Literature DB >> 19250935

Retinal pathway origins of the pattern ERG of the mouse.

Gen Miura1, Minhua H Wang, Kevin M Ivers, Laura J Frishman.   

Abstract

This study investigated contributions from the retinal On and Off pathways, and the spiking and nonspiking activity of neurons in those pathways to the pattern ERG of the mouse. Light-adapted pattern and ganzfeld ERGs were recorded from anesthetized C57BL/6 mice 3-4 months of age. Recordings were made before and after intravitreal injections of PDA (cis-2,3-piperidine-dicarboxylic acid) to block transmission to hyperpolarizing 2nd order and all 3rd order neurons, TTX (tetrodotoxin) to block Na(+)-dependent spiking, APB (2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid) to block synapses between photoreceptors and ON-bipolar cells, and APB + TTX and PDA + TTX cocktails. The pattern stimuli consisted of 0.05 cy/deg gratings reversing in contrast at 1 Hz, presented at various contrasts (50-90%) and a rod saturating mean luminance. For flash ERGs, brief green ganzfeld flashes were presented on a rod-suppressing green background. Recordings were made 39-42 days after unilateral optic nerve crush (ONC) in a subset of animals in which ganglion cell degeneration was subsequently confirmed in retinal sections. Pattern ERGs were similar in waveform for all contrasts, with a positive wave (P1) peak for 90% contrast around 60 ms on average and maximum trough for a negative wave (N2) around 132 ms after each contrast reversal; amplitudes were greatest for 90% contrast which became the standard stimulus. ONC eliminated or nearly eliminated the pattern ERG but did not affect the major waves of the flash ERG. PDA and TTX both delayed P1 and N2 waves of the pattern ERG, and reduced their amplitudes, with effects of PDA on N2 greater than those of TTX. In the flash ERG, PDA reduced a-wave amplitudes, removed OPs but hardly affected b-wave amplitudes. In contrast, TTX reduced b-wave amplitudes substantially, as previously observed in rat. APB removed P1 of the pattern ERG, but left a negative wave of similar timing and amplitude to N2. In the flash ERG, APB removed the b-wave, producing a negative ERG. Addition of TTX to the APB injection removed most of N2 of the pattern ERG, while other waves of the pattern and flash ERG resembled those after APB alone. Addition of TTX to the PDA injection had little effect on the pattern ERG beyond that of PDA alone, but it prolonged the b-wave of the flash ERG. In conclusion, this study confirmed that a selective lesion of ganglion cells will practically eliminate the pattern ERG. The study also showed that P1 of the mouse pattern ERG is dominated by contributions, mainly spiking, from ON pathway neurons, whereas N2 reflects substantial spiking activity from the OFF pathway as well as nonspiking contributions from both pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19250935      PMCID: PMC2739005          DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2009.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  67 in total

1.  Displaced amacrine cells of the mouse retina.

Authors:  Luis Pérez De Sevilla Müller; Jennifer Shelley; Reto Weiler
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Retinal receptors in rodents maximally sensitive to ultraviolet light.

Authors:  G H Jacobs; J Neitz; J F Deegan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-10-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Electrical Responses of the Human Eye to Moving Stimulus Patterns.

Authors:  L A Riggs; E P Johnson; A M Schick
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; J W Walters
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Pattern ERG in the monkey after section of the optic nerve.

Authors:  L Maffei; A Fiorentini; S Bisti; H Holländer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Pharmacological analysis of the rat cone electroretinogram.

Authors:  Li Xu; Sherry L Ball; Kenneth R Alexander; Neal S Peachey
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.241

Review 7.  Update on the pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma.

Authors:  Michael Bach; Michael B Hoffmann
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Improved electrode for electroretinography.

Authors:  W W Dawson; G L Trick; C A Litzkow
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  A 3-year follow-up study of ocular hypertension by pattern electroretinogram.

Authors:  M Arai; N Yoshimura; H Sakaue; E Chihara; Y Honda
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.250

10.  Retinal ganglion cell degeneration is topological but not cell type specific in DBA/2J mice.

Authors:  Tatjana C Jakobs; Richard T Libby; Yixin Ben; Simon W M John; Richard H Masland
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  42 in total

1.  Retinal pathway origins of the pattern electroretinogram (PERG).

Authors:  Xunda Luo; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Electoretinographic evidence of retinal ganglion cell-dependent function in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Pantea Moghimi; Nathalia Torres Jimenez; Linda K McLoon; Theoden I Netoff; Michael S Lee; Angus MacDonald; Robert F Miller
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Contribution of retinal ganglion cells to the mouse electroretinogram.

Authors:  Benjamin J Smith; Xu Wang; Balwantray C Chauhan; Patrice D Côté; François Tremblay
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 4.  Electrophysiological assessment of retinal ganglion cell function.

Authors:  Vittorio Porciatti
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  The pattern ERG in chicks - Stimulus dependence and optic nerve section.

Authors:  Lisa A Ostrin; Vivian Choh; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Evaluating retinal ganglion cell loss and dysfunction.

Authors:  Ben Mead; Stanislav Tomarev
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.467

7.  A new mouse model of inducible, chronic retinal ganglion cell dysfunction not associated with cell death.

Authors:  Xu Yang; Tsung-Han Chou; Marco Ruggeri; Vittorio Porciatti
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Migraine photophobia originating in cone-driven retinal pathways.

Authors:  Rodrigo Noseda; Carolyn A Bernstein; Rony-Reuven Nir; Alice J Lee; Anne B Fulton; Suzanne M Bertisch; Alexandra Hovaguimian; Dean M Cestari; Rodrigo Saavedra-Walker; David Borsook; Bruce L Doran; Catherine Buettner; Rami Burstein
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Integrative properties of retinal ganglion cell electrical responsiveness depend on neurotrophic support and genotype in the mouse.

Authors:  Tsung-Han Chou; William J Feuer; Odelia Schwartz; Mario J Rojas; Jennifer K Roebber; Vittorio Porciatti
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.467

10.  The bioelectric field of the pattern electroretinogram in the mouse.

Authors:  Tsung-Han Chou; Vittorio Porciatti
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.