Literature DB >> 19640967

Newborn adiposity measured by plethysmography is not predicted by late gestation two-dimensional ultrasound measures of fetal growth.

Laurie J Moyer-Mileur1, Hillarie Slater, J Anne Thomson, Nicole Mihalopoulos, Jan Byrne, Michael W Varner.   

Abstract

Noninvasive measures of fetal and neonatal body composition may provide early identification of children at risk for obesity. Air displacement plethysmography provides a safe, precise measure of adiposity and has recently been validated in infants. Therefore, we explored relationships between term newborn percent body fat (%BF) measured by air displacement plethysmography to 2-dimensional ultrasound (2-D US) biometric measures of fetal growth and maternal and umbilical cord endocrine activity. A total of 47 mother/infant pairs were studied. Fetal biometrics by 2-D US and maternal blood samples were collected during late gestation (35 wk postmenstrual age); infants were measured within 72 h of birth. Fetal biometrics included biparietal diameter, femur length, head circumference, abdominal circumference (AC), and estimated fetal weight (EFW). Serum insulin, insulin-like growth factor (IGF) 1, IGF binding protein-3, and leptin concentrations were measured in umbilical cord and maternal serum. The mean %BF determined by plethysmography was 10.9 +/- 4.8%. EFW and fetal AC had the largest correlations with newborn %BF (R(2) = 0.14 and 0.10, respectively; P < 0.05); however, stepwise linear regression modeling did not identify any fetal biometric parameters as a significant predictor of newborn %BF. Newborn mid-thigh circumference (MTC; cm) and ponderal index (PI; weight, kg/length, cm(3)) explained 21.8 and 14.4% of the variability in %BF, respectively, and gave the best stepwise linear regression model (%BF = 0.446 MTC + 0.347 PI -29.692; P < 0.001). We conclude that fetal growth biometrics determined by 2-D US do not provide a reliable assessment of %BF in term infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19640967      PMCID: PMC3151022          DOI: 10.3945/jn.109.109058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  30 in total

1.  Intrauterine growth restriction and fetal body composition.

Authors:  G Larciprete; H Valensise; G Di Pierro; B Vasapollo; B Casalino; D Arduini; S Jarvis; E Cirese
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 2.  A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight.

Authors:  N J Dudley
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Body-composition assessment in infancy: air-displacement plethysmography compared with a reference 4-compartment model.

Authors:  Kenneth J Ellis; Manjiang Yao; Roman J Shypailo; Alessandro Urlando; William W Wong; William C Heird
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: comparison of bias, precision and consistency using 12 different formulae.

Authors:  N G Anderson; I J Jolley; J E Wells
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Identification of newborns with Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR) in weight and/or length based on constitutional growth potential.

Authors:  Nicole Mamelle; Magali Boniol; Olivier Rivière; Marie O Joly; Georges Mellier; Bernard Maria; Bernard Rousset; Olivier Claris
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Use of serial ultrasound to identify periods of fetal growth restriction in relation to neonatal anthropometry.

Authors:  Anusha H Hemachandra; Mark A Klebanoff
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.937

7.  Maternal body composition in relation to infant birth weight and subcutaneous adipose tissue.

Authors:  Elisabet Forsum; Marie Löf; Hanna Olausson; Elisabeth Olhager
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 8.  Size at birth, postnatal growth and risk of obesity.

Authors:  K K Ong
Journal:  Horm Res       Date:  2006-04-10

9.  Impact of fetal growth restriction on body composition and hormonal status at birth in infants of small and appropriate weight for gestational age.

Authors:  R Verkauskiene; J Beltrand; O Claris; D Chevenne; S Deghmoun; S Dorgeret; M Alison; P Gaucherand; O Sibony; C Lévy-Marchal
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.664

10.  Impact of maternal body mass index on neonate birthweight and body composition.

Authors:  Holly R Hull; Mary K Dinger; Allen W Knehans; David M Thompson; David A Fields
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  14 in total

1.  Fetal growth pathology score: a novel ultrasound parameter for individualized assessment of third trimester growth abnormalities.

Authors:  Russell L Deter; Wesley Lee; John C P Kingdom; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-03-20

2.  Prospective validation of fetal weight estimation using fractional limb volume.

Authors:  W Lee; R Deter; H Sangi-Haghpeykar; L Yeo; R Romero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Association of ultrasound-based measures of fetal body composition with newborn adiposity.

Authors:  S Ikenoue; F Waffarn; K Sumiyoshi; M Ohashi; C Ikenoue; C Buss; D L Gillen; H N Simhan; S Entringer; P D Wadhwa
Journal:  Pediatr Obes       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Genetic risk score for prediction of newborn adiposity and large-for-gestational-age birth.

Authors:  Reeti Chawla; Sylvia E Badon; Janani Rangarajan; Anna C Reisetter; Loren L Armstrong; Lynn P Lowe; Margrit Urbanek; Boyd E Metzger; M Geoffrey Hayes; Denise M Scholtens; William L Lowe
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  The relationship of newborn adiposity to fetal growth outcome based on birth weight or the modified neonatal growth assessment score.

Authors:  Wesley Lee; Thomas Riggs; Winston Koo; Russell L Deter; Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2012-05-29

Review 6.  Body composition during fetal development and infancy through the age of 5 years.

Authors:  T Toro-Ramos; C Paley; F X Pi-Sunyer; D Gallagher
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice for women who are overweight or obese and the effect on fetal growth and adiposity: the LIMIT randomised trial.

Authors:  R M Grivell; L N Yelland; A Deussen; C A Crowther; J M Dodd
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  A new formula for estimating fetal weight: The impression of biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness and femoral length on birth weight.

Authors:  Mojgan Kalantari; Arezou Negahdari; Shima Roknsharifi; Mostafa Qorbani
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2013-11

9.  Serum activin A and follistatin levels in gestational diabetes and the association of the Activin A-Follistatin system with anthropometric parameters in offspring.

Authors:  Silvia Näf; Xavier Escote; Mónica Ballesteros; Rosa Elena Yañez; Inmaculada Simón-Muela; Pilar Gil; Gerard Albaiges; Joan Vendrell; Ana Megia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Infants born large-for-gestational-age display slower growth in early infancy, but no epigenetic changes at birth.

Authors:  Valentina Chiavaroli; Wayne S Cutfield; José G B Derraik; Zengxiang Pan; Sherry Ngo; Allan Sheppard; Susan Craigie; Peter Stone; Lynn Sadler; Fredrik Ahlsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.