Literature DB >> 19276274

Effective incorporation of biomarkers into phase II trials.

Lisa M McShane1, Sally Hunsberger, Alex A Adjei.   

Abstract

The incorporation of biomarkers into the drug development process will improve understanding of how new therapeutics work and allow for more accurate identification of patients who will benefit from those therapies. Strategically planned biomarker evaluations in phase II studies may allow for the design of more efficient phase III trials and better screening of therapeutics for entry into phase III development, hopefully leading to increased chances of positive phase III trial results. Some examples of roles that a biomarker can play in a phase II trial include predictor of response or resistance to specific therapies, patient enrichment, correlative endpoint, or surrogate endpoint. Considerations for using biomarkers most effectively in these roles are discussed in the context of several examples. The substantial technical, logistic, and ethical challenges that can be faced when trying to incorporate biomarkers into phase II trials are also addressed. A rational and coordinated approach to the inclusion of biomarker studies throughout the drug development process will be the key to attaining the goal of personalized medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19276274      PMCID: PMC2874890          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  36 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Design issues of randomized phase II trials and a proposal for phase II screening trials.

Authors:  Lawrence V Rubinstein; Edward L Korn; Boris Freidlin; Sally Hunsberger; S Percy Ivy; Malcolm A Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  An adaptive Simon Two-Stage Design for Phase 2 studies of targeted therapies.

Authors:  Cheryl L Jones; Eric Holmgren
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 4.  Considerations for the use of imaging tools for phase II treatment trials in oncology.

Authors:  Lalitha K Shankar; Annick Van den Abbeele; Jeff Yap; Robert Benjamin; Scott Scheutze; T J Fitzgerald
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Recommendations for collection and handling of specimens from group breast cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Brian R Leyland-Jones; Christine B Ambrosone; John Bartlett; Matthew J C Ellis; Rebecca A Enos; Adekunle Raji; Michael R Pins; Jo Anne Zujewski; Stephen M Hewitt; John F Forbes; Mark Abramovitz; Sofia Braga; Fatima Cardoso; Nadia Harbeck; Carsten Denkert; Scott D Jewell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  HER2 status and benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab in breast cancer.

Authors:  Soonmyung Paik; Chungyeul Kim; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Comparison of standard and CA-125 response criteria in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated with platinum or paclitaxel.

Authors:  J A Bridgewater; A E Nelstrop; G J Rustin; M E Gore; W P McGuire; W J Hoskins
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Clinical utility of epidermal growth factor receptor expression for selecting patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer for treatment with erlotinib.

Authors:  Gary M Clark; Denni M Zborowski; Jennifer L Culbertson; Marlo Whitehead; Michelle Savoie; Lesley Seymour; Frances A Shepherd
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 9.  Surrogate biomarkers in evaluating response to anti-angiogenic agents: focus on sunitinib.

Authors:  S E DePrimo; C Bello
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  BAY 43-9006 exhibits broad spectrum oral antitumor activity and targets the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Scott M Wilhelm; Christopher Carter; Liya Tang; Dean Wilkie; Angela McNabola; Hong Rong; Charles Chen; Xiaomei Zhang; Patrick Vincent; Mark McHugh; Yichen Cao; Jaleel Shujath; Susan Gawlak; Deepa Eveleigh; Bruce Rowley; Li Liu; Lila Adnane; Mark Lynch; Daniel Auclair; Ian Taylor; Rich Gedrich; Andrei Voznesensky; Bernd Riedl; Leonard E Post; Gideon Bollag; Pamela A Trail
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 13.312

View more
  23 in total

1.  Circulating endothelial cells and their apoptotic fraction are mutually independent predictive biomarkers in Bevacizumab-based treatment for advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mariangela Manzoni; Sara Mariucci; Sara Delfanti; Bianca Rovati; Monica Ronzoni; Fotios Loupakis; Silvia Brugnatelli; Carmine Tinelli; Eugenio Villa; Alfredo Falcone; Marco Danova
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Discovery and validation of graft-versus-host disease biomarkers.

Authors:  Sophie Paczesny
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Comparison of error rates in single-arm versus randomized phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Hui Tang; Nathan R Foster; Axel Grothey; Stephen M Ansell; Richard M Goldberg; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The design of phase II clinical trials testing cancer therapeutics: consensus recommendations from the clinical trial design task force of the national cancer institute investigational drug steering committee.

Authors:  Lesley Seymour; S Percy Ivy; Daniel Sargent; David Spriggs; Laurence Baker; Larry Rubinstein; Mark J Ratain; Michael Le Blanc; David Stewart; John Crowley; Susan Groshen; Jeffrey S Humphrey; Pamela West; Donald Berry
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Goshi Shiota; Norimasa Miura
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-26

Review 6.  Radiogenomics and radiotherapy response modeling.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Sarah L Kerns; James Coates; Yi Luo; Corey Speers; Catharine M L West; Barry S Rosenstein; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  The Challenge for Development of Valuable Immuno-oncology Biomarkers.

Authors:  Janice M Mehnert; Arta M Monjazeb; Johanna M T Beerthuijzen; Deborah Collyar; Larry Rubinstein; Lyndsay N Harris
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Fit-for-purpose biomarker method validation for application in clinical trials of anticancer drugs.

Authors:  J Cummings; F Raynaud; L Jones; R Sugar; C Dive
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  Randomized phase II designs.

Authors:  Larry Rubinstein; John Crowley; Percy Ivy; Michael Leblanc; Dan Sargent
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  Molecular and clinical implementations of ovarian cancer mouse avatar models.

Authors:  Amira A Zayed; Sumithra J Mandrekar; Paul Haluska
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.