Literature DB >> 17305255

What happens to people after malignant cord compression? Survival, function, quality of life, emotional well-being and place of care 1 month after diagnosis.

R Conway, J Graham, J Kidd, P Levack.   

Abstract

AIMS: To present further findings from the Scottish Cord Compression Study, in which the diagnosis, management and outcome of 319 patients with a definitive diagnosis of malignant cord compression (MCC) were examined.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 256 (80%) patients in the study consented to be interviewed shortly after diagnosis and at follow-up interviews. One hundred and twenty-eight patients were interviewed 1 month after diagnosis (40% of the total; 57% [128/224] of patients alive 1 month after diagnosis; 68% [128/188] of patients who also consented to follow-up). Survival data of the whole MCC population and data from interviewing 128 patients 1 month after diagnosis are presented.
RESULTS: The median survival of all patients was 59 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 43-75 days). The median Karnofsky performance status was 50 (interquartile range 40-60), indicating a need for considerable nursing and medical care, and was poorest for patients with lung cancer (median 40; interquartile range 30-60). The place of care was dependent on mobility at diagnosis; patients walking at diagnosis were more likely to be at home, whereas patient requiring assistance or who were unable to walk were more likely to be in institutional care (P = 0.019). Mobility and bladder function were determined by mobility and bladder function at diagnosis (P < 0.001). Of those unable to walk at diagnosis, 7% regained full mobility. Of those catheterised at presentation, 28% regained full bladder function. Forty-seven per cent (56/120, 95% CI 40-54) of patients interviewed were in pain despite oncological treatment and 18% (22/ 120; 95% CI 8-19) reported the pain as severe (visual analogue scale > 7). The median quality-of-life (Schedule for Evaluation of Individualised Quality of Life) score was 72/100, and was higher in patients with a better performance status (P = 0.026). A minority of patients (8%) screened positive for anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale.
CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding the difficulties in following up this group of patients, this paper reports valuable findings detailing the experience of patients with MCC 1 month after diagnosis and treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17305255     DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2006.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  12 in total

1.  Morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer who become nonambulatory after spinal cord compression: a case series on end-of-life care.

Authors:  Jocelin Huang; Aminah Jatoi
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 2.  Rehabilitation and treatment of spinal cord tumors.

Authors:  Vishwa S Raj; Latanya Lofton
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Long-term survivors after surgical management of metastatic spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Emeline Tabouret; G Gravis; C Cauvin; A Loundou; T Adetchessi; S Fuentes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Survival after rehabilitation for spinal cord injury due to tumor: a 12-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Michael Tan; Peter New
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Patient's experiences of being discharged home from hospital following a diagnosis of malignant spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Jane Manson; Clare Warnock; Lesley Crowther
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Effects of gender on inpatient rehabilitation outcomes in the elderly with incomplete paraplegia from nontraumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Elizabeth Kay; Anne Deutsch; David Chen; Patrick Semik; Diane Rowles
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 7.  Prognostic factors in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression secondary to lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Gustavo Telles da Silva; Anke Bergmann; Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Pain and quality of life in patients undergoing radiotherapy for spinal metastatic disease treatment.

Authors:  Edgar S Valesin Filho; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; Guilherme Hv Lima; Daniel Ig de Cubero; Fabrício H Ueno; Gustavo Sl Figueiredo; Vitor E Valenti; Carlos Bandeira de Mello Monteiro; Rubens Wajnsztejn; Edison N Fujiki; Modesto Rolim Neto; Luciano M Rodrigues
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2013-02-18

9.  Radiotherapy or surgery for spine metastases?

Authors:  Olga Zaikova; Sophie D Fosså; Oyvind S Bruland; Karl-Erik Giercksky; Berit Sandstad; Sigmund Skjeldal
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Suspected malignant cord compression - improving time to diagnosis via a 'hotline': a prospective audit.

Authors:  L Allan; L Baker; J Dewar; S Eljamel; R M Grant; J G Houston; T McLeay; A J Munro; P Levack
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.