INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is recommended for average-risk adults age 50 and older, yet half of eligible US adults are not current. This case study of highest performing practices within the Colorectal Screening in Primary Care study (C-TRIP) explains practice strategies used and provides a model for improving CRC screening in primary care. METHODS: A case study design was used to analyze practice performance data and qualitative data obtained from site visits, network meetings, and correspondence. The Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet) Translating Research into Practice (TRIP) Quality Improvement (QI) model provided an analytic framework to evaluate the 5 highest-performing practices in the C-TRIP intervention. Practice strategies were grouped within the concepts: prioritize performance (PP), redesign delivery system (RDS), electronic medical record tools (EMR), and activate the patient (AP). RESULTS: Thirteen specific practice strategies were exemplified within these four concepts (PP, RDS, EMR, AP). Most or all of these strategies were used by practices that achieved the highest proportion (up to 78%) of adults screened for CRC. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care practices achieving a high proportion of CRC screening use systematic processes in the organization of their care. This case study provides a framework to organize systems that increase early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer.
INTRODUCTION:Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is recommended for average-risk adults age 50 and older, yet half of eligible US adults are not current. This case study of highest performing practices within the Colorectal Screening in Primary Care study (C-TRIP) explains practice strategies used and provides a model for improving CRC screening in primary care. METHODS: A case study design was used to analyze practice performance data and qualitative data obtained from site visits, network meetings, and correspondence. The Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet) Translating Research into Practice (TRIP) Quality Improvement (QI) model provided an analytic framework to evaluate the 5 highest-performing practices in the C-TRIP intervention. Practice strategies were grouped within the concepts: prioritize performance (PP), redesign delivery system (RDS), electronic medical record tools (EMR), and activate the patient (AP). RESULTS: Thirteen specific practice strategies were exemplified within these four concepts (PP, RDS, EMR, AP). Most or all of these strategies were used by practices that achieved the highest proportion (up to 78%) of adults screened for CRC. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care practices achieving a high proportion of CRC screening use systematic processes in the organization of their care. This case study provides a framework to organize systems that increase early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer.
Authors: Steven Ornstein; Paul J Nietert; Ruth G Jenkins; Andrea M Wessell; Lynne S Nemeth; Chris Feifer; Sarah T Corley Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: Chris Feifer; Lynne Nemeth; Paul J Nietert; Andrea M Wessell; Ruth G Jenkins; Loraine Roylance; Steven M Ornstein Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2007 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Lynne S Nemeth; Andrea M Wessell; Ruth G Jenkins; Paul J Nietert; Heather A Liszka; Steven M Ornstein Journal: J Nurs Care Qual Date: 2007 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 1.597
Authors: Carrie N Klabunde; David Lanier; Erica S Breslau; Jane G Zapka; Robert H Fletcher; David F Ransohoff; Sidney J Winawer Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-05-30 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: K Robin Yabroff; Jane Zapka; Carrie N Klabunde; Gigi Yuan; Dennis W Buckman; David Haggstrom; Steven B Clauser; Jacqueline Miller; Stephen H Taplin Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Douglas H Fernald; Rebecca Mullen; Tristen Hall; Andrew Bienstock; Stephanie Kirchner; Kyle Knierim; Dionisia de la Cerda; Danelle Callan; Robert L Rhyne; L Miriam Dickinson; W Perry Dickinson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Cara B Litvin; Paul J Nietert; Ruth G Jenkins; Andrea M Wessell; Lynne S Nemeth; Steven M Ornstein Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-12-10 Impact factor: 5.128