OBJECTIVES: The main goal was to investigate the relationship between prenatal sonographic parameters and birth weight in predicting neonatal body composition. METHODS: Standard fetal biometry and soft tissue parameters were assessed prospectively in third-trimester pregnancies using three-dimensional ultrasonography. Growth parameters included biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), mid-thigh circumference and femoral diaphysis length (FDL). Soft tissue parameters included fractional arm volume (AVol) and fractional thigh volume (TVol) that were derived from 50% of the humeral or femoral diaphysis lengths, respectively. Percentage of neonatal body fat (%BF) was determined within 48 h of delivery using a pediatric air displacement plethysmography system based on principles of whole-body densitometry. Correlation and stepwise multiple linear regression analyses were performed with potential prenatal predictors and %BF as the outcome variable. RESULTS: Eighty-seven neonates were studied with a mean +/- SD %BF of 10.6 +/- 4.6%. TVol had the greatest correlation with newborn %BF of all single-parameter models. This parameter alone explained 46.1% of the variability in %BF and the best stepwise multiple linear regression model was: %BF = 0.129 (TVol) - 1.03933 (P < 0.001). Birth weight similarly explained 44.7% of the variation in %BF. AC and estimated fetal weight (EFW) accounted for only 24.8% and 30.4% of the variance in %BF, respectively. Skeletal growth parameters, such as FDL (14.2%), HC (7.9%) and BPD (4.0%), contributed the least towards explaining the variance in %BF. CONCLUSIONS: During the late third trimester of pregnancy %BF is most highly correlated with TVol. Similar to actual birth weight, this soft tissue parameter accounts for a significant improvement in explaining the variation in neonatal %BF compared with fetal AC or EFW alone. (c) 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OBJECTIVES: The main goal was to investigate the relationship between prenatal sonographic parameters and birth weight in predicting neonatal body composition. METHODS: Standard fetal biometry and soft tissue parameters were assessed prospectively in third-trimester pregnancies using three-dimensional ultrasonography. Growth parameters included biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), mid-thigh circumference and femoral diaphysis length (FDL). Soft tissue parameters included fractional arm volume (AVol) and fractional thigh volume (TVol) that were derived from 50% of the humeral or femoral diaphysis lengths, respectively. Percentage of neonatal body fat (%BF) was determined within 48 h of delivery using a pediatric air displacement plethysmography system based on principles of whole-body densitometry. Correlation and stepwise multiple linear regression analyses were performed with potential prenatal predictors and %BF as the outcome variable. RESULTS: Eighty-seven neonates were studied with a mean +/- SD %BF of 10.6 +/- 4.6%. TVol had the greatest correlation with newborn %BF of all single-parameter models. This parameter alone explained 46.1% of the variability in %BF and the best stepwise multiple linear regression model was: %BF = 0.129 (TVol) - 1.03933 (P < 0.001). Birth weight similarly explained 44.7% of the variation in %BF. AC and estimated fetal weight (EFW) accounted for only 24.8% and 30.4% of the variance in %BF, respectively. Skeletal growth parameters, such as FDL (14.2%), HC (7.9%) and BPD (4.0%), contributed the least towards explaining the variance in %BF. CONCLUSIONS: During the late third trimester of pregnancy %BF is most highly correlated with TVol. Similar to actual birth weight, this soft tissue parameter accounts for a significant improvement in explaining the variation in neonatal %BF compared with fetal AC or EFW alone. (c) 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Alessandra Padoan; Serena Rigano; Enrico Ferrazzi; Brenda L Beaty; Frederick C Battaglia; Henry L Galan Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: C M Bilardo; H Wolf; R H Stigter; Y Ville; E Baez; G H A Visser; K Hecher Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: S Ikenoue; F Waffarn; K Sumiyoshi; M Ohashi; C Ikenoue; C Buss; D L Gillen; H N Simhan; S Entringer; P D Wadhwa Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Russell L Deter; Wesley Lee; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Adi L Tarca; Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero Journal: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Date: 2014-07-11