Literature DB >> 19275283

Contribution of very low amplitude-modulation rates to intelligibility in a competing-speech task (L).

Christian Füllgrabe1, Michael A Stone, Brian C J Moore.   

Abstract

It is generally agreed that the slow fluctuations in the envelope of speech in different spectral channels carry critical information for intelligibility. Previous studies in which amplitude modulation (AM) was selectively removed from the speech signal showed that modulation rates between 4 and 16 Hz are most important, and that rates falling outside this range contribute little or not at all to speech intelligibility. The present study investigated the role of very low (<4 Hz) AM rates in the ability to identify sentences in an interfering background talker. The mixture was processed through a noise vocoder. The depth of AM with rates below 4, 1.3, or 0.4 Hz was reduced using a multi-channel envelope compressor with a high compression ratio. Data obtained using nine normal-hearing listeners demonstrate that low-rate AM, in the range 0.4-4 Hz, contributes to the intelligibility of relatively long speech utterances, at least for adverse listening conditions in which background noise is present and listeners are forced to rely on envelope cues in a few spectral channels.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19275283     DOI: 10.1121/1.3075591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Coding of amplitude modulation in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Pingbo Yin; Jeffrey S Johnson; Kevin N O'Connor; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jiaqian Xu; Bobby E Gibbs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Processing Complex Sounds Passing through the Rostral Brainstem: The New Early Filter Model.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Tom A Campbell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Adaptive temporal encoding leads to a background-insensitive cortical representation of speech.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The effect of automatic gain control structure and release time on cochlear implant speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Phyu P Khing; Brett A Swanson; Eliathamby Ambikairajah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 5.750

7.  Does training with amplitude modulated tones affect tone-vocoded speech perception?

Authors:  Aina Casaponsa; Ediz Sohoglu; David R Moore; Christian Füllgrabe; Katharine Molloy; Sygal Amitay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Left Superior Temporal Gyrus Is Coupled to Attended Speech in a Cocktail-Party Auditory Scene.

Authors:  Marc Vander Ghinst; Mathieu Bourguignon; Marc Op de Beeck; Vincent Wens; Brice Marty; Sergio Hassid; Georges Choufani; Veikko Jousmäki; Riitta Hari; Patrick Van Bogaert; Serge Goldman; Xavier De Tiège
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech: Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners.

Authors:  Pranesh Bhargava; Etienne Gaudrain; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-18

10.  Binaural Pitch Fusion: Effects of Amplitude Modulation.

Authors:  Yonghee Oh; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.