Literature DB >> 19263126

Outpatient percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in selected head and neck cancer patients.

Gustavo Francisco de Souza e Mello1, Hannah Pitanga Lukashok, Gilmara Coelho Meine, Isabele Avila Small, Roberto Luiz Teixeira de Carvalho, Denise Peixoto Guimarães, Gilberto Reynaldo Mansur.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a relatively simple and safe method of providing access for enteral feeding. The procedure is usually performed in hospitalized patients. The feasibility of PEG as an outpatient procedure has not been well estabilished in the medical literature. The main objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of PEG as an outpatient procedure in a selected group of head and neck cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, head and neck cancer subjects in good clinical condition were selected and enrolled in a close follow-up protocol of outpatient PEG. The clinical and demographic variables evaluated were age, gender, early complications, and timing of PEG.
RESULTS: Of a total of 136 PEG patients, 129 (94.8%) were discharged 3 h after the procedure. Three were excluded from the study and four were hospitalized because of moderate abdominal pain. The rate of minor complications was 17.6% (local pain, 7.4%; wound infection, 6.6%; abdominal pain, 2.9%; hematoma, 0.7%). Major complications occurred in 2.2% of the procedures (buried bumper syndrome, 1.5%; early tube displacement, 0.7%). There was no mortality.
CONCLUSION: Ambulatory placement of gastrostomy tubes is viable and safe in head and neck cancer patients in good clinical condition. The early complication rates are similar to those described for hospitalized patients. Unnecessary admissions are avoided and costs of hospitalization are reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19263126     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0381-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  28 in total

Review 1.  Complications of enteral access.

Authors:  Stephen A McClave; Wei-Kuo Chang
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Day-case (ambulatory) laparoscopic surgery. Let us sing from the same hymn sheet.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A randomized prospective trial of immediate vs. next-day feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in intensive care patients.

Authors:  Jurgen Stein; Arnd Schulte-Bockholt; Marion Sabin; Michael Keymling
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Day-case percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a viable proposition?

Authors:  A Mandal; A Steel; A R Davidson; C Ashby
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Early initiation of enteral feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement.

Authors:  Srinivasan Dubagunta; Christopher D Still; Arvind Kumar; Zahoor Makhdoom; Nicholas A Inverso; Ronald J Bross; Michael J Komar; Lisa Mulhisen; Joanne Z Rogers; Susan Whitmire; Bethann Whilden
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.080

6.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  J G Hunter; L Lauretano; P C Shellito
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Randomized prospective trial of early versus delayed feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement.

Authors:  T L McCarter; S C Condon; R C Aguilar; D J Gibson; Y K Chen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Technical modifications for improving the success rate of PEG tube placement in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  A Taller; E Horvath; L Iliás; Z Kótai; M Simig; J Elö; L Harsányi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a randomized prospective comparison of early and delayed feeding.

Authors:  U Choudhry; C J Barde; R Markert; N Gopalswamy
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy before multimodality therapy in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Marc Margolis; Pendleton Alexander; Gregory D Trachiotis; Farid Gharagozloo; Timothy Lipman
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of the pull and introducer percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy techniques in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Felipe A Retes; Fabio S Kawaguti; Marcelo S de Lima; Bruno da Costa Martins; Ricardo S Uemura; Gustavo A de Paulo; Caterina Mp Pennacchi; Carla Gusmon; Adriana Vs Ribeiro; Elisa R Baba; Sebastian N Geiger; Mauricio P Sorbello; Marco A Kulcsar; Ulysses Ribeiro; Fauze Maluf-Filho
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Observed high incidence of buried bumper syndrome associated with Freka PEG tubes.

Authors:  Joanna K Dowman; Linda Ditchburn; Warren Chapman; Par Lidder; Nicola Wootton; Nicola Ryan; Rachel M Cooney
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-25

3.  Current microbiology of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (PEG tube) insertion site infections in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth V I Rolston; Coralia Mihu; Jeffrey J Tarrand
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in cancer patients: predictors of 30-day complications, 30-day mortality, and overall mortality.

Authors:  David M Richards; Rajasekhar Tanikella; Gaurav Arora; Sushovan Guha; Alexander A Dekovich
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Pharyngocutaneous fistula as an alternative access route for inserting a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Louise Deluiz Verdolin Di Palma; Gustavo Francisco de Souza E Mello; Cindy Lis Granados; Ricardo Dardengo Glória; Caroline Sauter Dalbem; Rolantre Lopes da Cruz; Ana Carolina Maron Ayres; Renata Sofia Camara Lisboa; Alexandre Dias Pelosi; Maria Aparecida Ferreira; Gilberto Reynaldo Mansur; Simone Guaraldi da Silva; Theresa Christina Damian Ribeiro; Fernando Luiz Dias
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-07-06

6.  Computed tomography-guided percutaneous gastrostomy: initial experience at a cancer center.

Authors:  Chiang Jeng Tyng; Erich Frank Vater Santos; Luiz Felipe Alves Guerra; Almir Galvão Vieira Bitencourt; Paula Nicole Vieira Pinto Barbosa; Rubens Chojniak
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

Review 7.  Guidelines on pediatric day surgery of the Italian Societies of Pediatric Surgery (SICP) and Pediatric Anesthesiology (SARNePI).

Authors:  Ugo de Luca; Giovanni Mangia; Simonetta Tesoro; Ascanio Martino; Maria Sammartino; Alessandro Calisti
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.638

8.  Trends regarding percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A nationwide population-based study from 1997 to 2010.

Authors:  Wei-Kuo Chang; Kuen-Tze Lin; Chen-Liang Tsai; Chi-Hsiang Chung; Wu-Chien Chien; Chun-Shu Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.