Literature DB >> 9300301

Transmembrane voltage changes produced by real and virtual electrodes during monophasic defibrillation shock delivered by an implantable electrode.

I R Efimov1, Y N Cheng, M Biermann, D R Van Wagoner, T N Mazgalev, P J Tchou.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Epicardial point stimulation produces nonuniform changes in the transmembrane voltage of surrounding cells with simultaneous occurrence of areas of transient positive and negative polarization. This is the phenomenon of virtual electrode. We sought to characterize the responses of epicardial ventricular tissue to the application of monophasic electric shocks from an internal transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) lead. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts (n = 12) were stained with di-4-ANEPPS. A 9-mm-long distal electrode was placed in the right ventricle. A 6-cm proximal electrode was positioned horizontally 3 cm posteriorly and 1 cm superiorly with respect to the heart. Monophasic anodal and cathodal pulses were produced by discharging a 150-microF capacitor. Shocks were applied either during the plateau phase of an action potential (AP) or during ventricular fibrillation. Leading-edge voltage of the pulse was 50 to 150 V, and the pulse duration was 10 msec. Transmembrane voltage was optically recorded during application of the shock, simultaneously from 256 sites on a 11 x 11 mm area of the anterior right ventricular epicardium directly transmural to the distal electrode. The shock effect was evaluated by determining the difference between the AP affected by the shock and the normal AP. During cathodal stimulation an area of depolarization near the electrode was observed, surrounded by areas of hyperpolarization. The amplitude of polarization gradually decreased in areas far from the electrode. Inverting shock polarity reversed this effect.
CONCLUSION: ICD monophasic defibrillation shocks create large dynamically interacting areas of both negative and positive polarization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9300301     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1997.tb00627.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  22 in total

1.  Roles of electric field and fiber structure in cardiac electric stimulation.

Authors:  S B Knisley; N Trayanova; F Aguel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Entrainment by an extracellular AC stimulus in a computational model of cardiac tissue.

Authors:  J M Meunier; N A Trayanova; R A Gray
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-10

Review 3.  Mechanisms of defibrillation.

Authors:  Derek J Dosdall; Vladimir G Fast; Raymond E Ideker
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 9.590

Review 4.  Modeling defibrillation of the heart: approaches and insights.

Authors:  Natalia Trayanova; Jason Constantino; Takashi Ashihara; Gernot Plank
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2011

5.  The role of mechanoelectric feedback in vulnerability to electric shock.

Authors:  Weihui Li; Viatcheslav Gurev; Andrew D McCulloch; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 3.667

6.  Atria are more susceptible to electroporation than ventricles: implications for atrial stunning, shock-induced arrhythmia and defibrillation failure.

Authors:  Vadim V Fedorov; Geran Kostecki; Matt Hemphill; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  Multiple monophasic shocks improve electrotherapy of ventricular tachycardia in a rabbit model of chronic infarction.

Authors:  Wenwen Li; Crystal M Ripplinger; Qing Lou; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 6.343

8.  Chronaxie of defibrillation: a pathway toward further optimization of defibrillation waveform?

Authors:  Igor R Efimov
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-10-14

9.  Panoramic imaging reveals basic mechanisms of induction and termination of ventricular tachycardia in rabbit heart with chronic infarction: implications for low-voltage cardioversion.

Authors:  Crystal M Ripplinger; Qing Lou; Wenwen Li; Jennifer Hadley; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 6.343

10.  High defibrillation threshold: the science, signs and solutions.

Authors:  Sony Jacob; Victorio Pidlaoan; Jaspreet Singh; Aditya Bharadwaj; Mehul B Patel; Antonio Carrillo
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-01-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.