Literature DB >> 19264937

High performance in screening for colorectal cancer: a Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet) case study.

Lynne S Nemeth1, Paul J Nietert, Steven M Ornstein.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is recommended for average-risk adults age 50 and older, yet half of eligible US adults are not current. This case study of highest performing practices within the Colorectal Screening in Primary Care study (C-TRIP) explains practice strategies used and provides a model for improving CRC screening in primary care.
METHODS: A case study design was used to analyze practice performance data and qualitative data obtained from site visits, network meetings, and correspondence. The Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet) Translating Research into Practice (TRIP) Quality Improvement (QI) model provided an analytic framework to evaluate the 5 highest-performing practices in the C-TRIP intervention. Practice strategies were grouped within the concepts: prioritize performance (PP), redesign delivery system (RDS), electronic medical record tools (EMR), and activate the patient (AP).
RESULTS: Thirteen specific practice strategies were exemplified within these four concepts (PP, RDS, EMR, AP). Most or all of these strategies were used by practices that achieved the highest proportion (up to 78%) of adults screened for CRC.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary care practices achieving a high proportion of CRC screening use systematic processes in the organization of their care. This case study provides a framework to organize systems that increase early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19264937      PMCID: PMC2696281          DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.02.080108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  12 in total

1.  Improving diabetes care through a multicomponent quality improvement model in a practice-based research network.

Authors:  Steven Ornstein; Paul J Nietert; Ruth G Jenkins; Andrea M Wessell; Lynne S Nemeth; Chris Feifer; Sarah T Corley
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  Comparing colorectal cancer screening and immunization status in older americans.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Helen I Meissner; Karen G Wooten; Nancy Breen; James A Singleton
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Different paths to high-quality care: three archetypes of top-performing practice sites.

Authors:  Chris Feifer; Lynne Nemeth; Paul J Nietert; Andrea M Wessell; Ruth G Jenkins; Loraine Roylance; Steven M Ornstein
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Strategies to accelerate translation of research into primary care within practices using electronic medical records.

Authors:  Lynne S Nemeth; Andrea M Wessell; Ruth G Jenkins; Paul J Nietert; Heather A Liszka; Steven M Ornstein
Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.597

5.  Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2006.

Authors:  Esther S Hing; Catharine W Burt; David A Woodwell
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  2007-10-26

6.  Effect of physician recommendation and patient adherence on rates of colorectal cancer testing.

Authors:  P Brawarsky; D R Brooks; L A Mucci; P A Wood
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2004

7.  Strategies for increasing adherence to clinical guidelines and improving patient outcomes in small primary care practices.

Authors:  Chris Feifer; Steven M Ornstein
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Saf       Date:  2004-08

Review 8.  Improving colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice: innovative strategies and future directions.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; David Lanier; Erica S Breslau; Jane G Zapka; Robert H Fletcher; David F Ransohoff; Sidney J Winawer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Increased use of colorectal cancer tests--United States, 2002 and 2004.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 17.586

10.  Recognizing and overcoming barriers to colorectal screening in primary care.

Authors:  Walter Leventhal; Rhoda Ascanio
Journal:  J S C Med Assoc       Date:  2008-02
View more
  5 in total

1.  Systems strategies to support cancer screening in U.S. primary care practice.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Jane Zapka; Carrie N Klabunde; Gigi Yuan; Dennis W Buckman; David Haggstrom; Steven B Clauser; Jacqueline Miller; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Colorectal cancer screening in primary care: translating research into practice.

Authors:  Steven Ornstein; Lynne S Nemeth; Ruth G Jenkins; Paul J Nietert
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Colorectal cancer screening in primary care: theoretical model to improve prevalence in the practice partner research network.

Authors:  Lynne S Nemeth; Ruth G Jenkins; Paul J Nietert; Steven M Ornstein
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2009-03-18

4.  Exemplary Practices in Cardiovascular Care: Results on Clinical Quality Measures from the EvidenceNOW Southwest Cooperative.

Authors:  Douglas H Fernald; Rebecca Mullen; Tristen Hall; Andrew Bienstock; Stephanie Kirchner; Kyle Knierim; Dionisia de la Cerda; Danelle Callan; Robert L Rhyne; L Miriam Dickinson; W Perry Dickinson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Translating CKD Research into Primary Care Practice: a Group-Randomized Study.

Authors:  Cara B Litvin; Paul J Nietert; Ruth G Jenkins; Andrea M Wessell; Lynne S Nemeth; Steven M Ornstein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 5.128

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.