Literature DB >> 1928309

Cochlear implant histopathology.

F H Linthicum1, J Fayad, S R Otto, F R Galey, W F House.   

Abstract

Twenty-two temporal bones and one brain stem from 13 cochlear implant patients were examined histologically. Sixteen temporal bones had undergone one or more implant procedure. Results of analysis suggested that the ganglion cells were the responding elements to the implant and that useful auditory sensation could result from as few as 10 percent of the normal number of ganglion cells. All implanted bones exhibited varying amounts of fibrosis (some ossified) in the basal turn of the cochlea and beyond in some cases. Usually there was damage to the surviving elements of the organ of Corti and the dendrites throughout the extent of the electrode insertion. However, the ganglion cell population was not affected. Prolonged electrical stimulation (up to 14 years) did not affect ganglion cell survival in three cases, and had no effect on the cochlear nerves in two cases or on cochlear nuclei in one case.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1928309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otol        ISSN: 0192-9763


  30 in total

1.  The histopathology of revision cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Joonhan Lee; Donald K Eddington; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Modelling encapsulation tissue around cochlear implant electrodes.

Authors:  T Hanekom
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Combining cell-based therapies and neural prostheses to promote neural survival.

Authors:  Andrew K Wise; James B Fallon; Alison J Neil; Lisa N Pettingill; Marilyn S Geaney; Stephen J Skinner; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Surgical findings and auditory performance after cochlear implant revision surgery.

Authors:  R Manrique-Huarte; A Huarte; M J Manrique
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Psychophysical Tuning Curves as a Correlate of Electrode Position in Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-04

6.  Intracochlear inflammatory response to cochlear implant electrodes in humans.

Authors:  Mohammad Seyyedi; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Viral D Tejani; Julia K Omtvedt; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Jacob J Oleson; Marie V Ozanne
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Ganglion cell and 'dendrite' populations in electric acoustic stimulation ears.

Authors:  Helge Rask-Andersen; Wei Liu; Fred Linthicum
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

Review 10.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.