Literature DB >> 25870812

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: 12-year single center experience.

Daniyar Gilmanov1, Marco Solinas1, Pier Andrea Farneti1, Alfredo Giuseppe Cerillo1, Enkel Kallushi1, Filippo Santarelli1, Mattia Glauber1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study reports the single center experience on minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR), performed through a right anterior minithoracotomy or ministernotomy (MS).
METHODS: Eight hundred and fifty-three patients, who underwent MIAVR from 2002 to 2014, were retrospectively analyzed. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox multivariable proportional hazards regression model was developed to identify independent predictors of follow-up mortality.
RESULTS: Median age was 73.8, and 405 (47.5%) of patients were female. The overall 30-day mortality was 1.9%. Four hundred and forty-three (51.9%) and 368 (43.1%) patients received biological and sutureless prostheses, respectively. Median cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamping time were 108 and 75 minutes, respectively. Nineteen (2.2%) cases required conversion to full median sternotomy. Thirty-seven (4.3%) patients required re-exploration for bleeding. Perioperative stroke occurred in 15 (1.8%) patients, while transient ischemic attack occurred postoperative in 11 (1.3%). New onset atrial fibrillation was reported for 243 (28.5%) patients. After a median follow-up of 29.1 months (2,676.0 patient-years), survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 96%±1% and 80%±3%, respectively. Cox multivariable analysis showed that advanced age, history of cardiac arrhythmia, preoperative chronic renal failure, MS approach, prolonged mechanical ventilation and hospital stay as well as wound revision were associated with higher mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: MIAVR via both approaches is safe and feasible with excellent outcomes, and is associated with low conversion rate and low perioperative morbidity. Long term survival is at least comparable to that reported for conventional sternotomy AVR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve replacement (AVR); heart valve prosthesis; minimally invasive heart surgery; outcomes

Year:  2015        PMID: 25870812      PMCID: PMC4384246          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.12.05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 2225-319X


  41 in total

Review 1.  Is ministernotomy superior to conventional approach for aortic valve replacement?

Authors:  Marco Scarci; Christopher Young; Hazem Fallouh
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-05-15

2.  Prospective comparison between total sternotomy and ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Fadi Farhat; Zhiqian Lu; Mathilde Lefevre; Pietro Montagna; Philippe Mikaeloff; Olivier Jegaden
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.620

Review 3.  Sutureless aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Yi-Chin Tsai; Nithya Niranjan; Denis Bouchard; Thierry P Carrel; Otto E Dapunt; Harald C Eichstaedt; Theodor Fischlein; Borut Gersak; Mattia Glauber; Axel Haverich; Martin Misfeld; Peter J Oberwalder; Giuseppe Santarpino; Malakh Lal Shrestha; Marco Solinas; Marco Vola; Tristan D Yan; Marco Di Eusanio
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

4.  Propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Arudo Hiraoka; Toshinori Totsugawa; Masahiko Kuinose; Kosuke Nakajima; Genta Chikazawa; Kentaro Tamura; Hidenori Yoshitaka; Taichi Sakaguchi
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.993

5.  Minimal invasive aortic valve replacement surgery is associated with improved survival: a propensity-matched comparison.

Authors:  Denis R Merk; Sven Lehmann; David M Holzhey; Pascal Dohmen; Pascal Candolfi; Martin Misfeld; Friedrich W Mohr; Michael A Borger
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Ministernotomy versus median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  A Aris; M L Cámara; J Montiel; L J Delgado; J Galán; H Litvan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: matched propensity score analysis of 808 patients.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Furukawa; Oliver Kuss; Anas Aboud; Michael Schönbrodt; Andre Renner; Kavous Hakim Meibodi; Tobias Becker; Amin Zittermann; Jan F Gummert; Jochen Börgermann
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 8.  Surgical management of minimally invasive aortic valve operations.

Authors:  William F Johnston; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2011-12-22

9.  Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve operations: a prospective study in 120 patients.

Authors:  H E Mächler; P Bergmann; M Anelli-Monti; D Dacar; P Rehak; I Knez; L Salaymeh; E Mahla; B Rigler
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matched study.

Authors:  Mattia Glauber; Antonio Miceli; Daniyar Gilmanov; Matteo Ferrarini; Stefano Bevilacqua; Pier A Farneti; Marco Solinas
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  7 in total

1.  Stonehenge technique is associated with faster aortic clamp time in group of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via right infra-axillary thoracotomy.

Authors:  Masataka Yamazaki; Akihiro Yoshitake; Tatsuo Takahashi; Tsutomu Ito; Naritaka Kimura; Akinori Hirano; Yasunori Iida; Shuichiro Takanashi; Hideyuki Shimizu
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-08-16

2.  Surgery of the Ascending Aorta with or without Combined Procedures through an Upper Ministernotomy: Outcomes of a Series of More Than 100 Patients.

Authors:  Salvatore Lentini; Luigi Specchia; Salvatore Nicolardi; Federica Mangia; Olivera Rasovic; Giuseppe Di Eusanio; Renato Gregorini
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 1.520

3.  Right ventricular mechanics and contractility after aortic valve replacement surgery: a randomised study comparing minimally invasive versus conventional approach.

Authors:  Nashmil Hashemi; Jonas Johnson; Lars-Åke Brodin; Andreia Gomes-Bernardes; Ulrik Sartipy; Peter Svenarud; Magnus Dalén; Magnus Bäck; Mahbubul Alam; Reidar Winter
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2018-07-23

4.  Minimal invasive aortic valve replacement: associations of radiological assessments with procedure complexity.

Authors:  Bruce R Boti; Vikash G Hindori; Emilio L Schade; Athina M Kougioumtzoglou; Eva C Verbeek; Annet Driessen-Waaijer; Riccardo Cocchieri; Bas A J M de Mol; Nils R Planken; Abdullah Kaya; Henk A Marquering
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 5.  Does minimal invasive cardiac surgery reduce the incidence of post-operative atrial fibrillation?

Authors:  Maria Maimari; Nikolaos G Baikoussis; Stelios Gaitanakis; Anna Dalipi-Triantafillou; Andreas Katsaros; Charilaos Kantsos; Vasileios Lozos; Konstantinos Triantafillou
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar

6.  Converging rapid deployment prostheses with minimal access surgery: analysis of early outcomes.

Authors:  M Yousuf Salmasi; Kristo Papa; David Mozalbat; Muhammad Ashraf; Alicja Zientara; Ishaan Chauhan; Nikoleta Karadatkou; Thanos Athanasiou; Isabelle Roussin; Cesare Quarto; George Asimakopoulos
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 1.637

7.  Efficacy of Aortic Valve Replacement through Full Sternotomy and Minimal Invasion (Ministernotomy).

Authors:  Hammad M A Aliahmed; Rimantas Karalius; Arūnas Valaika; Arimantas Grebelis; Palmyra Semėnienė; Rasa Čypienė
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 2.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.