Literature DB >> 19255623

High Resolution Separations and Improved Ion Production and Transmission in Metabolomics.

Thomas O Metz1, Jason S Page, Erin S Baker, Keqi Tang, Jie Ding, Yufeng Shen, Richard D Smith.   

Abstract

The goal of metabolomics analyses is the detection and quantitation of as many sample components as reasonably possible in order to identify compounds or "features" that can be used to characterize the samples under study. When utilizing electrospray ionization to produce ions for analysis by mass spectrometry (MS), it is important that metabolome sample constituents be efficiently separated prior to ion production, in order to minimize ionization suppression and thereby extend the dynamic range of the measurement, as well as the coverage of the metabolome. Similarly, optimization of the MS inlet and interface can lead to increased measurement sensitivity. This perspective review will focus on the role of high resolution liquid chromatography (LC) separations in conjunction with improved ion production and transmission for LC-MS-based metabolomics. Additional emphasis will be placed on the compromise between metabolome coverage and sample analysis throughput.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19255623      PMCID: PMC2625305          DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2007.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem        ISSN: 0165-9936            Impact factor:   12.296


  53 in total

1.  Improved ion transmission from atmospheric pressure to high vacuum using a multicapillary inlet and electrodynamic ion funnel interface

Authors: 
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Effect of different solution flow rates on analyte ion signals in nano-ESI MS, or: when does ESI turn into nano-ESI?

Authors:  Andrea Schmidt; Michael Karas; Thomas Dülcks
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Automated high-resolution gas chromatographic system for recording and evaluation of metabolic profiles.

Authors:  M L McConnell; M Novotný
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1975-10-29

4.  Incorporation of a venturi device in electrospray ionization.

Authors:  Li Zhou; Bingfang Yue; David V Dearden; Edgar D Lee; Alan L Rockwood; Milton L Lee
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 5.  Ultrasensitive and quantitative analyses from combined separations-mass spectrometry for the characterization of proteomes.

Authors:  Richard D Smith; Yufeng Shen; Keqi Tang
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 22.384

6.  Improved liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry performance in quantitative analysis using a nanosplitter interface.

Authors:  Christine L Andrews; Chung-Ping Yu; Eric Yang; Paul Vouros
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 4.759

7.  Two-dimensional gas-phase separations coupled to mass spectrometry for analysis of complex mixtures.

Authors:  Keqi Tang; Fumin Li; Alexandre A Shvartsburg; Eric F Strittmatter; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Acceptance Criteria for Ultratrace HPLC-Tandem Mass Spectrometry:  Quantitative and Qualitative Determination of Sulfonylurea Herbicides in Soil.

Authors:  L Y Li; D A Campbell; P K Bennett; J Henion
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Characterization of mycobacteria species by HPLC and pattern recognition.

Authors:  L S Ramos
Journal:  J Chromatogr Sci       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.618

10.  Physical/chemical separations in the break-up of highly charged droplets from electrosprays.

Authors:  K Tang; R D Smith
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.262

View more
  10 in total

1.  Enhancing bottom-up and top-down proteomic measurements with ion mobility separations.

Authors:  Erin Shammel Baker; Kristin E Burnum-Johnson; Yehia M Ibrahim; Daniel J Orton; Matthew E Monroe; Ryan T Kelly; Ronald J Moore; Xing Zhang; Roger Théberge; Catherine E Costello; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  Revisiting Protocols for the NMR Analysis of Bacterial Metabolomes.

Authors:  Steven Halouska; Bo Zhang; Rosmarie Gaupp; Shulei Lei; Emily Snell; Robert J Fenton; Raul G Barletta; Greg A Somerville; Robert Powers
Journal:  J Integr OMICS       Date:  2013-12

Review 3.  Beyond the paradigm: Combining mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance for metabolomics.

Authors:  Darrell D Marshall; Robert Powers
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 9.795

Review 4.  Review on ion mobility spectrometry. Part 2: hyphenated methods and effects of experimental parameters.

Authors:  R Cumeras; E Figueras; C E Davis; J I Baumbach; I Gràcia
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 4.616

Review 5.  Review on ion mobility spectrometry. Part 1: current instrumentation.

Authors:  R Cumeras; E Figueras; C E Davis; J I Baumbach; I Gràcia
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 4.616

6.  Combining DI-ESI-MS and NMR datasets for metabolic profiling.

Authors:  Darrell D Marshall; Shulei Lei; Bradley Worley; Yuting Huang; Aracely Garcia-Garcia; Rodrigo Franco; Eric D Dodds; Robert Powers
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.290

7.  An LC-IMS-MS platform providing increased dynamic range for high-throughput proteomic studies.

Authors:  Erin Shammel Baker; Eric A Livesay; Daniel J Orton; Ronald J Moore; William F Danielson; David C Prior; Yehia M Ibrahim; Brian L LaMarche; Anoop M Mayampurath; Athena A Schepmoes; Derek F Hopkins; Keqi Tang; Richard D Smith; Mikhail E Belov
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Ion Mobility Spectrometry and the Omics: Distinguishing Isomers, Molecular Classes and Contaminant Ions in Complex Samples.

Authors:  Kristin E Burnum-Johnson; Xueyun Zheng; James N Dodds; Jeremy Ash; Denis Fourches; Carrie D Nicora; Jason P Wendler; Thomas O Metz; Katrina M Waters; Janet K Jansson; Richard D Smith; Erin S Baker
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 12.296

9.  Metabolomics data normalization with EigenMS.

Authors:  Yuliya V Karpievitch; Sonja B Nikolic; Richard Wilson; James E Sharman; Lindsay M Edwards
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Integrating ion mobility spectrometry into mass spectrometry-based exposome measurements: what can it add and how far can it go?

Authors:  Thomas O Metz; Erin S Baker; Emma L Schymanski; Ryan S Renslow; Dennis G Thomas; Tim J Causon; Ian K Webb; Stephan Hann; Richard D Smith; Justin G Teeguarden
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.681

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.