Literature DB >> 10854465

Risk perception and risk communication for cancer screening behaviors: a review.

S W Vernon1.   

Abstract

This review summarizes and synthesizes research findings on risk perception and risk communication related to cancer screening behaviors. The focus is on cancers for which there is evidence that screening reduces mortality, i.e., cervical, breast, and colorectal cancers. The following questions are addressed: 1) Is perceived risk associated with relevant cancer screening behaviors? 2) What factors are associated with perceived risk? 3) Is the relationship between perceived risk and cancer screening behaviors modified by other factors? 4) Have interventions to change perceived risk been effective in modifying risk perceptions? 5) Are these changes related to subsequent cancer screening behaviors? Methodologic issues are discussed, and future research needs are identified. There was consistent evidence that perceived risk was associated with mammography screening, but there were insufficient data on these associations for cervical or colorectal cancer screening behaviors. There was some evidence that perceived risk mediated the association between other variables and screening behaviors; however, because of the small number of studies, the findings are best viewed as hypothesis generating. Studies of interventions to modify risk perceptions provided some support for the view that they are modifiable, but there was conflicting evidence that these changes were related to subsequent cancer screening. Methodologic studies of how best to measure perceived risk are needed. Because most data on the correlates of perceived risk were cross-sectional, it is difficult to determine whether perceived risk is a cause or an effect in relation to cancer screening. Longitudinal studies that measure perceived risk in defined populations with different cancer screening histories and that include follow-up for screening and repeated measurements of risk perception are needed to clarify this relationship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10854465     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  75 in total

Review 1.  Research issues in genetic testing of adolescents for obesity.

Authors:  Mary E Segal; Pamela Sankar; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.110

2.  Media messages about cancer: what do people understand?

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Josephine Calvi; Rebecca Cowan; Mary E Costanza; Paul K J Han; Sarah M Greene; Laura Saccoccio; Erica Cove; Douglas Roblin; Andrew Williams
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2010

3.  The relationship of health numeracy to cancer screening.

Authors:  Marilyn M Schapira; Joan Neuner; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Mary Ann Gilligan; Elisabeth Hayes; Purushottam Laud
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Perceived risk for breast cancer and its relationship to mammography in Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites.

Authors:  Heather Orom; Marc T Kiviniemi; Vickie L Shavers; Levi Ross; Willie Underwood
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-07-08

5.  Correlates of perceived risk of developing cancer among African-Americans in South Los Angeles.

Authors:  Anna Lucas-Wright; Mohsen Bazargan; Loretta Jones; Jaydutt V Vadgama; Roberto Vargas; Marianna Sarkissyan; James Smith; Hamed Yazdanshenas; Annette E Maxwell
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2014-02

6.  Perception of Colorectal Cancer Risk does not Enhance Participation in Screening.

Authors:  Keith Dear; Leitha Scott; Sharon Chambers; Mike C Corbett; Doug Taupin
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.409

7.  The relation between projected breast cancer risk, perceived cancer risk, and mammography use. Results from the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  C P Gross; G Filardo; H S Singh; A N Freedman; M H Farrell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Breast cancer surveillance practices among women previously treated with chest radiation for a childhood cancer.

Authors:  Kevin C Oeffinger; Jennifer S Ford; Chaya S Moskowitz; Lisa R Diller; Melissa M Hudson; Joanne F Chou; Stephanie M Smith; Ann C Mertens; Tara O Henderson; Debra L Friedman; Wendy M Leisenring; Leslie L Robison
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Factors associated with a lack of pap smear utilization in women exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Camp; Angela W Prehn; Ji Shen; Arthur L Herbst; William C Strohsnitter; Christopher D Hobday; Stanley J Robboy; Ervin Adam
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Sun protection and skin self-examination in melanoma survivors.

Authors:  Urvi J Mujumdar; Jennifer L Hay; Yvette C Monroe-Hinds; Amanda J Hummer; Colin B Begg; Homer B Wilcox; Susan A Oliveria; Marianne Berwick
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.