Literature DB >> 19263152

Using a dynamic training environment to acquire laparoscopic surgery skill.

A K Bell1, M Zhou, S D Schwaitzberg, C G L Cao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current physical laparoscopic surgical simulators provide training only for static tasks, which do not develop the more advanced hand-eye coordination skills needed to navigate the dynamic surgical environment. A novel dynamic minimally invasive training environment (DynaMITE) was developed to address this need. This study aimed to evaluate further the utility of the system as a training and skill assessment tool. Two studies were performed with a second-generation design. The authors hypothesized that the dynamic task environment would be challenging to novices and would differentiate experienced surgeons from the inexperienced by emphasising the dynamic skills gained through surgical experience.
METHODS: The participants in the first study were 42 novice and experienced surgeons attending the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) 2007 Learning Center, whereas the second controlled laboratory study had 16 participants (5 novices and 11 experienced surgeons). The participants performed two tasks: an aiming task and an object manipulation task. Both tasks were positioned on a dynamic platform that moved in five different trajectories.
RESULTS: The subjective feedback from the surgeons at the SAGES Learning Center was positive. The results from the controlled study showed significant performance deterioration in the fast diagonal task compared with the task of aiming and manipulating in the static environment for both experience groups but no performance differences between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic tasks are challenging, and surgeons need to be trained specifically for these tasks. The DynaMITE system can provide training benefits for dynamic skill development, even for expert surgeons who may have had no opportunity to gain these skills through their surgical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19263152     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0346-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  E C Hamilton; D J Scott; J B Fleming; R V Rege; R Laycock; P C Bergen; S T Tesfay; D B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Training the novice in laparoscopy. More challenge is better.

Authors:  M R Ali; Y Mowery; B Kaplan; E J DeMaria
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Transfer effects on a rotary pursuit task as a function of first-task difficulty.

Authors:  D S LORDAHL; E J ARCHER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1958-11

4.  What can the operator actually feel when performing a laparoscopy?

Authors:  G Picod; A C Jambon; D Vinatier; P Dubois
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic skills are improved with LapMentor training: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Pamela B Andreatta; Derek T Woodrum; John D Birkmeyer; Rajani K Yellamanchilli; Gerard M Doherty; Paul G Gauger; Rebecca M Minter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Invisible shadow for navigation and planning in minimal invasive surgery.

Authors:  Marios Nicolaou; Adam James; Benny P L Lo; Ara Darzi; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2005

7.  Innovative dynamic minimally invasive training environment (DynaMITE).

Authors:  Audrey K Bell; Matthew B Saide; Jacqueline T Johanas; Gary G Leisk; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Caroline G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.058

8.  Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome.

Authors:  V Mais; S Ajossa; S Guerriero; M Mascia; E Solla; G B Melis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 9.  Laparoscopic general surgery.

Authors:  N J Soper; L M Brunt; K Kerbl
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-02-10       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  How, when, and why bile duct injury occurs. A comparison between open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E M Targarona; C Marco; C Balagué; J Rodriguez; E Cugat; C Hoyuela; E Veloso; M Trias
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  5 in total

1.  Procedural surgical skill assessment in laparoscopic training environments.

Authors:  Munenori Uemura; Pierre Jannin; Makoto Yamashita; Morimasa Tomikawa; Tomohiko Akahoshi; Satoshi Obata; Ryota Souzaki; Satoshi Ieiri; Makoto Hashizume
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  The effect of defined auditory conditions versus mental loading on the laparoscopic motor skill performance of experts.

Authors:  Claudius Conrad; Yusuf Konuk; Paul Werner; Caroline G Cao; Andrew Warshaw; David Rattner; Daniel B Jones; Denise Gee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Objective assessment of the suture ligature method for the laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis model using a new computerized system.

Authors:  Munenori Uemura; Makoto Yamashita; Morimasa Tomikawa; Satoshi Obata; Ryota Souzaki; Satoshi Ieiri; Kenoki Ohuchida; Noriyuki Matsuoka; Tamotsu Katayama; Makoto Hashizume
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Resident performance in simulation module is associated with operating room performance for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yohei Kojima; Harry J Wong; Kristine Kuchta; Woody Denham; Stephen Haggerty; John Linn; Michael Ujiki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Subjective vs. objective assessment of simulation performance on laparoscopic cholecystectomy: are we evaluating the right things?

Authors:  Yohei Kojima; Harry J Wong; Kristine Kuchta; John G Linn; Stephen P Haggerty; Woody Denham; Michael B Ujiki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.453

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.