Literature DB >> 21976292

Systems strategies to support cancer screening in U.S. primary care practice.

K Robin Yabroff1, Jane Zapka, Carrie N Klabunde, Gigi Yuan, Dennis W Buckman, David Haggstrom, Steven B Clauser, Jacqueline Miller, Stephen H Taplin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although systems strategies are effective in improving health care delivery, little is known about their use for cancer screening in U.S. primary care practice.
METHODS: We assessed primary care physicians' (N = 2,475) use of systems strategies for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in a national survey conducted in 2007. Systems strategies included patient and physician screening reminders, performance reports of screening rates, electronic medical records, implementation of in-practice guidelines, and use of nurse practitioners/physician assistants. We evaluated use of both patient and physician screening reminders with other strategies in separate models by screening type, adjusted for the effects of physician and practice characteristics with multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: Fewer than 10% of physicians used a comprehensive set of systems strategies to support cancer screening; use was greater for mammography and Pap testing than for CRC screening. In adjusted analyses, performance reports of cancer screening rates, medical record type, and in-practice guidelines were associated with use of both patient and physician screening reminders for mammography, Pap testing, and CRC screening (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Despite evidence supporting use of systems strategies in primary care, few physicians report using a comprehensive set of strategies to support cancer screening. IMPACT: Current health policy initiatives underscore the importance of increased implementation of systems strategies in primary care to improve the use and quality of cancer screening in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21976292      PMCID: PMC3237756          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  49 in total

1.  Screening for cervical cancer: recommendations and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.220

2.  Analysis & commentary. Unleashing nurse practitioners' potential to deliver primary care and lead teams.

Authors:  Joanne M Pohl; Charlene Hanson; Jamesetta A Newland; Linda Cronenwett
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Imagining an electronic medical record for turning cancer screening knowledge into practice.

Authors:  Stephen H Taplin; David Rollason; Anne Camp; Kristen diDonato; Elizabeth Maggenheimer
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits.

Authors:  Sowmya R Rao; Catherine M Desroches; Karen Donelan; Eric G Campbell; Paola D Miralles; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Patient experience should be part of meaningful-use criteria.

Authors:  James D Ralston; Katie Coleman; Robert J Reid; Matthew R Handley; Eric B Larson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Erin G Stone; Sally C Morton; Marlies E Hulscher; Margaret A Maglione; Elizabeth A Roth; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Brian S Mittman; Lisa V Rubenstein; Laurence Z Rubenstein; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 7.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Durado Brooks; Debbie Saslow; Otis W Brawley
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist; Alan M Zaslavsky; Richard Marshall; Robert H Fletcher; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-23

9.  Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Helfand; Benjamin K S Chan; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Melissa Rich; Steven M Teutsch; Alfred O Berg; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  36 in total

1.  Cervical cytology screening among low-income, minority adolescents in New York City following the 2009 ACOG guidelines.

Authors:  Jennifer Tsui; Annika M Hofstetter; Karen Soren
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Variation in Screening Abnormality Rates and Follow-Up of Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening within the PROSPR Consortium.

Authors:  Anna N A Tosteson; Elisabeth F Beaber; Jasmin Tiro; Jane Kim; Anne Marie McCarthy; Virginia P Quinn; V Paul Doria-Rose; Cosette M Wheeler; William E Barlow; Mackenzie Bronson; Michael Garcia; Douglas A Corley; Jennifer S Haas; Ethan A Halm; Aruna Kamineni; Carolyn M Rutter; Tor D Tosteson; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Donald L Weaver
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Formative Evaluation to Assess Communication Technology Access and Health Communication Preferences of Alaska Native People.

Authors:  Renee F Robinson; Denise A Dillard; Vanessa Y Hiratsuka; Julia J Smith; Steve Tierney; Jaedon P Avey; Dedra S Buchwald
Journal:  Int J Indig Health       Date:  2015

4.  Impact of GP reminders on follow-up of abnormal cervical cytology: a before-after study in Danish general practice.

Authors:  Bettina Kjær Kristiansen; Berit Andersen; Flemming Bro; Hans Svanholm; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  Individualizing cancer screening in older adults: a narrative review and framework for future research.

Authors:  Elizabeth Eckstrom; David H Feeny; Louise C Walter; Leslie A Perdue; Evelyn P Whitlock
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Colorectal cancer screening in the United States: Trends from 2008 to 2015 and variation by health insurance coverage.

Authors:  Janet S de Moor; Robin A Cohen; Jean A Shapiro; Marion R Nadel; Susan A Sabatino; K Robin Yabroff; Stacey Fedewa; Richard Lee; V Paul Doria-Rose; Cheryl Altice; Carrie N Klabunde
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Multi-level Influences on Breast Cancer Screening in Primary Care.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Tor D Tosteson; Julie Weiss; Jennifer S Haas; Martha Goodrich; Roberta DiFlorio; Charles Brackett; Cheryl Clark; Kimberly Harris; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  A Qualitative Study of Spanish-Speakers' Experience with Dense Breast Notifications in a Massachusetts Safety-Net Hospital.

Authors:  Christine M Gunn; Amy Fitzpatrick; Sarah Waugh; Michelle Carrera; Nancy R Kressin; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Tracy A Battaglia
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program in the era of health reform: a vision forward.

Authors:  Marcus Plescia; Faye Wong; Jennifer Pieters; Djenaba Joseph
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Influence of Age and Comorbidity on Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Elderly.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Yingye Zheng; Virginia P Quinn; Elisabeth F Beaber; Carolyn M Rutter; Ethan A Halm; Jessica Chubak; Chyke A Doubeni; Jennifer S Haas; Aruna Kamineni; Marilyn M Schapira; Pamela M Vacek; Michael P Garcia; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.