Literature DB >> 19254194

Morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer who become nonambulatory after spinal cord compression: a case series on end-of-life care.

Jocelin Huang1, Aminah Jatoi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have focused on the outcomes of nonambulatory patients diagnosed with spinal cord compression from metastatic cancer. The purpose of this study was to review the morbidity and mortality suffered by these patients.
METHODS: Over a 10-year period (1996-2006), a retrospective review was undertaken to assess the outcomes of 39 nonambulatory patients diagnosed with spinal cord compression from metastatic cancer.
RESULTS: Treatment for cord compression included corticosteroids (n = 33), radiation (n = 25), and surgical decompression (n = 13). Nonetheless, 23 patients (59%) required bowel and/or bladder catheterization, and 33 (85%) required pain medications. Twenty-five (64%) did not regain ambulation. Only 13 patients (33%) went home without assistance. In contrast, 10 (26%) were transferred to a nursing home, 6 (15%) were sent home with hospice, 5 (13%) went home with home health care, and 1 (3%) was moved to a hospice inpatient facility. At the time of this report, all patients had died with a median survival of 76 days (range, 4-1975 days). Long-term survivors who lived beyond a year were primarily patients who had regained ambulation.
CONCLUSION: Metastatic cord compression causes severe morbidity and compromised survival in patients who become nonambulatory. Future palliative care efforts should focus on further characterizing and addressing these needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19254194      PMCID: PMC2988456          DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2008.0231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  8 in total

1.  Outcome of malignant spinal cord compression at a cancer center: implications for palliative care services.

Authors:  J Cowap; J R Hardy; R A'Hern
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging in suspected metastatic spinal cord compression.

Authors:  M P Williams; G R Cherryman; J E Husband
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  The role of MR imaging in evaluating metastatic spinal disease.

Authors:  W R Smoker; J C Godersky; R K Knutzon; W D Keyes; D Norman; W Bergman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Systematic review of the diagnosis and management of malignant extradural spinal cord compression: the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative's Neuro-Oncology Disease Site Group.

Authors:  D Andrew Loblaw; James Perry; Alexandra Chambers; Normand J Laperriere
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal cord and canal: potentials and limitations.

Authors:  D Norman; C M Mills; M Brant-Zawadzki; A Yeates; L E Crooks; L Kaufman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Prognostic factors in metastatic spinal cord compression: a prospective study using multivariate analysis of variables influencing survival and gait function in 153 patients.

Authors:  S Helweg-Larsen; P S Sørensen; S Kreiner
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  What happens to people after malignant cord compression? Survival, function, quality of life, emotional well-being and place of care 1 month after diagnosis.

Authors:  R Conway; J Graham; J Kidd; P Levack
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.126

8.  Malignant spinal cord compression: a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  S Turner; B Marosszeky; I Timms; J Boyages
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1993-04-30       Impact factor: 7.038

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Non-pharmacological interventions in patients with spinal cord compression: a systematic review.

Authors:  María Paniagua-Collado; Omar Cauli
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  Anti-metastatic functions of type 1 interferons: Foundation for the adjuvant therapy of cancer.

Authors:  Angélica Ortiz; Serge Y Fuchs
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.861

Review 3.  Surgical Intervention vs. Radiation Therapy: The Shifting Paradigm in Treating Metastatic Spinal Disease.

Authors:  Robert Le; Jeremy D Tran; Mel Lizaso; Ramin Beheshti; Austin Moats
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-10-03

Review 4.  An Overview of Decision Making in the Management of Metastatic Spinal Tumors.

Authors:  Gautam R Zaveri; Reetu Jain; Nishank Mehta; Bhavuk Garg
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 1.251

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.