Literature DB >> 1551197

Effect of field stimulation on cellular repolarization in rabbit myocardium. Implications for reentry induction.

S B Knisley1, W M Smith, R E Ideker.   

Abstract

We have investigated the effects of electric field stimulation on membrane repolarization in rabbit papillary muscles and assessed the consequences of these effects for the dispersion of intracellular potentials and the production of a propagation wave front or unidirectional block in relatively refractory tissue. The stimuli studied had electric field strength of 0.25-14 V/cm, duration of 2 msec, and field orientation along or across the myocardial fibers. The field strengths to excite the muscles in diastole were 0.68 or 1.23 V/cm for stimuli oriented along or across the fibers, respectively (p less than 0.01, along versus across). A 2.5-V/cm stimulus given near the end of the action potential (AP) produced either no response or, after increasing the stimulus delay only 2-3 msec, a full response with almost no AP durations that were intermediate. For stimulation along and across the fibers, respectively, given at 70% of the AP duration, a 4-V/cm stimulus produced AP prolongation (measured at 90% repolarization) of 20% and 4% (p less than 0.05), an 8-V/cm stimulus produced AP prolongation of 36% and 20% (p less than 0.05), and a 14-V/cm stimulus produced AP prolongation of 36% and 30% (p = NS). For either orientation, AP prolongation by stimuli of 8 V/cm or 14 V/cm increased gradually as the stimulus delay was increased. The different effects in relatively refractory tissue of stimuli of 2.5 V/cm compared with 8 V/cm can explain the propagation wave front and block that occur with electrically induced functional reentry in the heart.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1551197     DOI: 10.1161/01.res.70.4.707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Res        ISSN: 0009-7330            Impact factor:   17.367


  12 in total

1.  Optical transmembrane potential recordings during intracardiac defibrillation-strength shocks.

Authors:  D M Clark; A E Pollard; R E Ideker; S B Knisley
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Roles of electric field and fiber structure in cardiac electric stimulation.

Authors:  S B Knisley; N Trayanova; F Aguel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Mechanisms of defibrillation.

Authors:  Derek J Dosdall; Vladimir G Fast; Raymond E Ideker
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 9.590

4.  Cathodal stimulation in the recovery phase of a propagating planar wave in the rabbit heart reveals four stimulation mechanisms.

Authors:  Veniamin Y Sidorov; Marcella C Woods; Franz Baudenbacher
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Spatial distribution of cardiac transmembrane potentials around an extracellular electrode: dependence on fiber orientation.

Authors:  M Neunlist; L Tung
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Deexcitation of cardiac cells.

Authors:  A Pumir; G Romey; V Krinsky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Mechanisms of cardiac cell excitation with premature monophasic and biphasic field stimuli: a model study.

Authors:  M G Fishler; E A Sobie; N V Thakor; L Tung
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Electrical stimulation of cardiac myocytes.

Authors:  R Ranjan; N V Thakor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Virtual electrode effects in myocardial fibers.

Authors:  S B Knisley; B C Hill; R E Ideker
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  [Mechanisms of electrical defibrillation].

Authors:  S Reek; R E Ideker
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.