
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.