Literature DB >> 19251212

A mechanism for the upper limit of vulnerability.

Nachaat Mazeh1, Bradley J Roth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The strongest shock that induces reentry in the heart is the upper limit of vulnerability (ULV). In order to understand defibrillation, one must know what causes the ULV.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to examine the mechanism of the upper limit of vulnerability.
METHODS: Numerical simulations of cardiac tissue were performed using the bidomain model. An S2 shock was applied during the refractory period of the S1 action potential, and results using a smooth curving fiber geometry were compared with results using a smooth plus random fiber geometry.
RESULTS: When using a smooth fiber geometry only, no ULV was observed. However, when a random fiber geometry was included, the ULV was present. The difference arises from the fate of the shock-induced break wave front when it reaches the edge of the tissue hyperpolarized by the shock (the virtual anode).
CONCLUSION: Our numerical simulations suggest that local heterogeneities throughout the tissue may be crucial for determining the fate of the shock-induced wave front at the edge of the virtual anode, and therefore play an important role in the mechanism underlying the ULV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19251212      PMCID: PMC2672308          DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  29 in total

1.  Reversal of repolarization gradient does not reverse the chirality of shock-induced reentry in the rabbit heart.

Authors:  Y Cheng; V Nikolski; I R Efimov
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-09

2.  Virtual electrode polarization in the far field: implications for external defibrillation.

Authors:  I R Efimov; F Aguel; Y Cheng; B Wollenzier; N Trayanova
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Effect of field stimulation on cellular repolarization in rabbit myocardium. Implications for reentry induction.

Authors:  S B Knisley; W M Smith; R E Ideker
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 17.367

4.  How the spatial frequency of polarization influences the induction of reentry in cardiac tissue.

Authors:  Deborah Langrill Beaudoin; Bradley J Roth
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-07

5.  A model of the ventricular cardiac action potential. Depolarization, repolarization, and their interaction.

Authors:  C H Luo; Y Rudy
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 17.367

6.  Transmembrane voltage changes produced by real and virtual electrodes during monophasic defibrillation shock delivered by an implantable electrode.

Authors:  I R Efimov; Y N Cheng; M Biermann; D R Van Wagoner; T N Mazgalev; P J Tchou
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-09

7.  Effect of microscopic and macroscopic discontinuities on the response of cardiac tissue to defibrillating (stimulating) currents.

Authors:  R Plonsey; R C Barr
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  [The threshold of synchronous response of the myocardial fibers. Application to the experimental comparison of the efficacy of different forms of electroshock defibrillation].

Authors:  A Fabiato; P Coumel; R Gourgon; R Saumont
Journal:  Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss       Date:  1967-04

9.  Virtual electrodes in cardiac tissue: a common mechanism for anodal and cathodal stimulation.

Authors:  J P Wikswo; S F Lin; R A Abbas
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Influence of shock strength and timing on induction of ventricular arrhythmias in dogs.

Authors:  N Shibata; P S Chen; E G Dixon; P D Wolf; N D Danieley; W M Smith; R E Ideker
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1988-10
View more
  6 in total

1.  Diastolic field stimulation: the role of shock duration in epicardial activation and propagation.

Authors:  Marcella C Woods; Ilija Uzelac; Mark R Holcomb; John P Wikswo; Veniamin Y Sidorov
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  A Simplified Approach for Simultaneous Measurements of Wavefront Velocity and Curvature in the Heart Using Activation Times.

Authors:  Nachaat Mazeh; David E Haines; Matthew W Kay; Bradley J Roth
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.495

3.  Upper limit of vulnerability and heterogeneity.

Authors:  Peng-Sheng Chen; Shien-Fong Lin
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 6.343

4.  Investigating the role of the coronary vasculature in the mechanisms of defibrillation.

Authors:  Martin J Bishop; Gernot Plank; Edward Vigmond
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-12-08

5.  How hyperpolarization and the recovery of excitability affect propagation through a virtual anode in the heart.

Authors:  Nicholas P Charteris; Bradley J Roth
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.238

6.  High defibrillation threshold: the science, signs and solutions.

Authors:  Sony Jacob; Victorio Pidlaoan; Jaspreet Singh; Aditya Bharadwaj; Mehul B Patel; Antonio Carrillo
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-01-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.