Literature DB >> 8858322

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a randomized prospective comparison of early and delayed feeding.

U Choudhry1, C J Barde, R Markert, N Gopalswamy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been customary to initiate feeding through percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes 24 hours or more after placement of these tubes. Recent changes in practice environment and emphasis on early discharge of hospitalized patients prompted us to evaluate early PEG feeding in a randomized prospective manner.
METHODS: Forty-one patients were included in the study. After an informed consent, the patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Groups I (21 patients) received tube feedings 3 hours and Group II (20 patients) received feedings 24 hours after PEG placement. All patients received an Iso-osmolar formula by continuous infusion at 30 ml/hour for the first 24 hours of feeding. The rates were then increased to 70 ml/hour. Residual volumes, tube length, peristomal leakage, and vital signs were checked, and a global assessment was done every 4 hours. Evaluation by a physician was done every 24 hours for 72 hours. If the residual volume was more than 60 ml (significant residual volume), the tube feedings were held for 2 hours. Patients exited the study at 72 hours from the time of procedure. All deaths were recorded to calculate 30-day mortality.
RESULTS: One patient (Group 2) died during the study period. Three patients (two in Group 1 and one in Group 2) had a significant residual volume. One patient (Group 1) had local skin infection requiring treatment. None of the patients had any signs of peritonitis or systemic infection.
CONCLUSION: Early PEG tube feeding (3 hours after tube placement) is as safe as next day feeding in elderly patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8858322     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70134-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  18 in total

1.  Early initiation of post-PEG feeding: do published recommendations affect clinical practice?

Authors:  R Srinivasan; R S Fisher
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a safe and effective bridge for enteral nutrition in neurological or non-neurological conditions.

Authors:  Rasim Gencosmanoglu
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  A comparative observational study of early versus delayed feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Manoj A Vyawahare; Mrunal Shirodkar; Amit Gharat; Prachi Patil; Shaesta Mehta; K M Mohandas
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-17

Review 4.  Gastroenteric tube feeding: techniques, problems and solutions.

Authors:  Irina Blumenstein; Yogesh M Shastri; Jürgen Stein
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  [1997 gastroenterology update--II].

Authors:  W Fischbach; V Gross; J Schölmerich; C Ell; P Layer; W E Fleig
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-03-15

6.  Assessment of complication rates based on time of feeding initiation in radiologically guided gastrostomy tubes: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ryan Judd; Wesley Klejch; Alexander Lionberg; Mikin V Patel; Brian Funaki; Osman Ahmed
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.630

7.  Early initiation of enteral feeding in cancer patients after outpatient percutaneous fluoroscopy-guided gastrostomy catheter placement.

Authors:  Sharjeel H Sabir; Ryan Armstrong; Linda S Elting; Michael J Wallace; Sanjay Gupta; Alda L Tam
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 8.  Nutrition support in hospitalised adults at nutritional risk.

Authors:  Joshua Feinberg; Emil Eik Nielsen; Steven Kwasi Korang; Kirstine Halberg Engell; Marie Skøtt Nielsen; Kang Zhang; Maria Didriksen; Lisbeth Lund; Niklas Lindahl; Sara Hallum; Ning Liang; Wenjing Xiong; Xuemei Yang; Pernille Brunsgaard; Alexandre Garioud; Sanam Safi; Jane Lindschou; Jens Kondrup; Christian Gluud; Janus C Jakobsen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-19

9.  Gastrostomy tube placement by radiological versus endoscopic methods in an acute care setting: a retrospective review of frequency, indications, complications and outcomes.

Authors:  Amy Galaski; Wei Wei Peng; Michelle Ellis; Pauline Darling; Andrew Common; Emma Tucker
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.522

10.  Outpatient percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in selected head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Gustavo Francisco de Souza e Mello; Hannah Pitanga Lukashok; Gilmara Coelho Meine; Isabele Avila Small; Roberto Luiz Teixeira de Carvalho; Denise Peixoto Guimarães; Gilberto Reynaldo Mansur
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.