Literature DB >> 12431972

Randomized discontinuation design: application to cytostatic antineoplastic agents.

Gary L Rosner1, Walter Stadler, Mark J Ratain.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Propose a phase II study design to evaluate the activity of a putative cytostatic agent, acknowledging heterogeneity of tumor growth rates in the population of patients.
METHODS: In the setting of renal cell carcinoma, some patients' tumors will grow slowly naturally. An appropriate design has to distinguish antiproliferative activity attributable to the novel agent from indolent disease. We propose a randomized discontinuation design that initially treats all patients with the study agent (stage 1) and then randomizes in a double-blind fashion to continuing therapy or placebo only those patients whose disease is stable (stage 2). This design allows the investigators to determine if apparent slow tumor growth is attributable to the drug or to selection of patients with naturally slow-growing tumors.
RESULTS: By selecting a more homogeneous population, the randomized portion of the study requires fewer patients than would a study randomizing all patients at entry. The design also avoids potential confounding because of heterogeneous tumor growth. Because the two randomly assigned treatment groups each comprise patients with apparently slow growing tumors, any difference between the groups in disease progression after randomization is more likely a result of the study drug and less likely a result of imbalance with respect to tumor growth rates. Stopping rules during the initial open-label stage and the subsequent randomized trial stage allow one to reduce the overall sample size. Expected average tumor growth rate is an important consideration when deciding the duration of follow-up for the two stages.
CONCLUSION: The randomized discontinuation design is a feasible alternative phase II study design for determining activity of possibly cytostatic anticancer agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12431972     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.11.126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  35 in total

Review 1.  Imaging-based tumor treatment response evaluation: review of conventional, new, and emerging concepts.

Authors:  Hee Kang; Ho Yun Lee; Kyung Soo Lee; Jae-Hun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 2.  Novel kinase inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma: progressive development of static agents.

Authors:  Apurva A Desai; Walter M Stadler
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Run-in phase III trial design with pharmacodynamics predictive biomarkers.

Authors:  Fangxin Hong; Richard Simon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Targeted therapies for gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Johnny Hyde; D Scott McMeekin
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2005-03

Review 5.  The von Hippel-Lindau gene: turning discovery into therapy.

Authors:  Peter E Clark; Michael S Cookson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Point/counterpoint: randomized versus single-arm phase II clinical trials for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors:  Stuart A Grossman; Karisa C Schreck; Karla Ballman; Brian Alexander
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Melanoma Who Discontinued Treatment With Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Because of Adverse Events: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Phase II and III Trials.

Authors:  Dirk Schadendorf; Jedd D Wolchok; F Stephen Hodi; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Rene Gonzalez; Piotr Rutkowski; Jean-Jacques Grob; C Lance Cowey; Christopher D Lao; Jason Chesney; Caroline Robert; Kenneth Grossmann; David McDermott; Dana Walker; Rafia Bhore; James Larkin; Michael A Postow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The design of phase II clinical trials testing cancer therapeutics: consensus recommendations from the clinical trial design task force of the national cancer institute investigational drug steering committee.

Authors:  Lesley Seymour; S Percy Ivy; Daniel Sargent; David Spriggs; Laurence Baker; Larry Rubinstein; Mark J Ratain; Michael Le Blanc; David Stewart; John Crowley; Susan Groshen; Jeffrey S Humphrey; Pamela West; Donald Berry
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Rationale for targeted therapies and potential role of pazopanib in advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Peter E Clark
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2010-08-09

Review 10.  Randomized phase II designs.

Authors:  Larry Rubinstein; John Crowley; Percy Ivy; Michael Leblanc; Dan Sargent
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.