Literature DB >> 9517650

Randomized prospective trial of early versus delayed feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement.

T L McCarter1, S C Condon, R C Aguilar, D J Gibson, Y K Chen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: By convention, most clinicians delay feeding through the gastrostomy tube until 24 h after placement. However, evidence is lacking to support the rationale for such a delay in PEG use. This randomized, prospective study was designed to assess the safety of early feeding after PEG placement.
METHODS: One hundred-twelve patients referred for PEG were randomized to begin tube feedings at 4 h (group A) or at 24 h (group B) after placement. All patients received prophylactic antibiotics. Full-strength Isocal was administered with the following schedule: day 1, 100 ml every 4 h for six feedings; day 2, 200 ml every 4 h for six feedings. Immediately before each scheduled feeding, gastric residual volume was recorded and the next feeding was withheld if the residual volume was > 50 percent (gastric retention). Patients were evaluated on day 1, day 2, day 7, and day 30 for major and minor complications.
RESULTS: The two groups were similar with regard to age, gender, baseline nutritional status, and indications for PEG placement. On the first day of feeding, 14 of 57 patients (25%) in group A, but only five of 55 patients (9%) in group B, had evidence of gastric retention, p = 0.029. The proportion of patients with high gastric residual volumes was not significantly different on day two. In group B, one death occurred because of aspiration of gastric contents on day 2. All other complications were minor and did not differ significantly between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Early initiation of PEG feedings is safe, well tolerated, and reduces cost by decreasing hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9517650     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00419.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  16 in total

1.  Early initiation of post-PEG feeding: do published recommendations affect clinical practice?

Authors:  R Srinivasan; R S Fisher
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Endoscopic placement of enteral feeding tubes.

Authors:  Gerard P Rafferty; Tony Ck Tham
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-05-16

Review 3.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a safe and effective bridge for enteral nutrition in neurological or non-neurological conditions.

Authors:  Rasim Gencosmanoglu
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 4.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children.

Authors:  Wael El-Matary
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  A comparative observational study of early versus delayed feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Manoj A Vyawahare; Mrunal Shirodkar; Amit Gharat; Prachi Patil; Shaesta Mehta; K M Mohandas
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-17

Review 6.  Gastroenteric tube feeding: techniques, problems and solutions.

Authors:  Irina Blumenstein; Yogesh M Shastri; Jürgen Stein
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Assessment of complication rates based on time of feeding initiation in radiologically guided gastrostomy tubes: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ryan Judd; Wesley Klejch; Alexander Lionberg; Mikin V Patel; Brian Funaki; Osman Ahmed
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.630

8.  Early initiation of enteral feeding in cancer patients after outpatient percutaneous fluoroscopy-guided gastrostomy catheter placement.

Authors:  Sharjeel H Sabir; Ryan Armstrong; Linda S Elting; Michael J Wallace; Sanjay Gupta; Alda L Tam
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Gastrostomy tube placement by radiological versus endoscopic methods in an acute care setting: a retrospective review of frequency, indications, complications and outcomes.

Authors:  Amy Galaski; Wei Wei Peng; Michelle Ellis; Pauline Darling; Andrew Common; Emma Tucker
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.522

10.  Outpatient percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in selected head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Gustavo Francisco de Souza e Mello; Hannah Pitanga Lukashok; Gilmara Coelho Meine; Isabele Avila Small; Roberto Luiz Teixeira de Carvalho; Denise Peixoto Guimarães; Gilberto Reynaldo Mansur
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.