Literature DB >> 14770389

Relationship between monitoring parameters and perinatal outcome in severe, early intrauterine growth restriction.

C M Bilardo1, H Wolf, R H Stigter, Y Ville, E Baez, G H A Visser, K Hecher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether pathological changes in the umbilical artery (UA), ductus venosus (DV) and short-term fetal heart variation are related to perinatal outcome in severe, early intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR).
METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, longitudinal, observational study was carried out in the Departments of Fetal Medicine and Obstetrics in Hamburg, Amsterdam, Utrecht and London. In 70 singleton pregnancies with IUGR fetuses, delivered at 26-33 weeks of gestation because of antepartum fetal distress, short-term variation (STV) of fetal heart rate, pulsatility index of the fetal UA (UA PI) and DV pulsatility index for veins (DV PIV) were assessed at least weekly. The final measurement was performed within 24 h of delivery. Standard cut-off levels (2 SD or 3 SD, absent flow or reversed flow) were used and new cut-off levels were calculated by means of receiver-operating characteristics analysis. Adverse outcome was defined as perinatal death, cerebral hemorrhage (> or = Grade II) or bronchopulmonary dysplasia before discharge. The predictive value for adverse outcome was calculated for different cut-off levels of the monitoring parameters, adjusted for gestational age (GA), by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Data were analyzed separately for three different time blocks, namely 8-14, 2-7 and 0-1 days before delivery.
RESULTS: Adverse perinatal outcome occurred in 18/70 (26%) infants. During the last 24 h before delivery DV PIV and UA PI were significantly higher and STV lower in the adverse outcome group, while 2-7 days before delivery only DV PIV was significantly higher. Adverse perinatal outcome could be predicted at 0-1 days before delivery by DV PIV at a cut-off of three multiples of the SD (odds ratio (OR) 11.3; 95% CI 2.3-57) and GA (OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.3-0.8), at 2-7 days by DV PIV at 2 SD (OR 3.0; 95% CI 0.8-12) and GA (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.8) and at 8-14 days by DV PIV at 2 SD (OR 3.9; 95% CI 0.8-20) and GA (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.8). Other parameters did not contribute to the multivariate model.
CONCLUSIONS: DV PIV measurement is the best predictor of perinatal outcome. This measurement may be useful in timing the delivery of early IUGR fetuses and in improving perinatal outcome, even when delivery may be indicated at an earlier GA. However, as GA was also an important factor influencing outcome, with poorer outcome at earlier gestation at delivery, this hypothesis needs to be tested in a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Copyright 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14770389     DOI: 10.1002/uog.965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  20 in total

1.  Intermediate Diastolic Velocity as a Parameter of Cardiac Dysfunction in Growth-Restricted Fetuses.

Authors:  Xiangna Tang; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Hyunyoung Ahn; Maynor Garcia; Homam Saker; Steven J Korzeniewski; Adi L Tarca; Lami Yeo; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.587

Review 2.  Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Tamara Stampalija; Gillian M L Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-11-12

Review 3.  Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Tamara Stampalija; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-13

4.  Doppler velocimetry of ductus venous in preterm fetuses with brain sparing effect: neonatal outcome.

Authors:  Ynesmara Coelho Cosmo; Edward Araujo Júnior; Renato Augusto Moreira de Sá; Paulo Roberto Nassar de Carvalho; Rosiane Mattar; Laudelino Marques Lopes; Luciano Marcondes Machado Nardozza; Eduardo de Souza; Antonio Fernandes Moron
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2012-07

5.  Doppler assessment of fetal aortic isthmus flow in twin.

Authors:  Suk Young Kim; Soon Pyo Lee; Chae Min Lee; Sun Young Jung; Han Na Park
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2015-01-16

6.  Delivery of the growth restricted preterm fetus.

Authors:  Neeta L Vora; Nancy Chescheir
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  Nir Melamed; Ahmet Baschat; Yoav Yinon; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Federico Mecacci; Francesc Figueras; Vincenzo Berghella; Amala Nazareth; Muna Tahlak; H David McIntyre; Fabrício Da Silva Costa; Anne B Kihara; Eran Hadar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Mark Hanson; Ronald C Ma; Rachel Gooden; Eyal Sheiner; Anil Kapur; Hema Divakar; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Liran Hiersch; Liona C Poon; John Kingdom; Roberto Romero; Moshe Hod
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.561

8.  The relationship of newborn adiposity to fetal growth outcome based on birth weight or the modified neonatal growth assessment score.

Authors:  Wesley Lee; Thomas Riggs; Winston Koo; Russell L Deter; Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2012-05-29

Review 9.  Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Tamara Stampalija; Gillian Ml Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

10.  Fetal growth parameters and birth weight: their relationship to neonatal body composition.

Authors:  W Lee; M Balasubramaniam; R L Deter; S S Hassan; F Gotsch; J P Kusanovic; L F Gonçalves; R Romero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.299

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.