Literature DB >> 17412647

An adaptive Simon Two-Stage Design for Phase 2 studies of targeted therapies.

Cheryl L Jones1, Eric Holmgren.   

Abstract

The field of specialized medicine and clinical development programs for targeted cancer therapies are rapidly expanding. The proposed Phase 2 design allows for preliminary determination of efficacy that may be restricted to a particular sub-population defined by biomarker status (presence/absence). The design is an adaptation of the Simon Two-Stage Design. We provide examples where the adaptation can result in substantial savings in sample size and thus potentially lead to greater efficiency in decision making during the drug development process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17412647     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  12 in total

1.  An efficient basket trial design.

Authors:  Kristen M Cunanan; Alexia Iasonos; Ronglai Shen; Colin B Begg; Mithat Gönen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Biomarker enrichment strategies: matching trial design to biomarker credentials.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Edward L Korn
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Effective incorporation of biomarkers into phase II trials.

Authors:  Lisa M McShane; Sally Hunsberger; Alex A Adjei
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  A review of phase II trial designs for initial marker validation.

Authors:  Sumithra J Mandrekar; Ming-Wen An; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Spatial Two-stage Designs for Phase II Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Seongho Kim; Weng Kee Wong
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 1.681

6.  Minimizing the maximum expected sample size in two-stage Phase II clinical trials with continuous outcomes.

Authors:  James M S Wason; Adrian P Mander
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 7.  Biomarker-Guided Adaptive Trial Designs in Phase II and Phase III: A Methodological Review.

Authors:  Miranta Antoniou; Andrea L Jorgensen; Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-Dona
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  An adaptive design for updating the threshold value of a continuous biomarker.

Authors:  Amy V Spencer; Chris Harbron; Adrian Mander; James Wason; Ian Peers
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  A perspective on challenges and issues in biomarker development and drug and biomarker codevelopment.

Authors:  Sheila E Taube; Gary M Clark; Janet E Dancey; Lisa M McShane; Caroline C Sigman; Steven I Gutman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  An optimal stratified Simon two-stage design.

Authors:  Deepak Parashar; Jack Bowden; Colin Starr; Lorenz Wernisch; Adrian Mander
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 1.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.