Literature DB >> 19258087

Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Morgan L Brown1, Stephen H McKellar, Thoralf M Sundt, Hartzell V Schaff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Most aortic valve replacements are by conventional full median sternotomy. Less invasive approaches have been developed with partial upper sternotomy (ministernotomy).
METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis were performed with studies comparing ministernotomy and full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.
RESULTS: Twenty-six studies were selected, with 4586 patients with aortic valve replacement (2054 ministernotomy, 2532 full sternotomy). There was no difference in mortality (odds ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.49-1.02). Ministernotomy had longer crossclamp and bypass times (weighted mean difference 7.90 minutes, 95% confidence interval 3.50-10.29 minutes, and 11.46 minutes, 95% confidence interval 5.26-17.65 minutes, respectively). Both intensive care unit and hospital stays were shorter with ministernotomy (weighted mean difference -0.46 days, 95% confidence interval -0.72 to -0.20 days, and -0.91 days, 95% confidence interval -1.45 to -0.37 days, respectively). Ministernotomy had shorter ventilation time and less blood loss within 24 hours (weighted mean difference -2.1 hours, 95% confidence interval -2.95 to -1.30 hours, and -79 mL, 95% confidence interval -23 to 136 mL, respectively). Randomized studies tended to demonstrate no difference between ministernotomy and full sternotomy. Rate of conversion from partial to conventional sternotomy was 3.0% (95% confidence interval 1.8%-.4%).
CONCLUSION: Ministernotomy can be performed safely for aortic valve replacement, without increased risk of death or other major complication; however, few objective advantages have been shown. Surgeons must conduct well-designed, prospective studies of relevant, consistent clinical outcomes to determine the role of ministernotomy in cardiac surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19258087     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  76 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive heart valve surgery: how and why in 2012.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Nassir M Thalji
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Minimally Invasive Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement With the Perceval S Bioprosthesis Through Ministernotomy: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Krishan Ramsaransing; Vikash Hindori; Athiná Kougioumtzoglou; Abdullah Kaya; Eva Verbeek
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-10-28

3.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: 12-year single center experience.

Authors:  Daniyar Gilmanov; Marco Solinas; Pier Andrea Farneti; Alfredo Giuseppe Cerillo; Enkel Kallushi; Filippo Santarelli; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 4.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery through lower half sternotomy.

Authors:  James R Fenton; John R Doty
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement International Registry (SU-AVR-IR): design and rationale from the International Valvular Surgery Study Group (IVSSG).

Authors:  Marco Di Eusanio; Kevin Phan; Denis Bouchard; Thierry P Carrel; Otto E Dapunt; Roberto Di Bartolomeo; Harald C Eichstaedt; Theodor Fischlein; Thierry Folliguet; Borut Gersak; Mattia Glauber; Axel Haverich; Martin Misfeld; Peter J Oberwalder; Giuseppe Santarpino; Malakh Lal Shrestha; Marco Solinas; Marco Vola; Francesco Alamanni; Alberto Albertini; Gopal Bhatnagar; Michel Carrier; Stephen Clark; Federic Collart; Utz Kappert; Alfred Kocher; Bart Meuris; Carmelo Mignosa; Ahmed Ouda; Marc Pelletier; Parwis Baradaran Rahmanian; David Reineke; Kevin Teoh; Giovanni Troise; Emmanuel Villa; Thorsten Wahlers; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 6.  Sutureless aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Marco Di Eusanio; Kevin Phan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 7.  Aortic valve replacement with a rapid deployment Edwards Intuity bioprosthesis using a completely video-guided approach.

Authors:  Tommaso Hinna Danesi; Giovanni Domenico Cresce; Alessandro Favaro; Massimo Bilotta; Loris Salvador
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 8.  Ministernotomy or minithoracotomy for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Ashleigh Xie; Yi-Chin Tsai; Deborah Black; Marco Di Eusanio; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

9.  Complications and conversions in minimally invasive aortic valve surgery.

Authors:  Martin Moscoso Ludueña; Ardawan J Rastan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

10.  Video assisted right mini-thoracotomy for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Carl A Johnson; Amber L Melvin; Brandon F Lebow; Amanda Yap; Peter A Knight
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.