| Literature DB >> 29530049 |
Ugo de Luca1, Giovanni Mangia2, Simonetta Tesoro3, Ascanio Martino4, Maria Sammartino5, Alessandro Calisti6.
Abstract
The Italian Society of Pediatric Surgery (SICP) together with The Italian Society of Pediatric Anesthesia (SARNePI) through a systematic analysis of the scientific literature, followed by a consensus conference held in Perugia on 2015, have produced some evidence based guidelines on the feasibility of day surgery in relation to different pediatric surgical procedures. The main aspects of the pre-operative assessment, appropriacy of operations and discharge are reported.Entities:
Keywords: Ambulatory surgery; Day case surgery; Day surgery; Guidelines; Outpatient
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29530049 PMCID: PMC5848546 DOI: 10.1186/s13052-018-0473-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ital J Pediatr ISSN: 1720-8424 Impact factor: 2.638
The CEVeAS Scale of the level of evidence of the proofs and the grades of recommendation
| LEVEL OF EVIDENCE (LE) |
|---|
| I Evidence obtained from several RCTs and/or reviews of RCT |
| II Evidence obtained from one RT adequately designed |
| III Evidence obtained from non randomized cohort studies with case/control or their methanalysis |
| IV Evidence obtained from case/control retrospective studies or their methanalysis |
| V Evidence obtained from series of cases without control group |
| VI Evidences obtained from experts advice, from consensus conferences, etc. |
| GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION (GR) |
| A Surgical or diagnostic procedures are strongly recommended because they are sustained by high level scientific evidence, even if not necessarily of type I or II |
| B It is doubtful that the procedure must be always recommended but it must be carefully considered |
| C There exists an element of uncertainty both in favor and against the recommendation |
| D The procedure is not recommended |
| E The procedure is strongly ill-advised |
Pre-Operative phase
| Question | Advise | Evidence | Grading Recomandation | Literature |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family or Social Status excluding Day Surgery | Parents reluctant or unable to take care of the child in the post-operative period at home. Poor domestic hygienic conditions. Lack of a telephone. House more than 1 h travelling distance from an hospital provided with a 24 h emergency facility. Absence of public transport | V | A | [ |
| Newborns | Full term newborns (Gestional Age Weeks > 38) of less than 1 month are excluded from Day Surgery. Exclusion should be preferably extended to at least 6 months of age. Infants from 2 to 6 months age could be included according to Structure Policy and Surgical Grading. | V | A | [ |
| ASA III Patients | Normally excluded from Day Surgery. May possibly be eventually included in relation to low surgical grading procedures. There needs to be, at any rate, a prolonged observation post-operatively before discharge. | III | C | [ |
| Patient with current Upper Respiratory Infection (URI) | Procedure must be postponed in relation to patients with major respiratory symptoms. If there are mild or moderate symptoms the procedure should be postponed if the child is of less than 1 year of age. In the case of older patients the risk factors should be considered and the appropriacy of the operation assessed in each case. | II | A | [ |
| Pre-Term | Infants PCA > 60 weeks. Clinically Stable. Anemia corrected. | II | A | [ |
| Evaluation of Timing | No pre-anesthesia assessment much in advance. An assessment is advisable shortly before the procedure. | V | B | [ |
| Lab Tests | Routine Lab Tests in healthy patients older than > 1 yr. have a low predictive value | I | A | [ |
| Medical Records | A parental anamnestic questionnaire is a good tool before any surgical procedure. | IV | C | [ |
| Pre-operative Fasting | The administration of clear fluids up to two hours before induction is advised. This lower the residual gastric volume and raise pH. | I | A | [ |
| Prevention of Nausea and Post-Operatory Vomiting (PONV) | PONV prevention requests a multifactorial approach that includes pre-operative identification of risk factors (family history, age > 3 yrs., Strabismus Repair and ORL surgery). In patients at risk prophylaxis is recommended (i.e.ondansetron 0.05 mg/kg + dexametason 0.015 mg/kg). | I | A | [ |
Intra-operative phase
| Question | Advise | Evidence | Grading | Literature |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No differences between the two techniques have been observed in causing PONV, emergence agitation and respiratory and hemodynamic complications, and in influencing the length of stay in the recovery unit. |
|
| [ | |
|
| Of all the loco-regional techniques, caudal block has shown the best results in the short and long term, although maintaining a significant risk of motor block and urinary retention |
|
| [ |
Discharge phase
| Question | Advise | Evidence | Grading Recomandation | Literature |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discharge (Ward to Home) | The Ped-PADSS score system was evaluated and found to be s simple, practical and suitable. It can also improve the patient flow thus reducing the duration of hospitalization. |
|
| [ |
|
| |
| INGUINAL HERNIAS: | |
| HYDROCELE: | |
| UNDESCENDED TESTIS | |
| VARICOCELE | |
|
| |
| LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA | |
| LAPAROSCOPY FOR INTRA-ABDOMINAL TESTIS | |
| LAPAROSCOPIC VARICOCE | |
|
| |
| INGUINAL HERNIA IN PRETERM INFANTS < 60 PCW: |
|
| |
| UMBILICAL HERNIA ( | |
| ALBA LINE HERNIA (EPIGASTRIC) ( | |
|
| |
| PERMAGNA UMBILICAL HERNIA IN INFANTS ( |
|
| |
| PHIMOSIS AND WEBBED PENIS ( | |
|
| |
| BURIED PENIS | |
| DISTAL HYPOSPADIA |
|
| |
| NEVI, TEGUMENTAL AND EPIFASCIAL LUMPS | |
|
| |
| PILONIDAL DISEASE PRIMARY CLOSURE OR PUNCH FISTULECTOMY |
|
| |
| TONGUE TIE | |
|
| |
| CLEFT LIP AND PALATE |
|
| |
| 2ND AND 3RD BRANCHIAL ARCH SINUSES, CYSTS AND FISTULAS | |
|
| |
| 1ST AND 4TH BRANCHIAL ARCH CYSTS |
|
| |
| APPENDECTOMY | |
|
| |
| GASTRIC FUNDOPLICATIO |
|
| |
| VESICO-URETERIC REFLUX | |
|
| |
| PYELOPLASTY |