Cara B Litvin1, Paul J Nietert2, Ruth G Jenkins3, Andrea M Wessell3, Lynne S Nemeth4, Steven M Ornstein3. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. litvincb@musc.edu. 2. Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. 3. Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. 4. College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common in the primary care setting. Early interventions may prevent progression of renal disease and reduce risk for cardiovascular complications, yet quality gaps have been documented. Successful approaches to improve identification and management of CKD in primary care are needed. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether implementation of a primary care improvement model results in improved identification and management of CKD DESIGN: 18-month group-randomized study PARTICIPANTS: 21 primary care practices in 13 US states caring for 107,094 patients INTERVENTIONS:To promote implementation of CKD improvement strategies, intervention practices received clinical quality measure (CQM) reports at least quarterly, hosted an on-site visit and 2 webinars, and sent clinician/staff representatives to a "best practice" meeting. Control practices received CQM reports at least quarterly. MAIN MEASURES: Changes in practice adherence to a set of 11 CKD CQMs KEY RESULTS: We observed significantly greater improvements among intervention practices for annual screening for albuminuria in patients with diabetes or hypertension (absolute change 22% in the intervention group vs. - 2.6% in the control group, p < 0.0001) and annual monitoring for albuminuria in patients with CKD (absolute change 21% in the intervention group vs. - 2.0% in the control group, p < 0.0001). Avoidance of NSAIDs in patients with CKD declined in both intervention and control groups, with a significantly greater decline in the control practices (absolute change - 5.0% in the intervention group vs. - 10% in the control group, p < 0.0001). There were no other significant changes found for the other CQMs. Variable implementation of CKD improvement strategies was noted across the intervention practices. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a primary care improvement model designed to improve CKD identification and management resulted in significantly improved care on 3 out of 11 CQMs. Incomplete adoption of improvement strategies may have limited further improvement. Improving CKD identification and management likely requires a longer and more intensive intervention.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common in the primary care setting. Early interventions may prevent progression of renal disease and reduce risk for cardiovascular complications, yet quality gaps have been documented. Successful approaches to improve identification and management of CKD in primary care are needed. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether implementation of a primary care improvement model results in improved identification and management of CKD DESIGN: 18-month group-randomized study PARTICIPANTS: 21 primary care practices in 13 US states caring for 107,094 patients INTERVENTIONS: To promote implementation of CKD improvement strategies, intervention practices received clinical quality measure (CQM) reports at least quarterly, hosted an on-site visit and 2 webinars, and sent clinician/staff representatives to a "best practice" meeting. Control practices received CQM reports at least quarterly. MAIN MEASURES: Changes in practice adherence to a set of 11 CKD CQMs KEY RESULTS: We observed significantly greater improvements among intervention practices for annual screening for albuminuria in patients with diabetes or hypertension (absolute change 22% in the intervention group vs. - 2.6% in the control group, p < 0.0001) and annual monitoring for albuminuria in patients with CKD (absolute change 21% in the intervention group vs. - 2.0% in the control group, p < 0.0001). Avoidance of NSAIDs in patients with CKD declined in both intervention and control groups, with a significantly greater decline in the control practices (absolute change - 5.0% in the intervention group vs. - 10% in the control group, p < 0.0001). There were no other significant changes found for the other CQMs. Variable implementation of CKD improvement strategies was noted across the intervention practices. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a primary care improvement model designed to improve CKD identification and management resulted in significantly improved care on 3 out of 11 CQMs. Incomplete adoption of improvement strategies may have limited further improvement. Improving CKD identification and management likely requires a longer and more intensive intervention.
Authors: Thomas J Hoerger; John S Wittenborn; Joel E Segel; Nilka R Burrows; Kumiko Imai; Paul Eggers; Meda E Pavkov; Regina Jordan; Susan M Hailpern; Anton C Schoolwerth; Desmond E Williams Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2010-02-08 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Cara B Litvin; Paul J Nietert; Andrea M Wessell; Ruth G Jenkins; Steven M Ornstein Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2011-01-22 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Meredith C Foster; Andreea M Rawlings; Elizabeth Marrett; David Neff; Kerry Willis; Lesley A Inker; Josef Coresh; Elizabeth Selvin Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Suetonia C Palmer; Sankar D Navaneethan; Jonathan C Craig; David W Johnson; Vlado Perkovic; Jorgen Hegbrant; Giovanni F M Strippoli Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2014-05-31
Authors: T Ninomiya; V Perkovic; F Turnbull; B Neal; F Barzi; A Cass; C Baigent; J Chalmers; N Li; M Woodward; S MacMahon Journal: BMJ Date: 2013-10-03
Authors: Jennifer K Carroll; Gerald Pulver; L Miriam Dickinson; Wilson D Pace; Joseph A Vassalotti; Kim S Kimminau; Brian K Manning; Elizabeth W Staton; Chester H Fox Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2018-10-05