Literature DB >> 23121110

Associations between risk perceptions and worry about common diseases: a between- and within-subjects examination.

Shoshana Shiloh1, Christopher H Wade, J Scott Roberts, Sharon Hensley Alford, Barbara B Biesecker.   

Abstract

The relationships between worry and perceptions of likelihood and severity were evaluated across eight common diseases. Individual and disease variability in worry and perceptions were examined. 294 participants were recruited through the Multiplex Initiative, in which a genetic susceptibility test for eight common diseases was offered to healthy adults. Participants completed a baseline telephone survey and web-based surveys without a commitment to be tested, and then made a choice on testing. Between- and within-subjects analyses yielded the following main findings: (1) worry is more closely related to likelihood perceptions than to severity perceptions; (2) severity perceptions add significantly to explained worry variances above and beyond likelihood perceptions; (3) risk perceptions and worries form two clusters: cancer diseases and cardiovascular-metabolic diseases; and (4) variance in risk perception and worry is explained by a combination of between- and within-subjects variances. Risk perception research should attend to severity perceptions, within-subjects variability and inter-disease differences, and to strategies for grouping conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23121110      PMCID: PMC3566271          DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2012.737464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Health        ISSN: 0887-0446


  36 in total

1.  Risk as feelings.

Authors:  G F Loewenstein; E U Weber; C K Hsee; N Welch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Participation in genetic testing research varies by social group.

Authors:  Sharon Hensley Alford; Colleen M McBride; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Worry and risk perception.

Authors:  L Sjöberg
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Judgment of riskiness: impact of personality, naive theories and heuristic thinking among female students.

Authors:  Kamel Gana; Marcel Lourel; Raphaël Trouillet; Isabelle Fort; Djamila Mezred; Christophe Blaison; Valerian Boudjemadi; Pascaline K'Delant; Julie Ledrich
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2010-02

5.  Prevalence and correlates of illness worry in the general population.

Authors:  Russell Noyes; Caroline P Carney; Stephen L Hillis; Laura E Jones; Douglas R Langbehn
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.386

Review 6.  The role of cancer worry in cancer screening: a theoretical and empirical review of the literature.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Tamara R Buckley; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Coping disposition, perceived risk, and psychological distress among women at increased risk for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M D Schwartz; C Lerman; S M Miller; M Daly; A Masny
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Perceived risk for gastric cancer among the general Korean population: a population-based survey.

Authors:  Min-Son Kwak; Kui Son Choi; Sohee Park; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Why would social networks be linked to affect and health practices?

Authors:  Sheldon Cohen; Edward P Lemay
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.267

10.  Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Sharon Hensley Alford; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  12 in total

1.  The interplay between feelings and beliefs about condoms as predictors of their use.

Authors:  Erin M Ellis; Rekha Rajagopal; Marc T Kiviniemi
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2017-04-27

2.  Factors affecting breast cancer patients' need for genetic risk information: From information insufficiency to information need.

Authors:  Soo Jung Hong; Barbara Biesecker; Jennifer Ivanovich; Melody Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Influence of individual differences in disease perception on consumer response to direct-to-consumer genomic testing.

Authors:  D L Boeldt; N J Schork; E J Topol; C S Bloss
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  Predictors of adverse psychological experiences surrounding genome-wide profiling for disease risk.

Authors:  K M Broady; K E Ormond; E J Topol; N J Schork; Cinnamon S Bloss
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-11-13

5.  Worry about skin cancer mediates the relation of perceived cancer risk and sunscreen use.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Erin M Ellis
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2013-09-27

6.  Psychosocial and Clinical Factors Associated with Family Communication of Cancer Genetic Test Results among Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer at a Young Age.

Authors:  Ashley Elrick; Sato Ashida; Jennifer Ivanovich; Sarah Lyons; Barbara B Biesecker; Melody S Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Stroke and TIA survivors' cognitive beliefs and affective responses regarding treatment and future stroke risk differentially predict medication adherence and categorised stroke risk.

Authors:  L Alison Phillips; Michael A Diefenbach; Jessica Abrams; Carol R Horowitz
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2014-10-01

8.  The Fear of Cancer from the Standpoint of Oneself, the Opposite Sex and the Fear of Side Effects of Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Keeho Park; Youngae Kim; Hyung Kook Yang; Hye Sook Min
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.679

9.  Cognitive and Affective Risk Beliefs and their Association with Protective Health Behavior in Response to the Novel Health Threat of COVID-19.

Authors:  Renee E Magnan; Laurel P Gibson; Angela D Bryan
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2021-01-30

10.  How does the COVID-19 pandemic impact on population mental health? A network analysis of COVID influences on depression, anxiety and traumatic stress in the UK population.

Authors:  Orestis Zavlis; Sarah Butter; Kate Bennett; Todd K Hartman; Philip Hyland; Liam Mason; Orla McBride; Jamie Murphy; Jilly Gibson-Miller; Liat Levita; Anton P Martinez; Mark Shevlin; Thomas V A Stocks; Frédérique Vallières; Richard P Bentall
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 7.723

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.