Literature DB >> 19283496

A plot of G + C content against sequence length of 640 bacterial chromosomes shows the points are widely scattered in the upper triangular area.

Feng-Biao Guo1, Hao Lin, Jian Huang.   

Abstract

In this work, we study the distribution of G + C content against chromosome size among 640 fully sequenced bacterial chromosomes. When %G + C is plotted versus increasing chromosome length, it is shown that the points denoting 640 bacterial chromosomes are widely scattered in the upper triangular area and the triangle is right-angled. The mean G + C content increases while the range or variance of G + C contents decreases with length. The net effect of these two trends is to exclude data from a triangular area that should represent long A + T-rich chromosomes. Thus, the shorter chromosomes have a wide, 20-70%, range of G + C contents while the longest chromosomes are severely restricted to a G + C content near 70%. To generate the distribution type of right-angled triangle, two conditions are requisite. Consequently, two possible related explanations are presented to interpret the relationship. One aims to give the reason why most large bacterial chromosomes have high G + C contents and the other tries to interpret why most A + T-rich bacterial chromosomes tend to be small in size. Both of the two interpretations are proposed from the selectionist viewpoint and the latter is an addition to the former one. According to the theories, the bacteria with large chromosomes and bacteria with A + T-rich chromosomes have different tactics to cope with ultraviolet radiation and other physical or chemical damage.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19283496     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-009-9024-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  19 in total

1.  Base composition bias might result from competition for metabolic resources.

Authors:  Eduardo P C Rocha; Antoine Danchin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 2.  Genome evolution in bacterial endosymbionts of insects.

Authors:  Jennifer J Wernegreen
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Wide intra-genomic G+C heterogeneity in human and chicken is mainly due to strand-symmetric directional mutation pressures: dGTP-oxidation and symmetric cytosine-deamination hypotheses.

Authors:  Noboru Sueoka
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2002-10-30       Impact factor: 3.688

4.  Aerobiosis increases the genomic guanine plus cytosine content (GC%) in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Hugo Naya; Héctor Romero; Alejandro Zavala; Beatriz Alvarez; Héctor Musto
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Larger genomes for molluskan land pioneers.

Authors:  A E Vinogradov
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.166

6.  GC content variability of eubacteria is governed by the pol III alpha subunit.

Authors:  Xiaoqian Zhao; Zhang Zhang; Jiangwei Yan; Jun Yu
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Macroecology: the division of food and space among species on continents.

Authors:  J H Brown; B A Maurer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-03-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Genome size and GC-percent in vertebrates as determined by flow cytometry: the triangular relationship.

Authors:  A E Vinogradov
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1998-02-01

9.  High guanine plus cytosine content in the third letter of codons of an extreme thermophile. DNA sequence of the isopropylmalate dehydrogenase of Thermus thermophilus.

Authors:  Y Kagawa; H Nojima; N Nukiwa; M Ishizuka; T Nakajima; T Yasuhara; T Tanaka; T Oshima
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1984-03-10       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Nitrogen-fixing aerobic bacteria have higher genomic GC content than non-fixing species within the same genus.

Authors:  C E McEwan; D Gatherer; N R McEwan
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.271

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evolution of genome base composition and genome size in bacteria.

Authors:  Hiromi Nishida
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Comparative analyses of base compositions, DNA sizes, and dinucleotide frequency profiles in archaeal and bacterial chromosomes and plasmids.

Authors:  Hiromi Nishida
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-03-26

3.  How do eubacterial organisms manage aggregation-prone proteome?

Authors:  Rishi Das Roy; Manju Bhardwaj; Vasudha Bhatnagar; Kausik Chakraborty; Debasis Dash
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-06-27

4.  Comprehensive analysis of DNA polymerase III α subunits and their homologs in bacterial genomes.

Authors:  Kestutis Timinskas; Monika Balvočiūtė; Albertas Timinskas; Česlovas Venclovas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Year-Long Metagenomic Study of River Microbiomes Across Land Use and Water Quality.

Authors:  Thea Van Rossum; Michael A Peabody; Miguel I Uyaguari-Diaz; Kirby I Cronin; Michael Chan; Jared R Slobodan; Matthew J Nesbitt; Curtis A Suttle; William W L Hsiao; Patrick K C Tang; Natalie A Prystajecky; Fiona S L Brinkman
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Correlation between bacterial G+C content, genome size and the G+C content of associated plasmids and bacteriophages.

Authors:  Apostolos Almpanis; Martin Swain; Derek Gatherer; Neil McEwan
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2018-04-10

Review 7.  Xenogeneic Silencing and Bacterial Genome Evolution: Mechanisms for DNA Recognition Imply Multifaceted Roles of Xenogeneic Silencers.

Authors:  Bo Duan; Pengfei Ding; William Wiley Navarre; Jun Liu; Bin Xia
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 16.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.