Literature DB >> 19263131

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: safe implementation of successful strategies to reduce conversion rates.

Shiong-Wen Low1, Shridhar Ganpathi Iyer, Stephen K-Y Chang, Kenneth S W Mak, Victor Tswen Wen Lee, Krishnakumar Madhavan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A higher rate of conversion to open surgery is a well-known problem in patients with acute cholecystitis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim of this study is to analyze factors which may impact on conversion rates, and to analyze our outcomes following implementation of a departmental strategy in reducing conversion rates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 122 patients with acute cholecystitis were considered for laparoscopic cholecystectomy from July 2003 to July 2007. An audit of the results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was done in July 2005 and a departmental strategy aimed at reducing the conversion rates was introduced. The strategies included early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (within 72 hours of admission), performed or supervised by specialist hepatobiliary surgeons, and modifications of operative techniques. This study compares the conversion rates before and after that audit. Forty-eight patients (group A) were from the preaudit period and the remaining 74 (group B) were from the postaudit period. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for conversion to open surgery and whether the strategies implemented resulted in decrease in conversion rates.
RESULTS: In the group A patients, there was a conversion rate of 29.2%. Gallbladder wall thickness of greater than 5 mm was found to be a statistically significant (p = 0.028) risk factor for conversion to open surgery. In group B patients, the conversion rates were significantly lower at 6.75% (p = 0.001). Analyzing both groups of patients, using multivariate analysis, gallbladder wall thickness, increasing age, and preaudit operative period were found to be independently associated with conversion to open surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that, with specific strategies to decrease conversion and with technical improvements, the conversion rates can be decreased with no demonstrable difference in postoperative complications. Gallbladder wall thickness and increasing age are risk factors for conversion to open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19263131     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0374-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  K Prakash; G Jacob; V Lekha; A Venugopal; B Venugopal; H Ramesh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Prospective evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  C F Chandler; J S Lane; P Ferguson; J E Thompson; S W Ashley
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Seigo Kitano; Toshifumi Matsumoto; Masaori Aramaki; Katsunori Kawano
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2002

4.  Timing of urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not influence conversion rate.

Authors:  J S Knight; S J Mercer; S S Somers; A M Walters; S A Sadek; S K C Toh
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  S B Kolla; S Aggarwal; A Kumar; R Kumar; S Chumber; R Parshad; V Seenu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Delay from symptom onset increases the conversion rate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Sirwan M Hadad; Jayant S Vaidya; Lee Baker; Hoey C Koh; Timothy P Heron; Kashif Hussain; Alastair M Thompson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  How early is early laparoscopic treatment of acute cholecystitis?

Authors:  Atul K Madan; Shaghayegh Aliabadi-Wahle; Donna Tesi; Lewis M Flint; Steven M Steinberg
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Risk factors influencing conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Theodoros E Pavlidis; Georgios N Marakis; Konstantinos Ballas; Nikolaos Symeonidis; Kyriakos Psarras; Savvas Rafailidis; Dimitrios Karvounaris; Athanasios K Sakantamis
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.878

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the various types of gallbladder inflammation: a prospective trial.

Authors:  S Eldar; E Sabo; E Nash; J Abrahamson; I Matter
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1998-06

10.  Effect of timing of surgery, type of inflammation, and sex on outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Kamal I A Gharaibeh; Gazi R Qasaimeh; Hussein Al-Heiss; Fouad Ammari; Kamal Bani-Hani; Tareq M Al-Jaberi; Said Al-Natour
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.878

View more
  9 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after a quarter century: why do we still convert?

Authors:  Balazs I Lengyel; Dan Azagury; Oliver Varban; Maria T Panizales; Jill Steinberg; David C Brooks; Stanley W Ashley; Ali Tavakkolizadeh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion: is the surgeon's selection needed?

Authors:  Sandra C Donkervoort; Lea M Dijksman; Lincey C F de Nes; Pieter G Versluis; Joris Derksen; Michael F Gerhards
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The degree of gallbladder wall thickness and its impact on outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Shankar R Raman; Dovid Moradi; Bassem M Samaan; Umar S Chaudhry; Kamal Nagpal; John Morgan Cosgrove; Daniel T Farkas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  [The intensive care gallbladder as shock organ: symptoms and therapy].

Authors:  C Rimkus; J C Kalff
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis within and beyond 72 h of symptom onset during emergency admissions.

Authors:  Bin Zhu; Zhanzhi Zhang; Yan Wang; Ke Gong; Yiping Lu; Nengwei Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: What is the price of conversion?

Authors:  Balazs I Lengyel; Maria T Panizales; Jill Steinberg; Stanley W Ashley; Ali Tavakkoli
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Cholecystectomy prevalence and treatment cost: an 8-year study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chiu-E Hsu; King-Teh Lee; Chao-Sung Chang; Herng-Chia Chiu; Fang-Tse Chao; Hon-Yi Shi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Liver Trauma: Until When We Have to Delay Surgery? A Review.

Authors:  Inés Cañas García; Julio Santoyo Villalba; Domenico Iovino; Caterina Franchi; Valentina Iori; Giuseppe Pettinato; Davide Inversini; Francesco Amico; Giuseppe Ietto
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-06

9.  Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Trainees: Predictors and Results in an Academic Teaching Hospital.

Authors:  Hussein M Atta; Ashraf A Mohamed; Alaa M Sewefy; Abdel-Fatah S Abdel-Fatah; Mohammed M Mohammed; Ahmed M Atiya
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 2.260

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.