PURPOSE: To describe a phase II study design to evaluate the activity of novel anti-cancer agents that focuses on molecular pathogenesis rather than tumor histology. METHODS: We propose an enrichment design that enrolls patients across histologies expressing target X and incorporates randomized discontinuation of drug Y after an initial treatment period to evaluate for potential cystostatic activity. RESULTS: We are currently evaluating the activity of lapatinib in patients with HER-2 amplified solid tumors using the target-specific, histology-independent, randomized discontinuation design. Patients receive treatment with lapatinib for an initial 12-week period. After restaging, patients with disease progression are removed from study, patients achieving an objective response continue treatment, and patients with stable disease are randomized to continue lapatinib versus initiate treatment with placebo. The primary endpoints are to evaluate the objective response rate during the initial treatment period and to evaluate the proportion of patients progression-free 12 weeks post-randomization. CONCLUSION: The target-specific, histology-independent, randomized discontinuation design is an attractive alternative to the traditional phase II design for the development of "targeted" therapeutics.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To describe a phase II study design to evaluate the activity of novel anti-cancer agents that focuses on molecular pathogenesis rather than tumor histology. METHODS: We propose an enrichment design that enrolls patients across histologies expressing target X and incorporates randomized discontinuation of drug Y after an initial treatment period to evaluate for potential cystostatic activity. RESULTS: We are currently evaluating the activity of lapatinib in patients with HER-2 amplified solid tumors using the target-specific, histology-independent, randomized discontinuation design. Patients receive treatment with lapatinib for an initial 12-week period. After restaging, patients with disease progression are removed from study, patients achieving an objective response continue treatment, and patients with stable disease are randomized to continue lapatinib versus initiate treatment with placebo. The primary endpoints are to evaluate the objective response rate during the initial treatment period and to evaluate the proportion of patients progression-free 12 weeks post-randomization. CONCLUSION: The target-specific, histology-independent, randomized discontinuation design is an attractive alternative to the traditional phase II design for the development of "targeted" therapeutics.
Authors: Mark J Ratain; Tim Eisen; Walter M Stadler; Keith T Flaherty; Stan B Kaye; Gary L Rosner; Martin Gore; Apurva A Desai; Amita Patnaik; Henry Q Xiong; Eric Rowinsky; James L Abbruzzese; Chenghua Xia; Ronit Simantov; Brian Schwartz; Peter J O'Dwyer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-04-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael S Gordon; Daniela Matei; Carol Aghajanian; Ursula A Matulonis; Molly Brewer; Gini F Fleming; John D Hainsworth; Agustin A Garcia; Mark D Pegram; Russell J Schilder; David E Cohn; Lynda Roman; Mika K Derynck; Kimmie Ng; Benjamin Lyons; David E Allison; David A Eberhard; Thinh Q Pham; Randall C Dere; Beth Y Karlan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-08-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Bernard Escudier; Tim Eisen; Walter M Stadler; Cezary Szczylik; Stéphane Oudard; Michael Siebels; Sylvie Negrier; Christine Chevreau; Ewa Solska; Apurva A Desai; Frédéric Rolland; Tomasz Demkow; Thomas E Hutson; Martin Gore; Scott Freeman; Brian Schwartz; Minghua Shan; Ronit Simantov; Ronald M Bukowski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew H Kulke; Alona Muzikansky; Jeffrey Clark; Peter C Enzinger; Panos Fidias; Kate Kinsella; Ann Michelini; Charles S Fuchs Journal: Cancer Invest Date: 2006 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 2.176
Authors: Ingo K Mellinghoff; Maria Y Wang; Igor Vivanco; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Shaojun Zhu; Ederlyn Q Dia; Kan V Lu; Koji Yoshimoto; Julie H Y Huang; Dennis J Chute; Bridget L Riggs; Steve Horvath; Linda M Liau; Webster K Cavenee; P Nagesh Rao; Rameen Beroukhim; Timothy C Peck; Jeffrey C Lee; William R Sellers; David Stokoe; Michael Prados; Timothy F Cloughesy; Charles L Sawyers; Paul S Mischel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Howard I Scher; Michael J Morris; William K Kelly; Lawrence H Schwartz; Glenn Heller Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-07-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Rafael G Amado; Michael Wolf; Marc Peeters; Eric Van Cutsem; Salvatore Siena; Daniel J Freeman; Todd Juan; Robert Sikorski; Sid Suggs; Robert Radinsky; Scott D Patterson; David D Chang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Matthew D Galsky; Daniel D Von Hoff; Marcus Neubauer; Thomas Anderson; Mark Fleming; Yasir Nagarwala; Janine M Mahoney; Dawn Midwinter; Linda Vocila; Tal Z Zaks Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 3.850