Literature DB >> 27668989

The pattern ERG in chicks - Stimulus dependence and optic nerve section.

Lisa A Ostrin1, Vivian Choh2, Christine F Wildsoet3.   

Abstract

The chick is widely used in studies of eye growth regulation and myopia. The aim of this study was to explore the utility of pattern (p)ERG as a tool to assess retinal function in such studies. Effects of optical defocus and diffusing blur, manipulations used to alter eye growth experimentally, were evaluated. PERGs were recorded from White-Leghorn chickens, using a checkerboard pattern, including 8 spatial frequencies (0.05-2.2c/d SF), 13 contrast levels (1-100%), and 8 temporal reversal frequencies (0.5-20Hz). The acute effects of defocus and diffusing blur were examined. Flash- and pERGs were also recorded from chicks that underwent monocular optic nerve section (ONS), to explore the contribution of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). Measurements were made up to 6weeks post-ONS, complemented with SD-OCT imaging. In normal chicks, the response to 1Hz, 100% contrast stimuli showed positive- and negative-going waveforms at 43ms (P1) and 75ms (N95), respectively, with 0.06-0.1c/d SF eliciting the largest P1 amplitudes of 21.9±2.5μV. Contrast levels above 5% yielded measurable P1 responses. Responses were transient and monophasic for 0.5-5Hzreversal rates, with higher temporal frequencies yielding steady state responses. Defocus and diffusing blur decreased pERG amplitude across all SFs. pERG responses remained normal after ONS, despite the loss of RGCs. In conclusion, chicks show robust pERG responses, which are attenuated by defocus and diffusing blur. The pERG response is not affected by ONS, suggesting that RGCs do not contribute to the chick pERG.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chicken; Defocus; Diffusing blur; Electroretinogram; Myopia; Optic nerve section; Pattern ERG

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27668989      PMCID: PMC5092231          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  35 in total

1.  Electrical Responses of the Human Eye to Moving Stimulus Patterns.

Authors:  L A Riggs; E P Johnson; A M Schick
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Diurnal control of rod function in the chicken.

Authors:  F Schaeffel; B Rohrer; T Lemmer; E Zrenner
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Response linearity and kinetics of the cat retina: the bipolar cell component of the dark-adapted electroretinogram.

Authors:  J G Robson; L J Frishman
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.241

4.  Visual deprivation causes myopia in chicks with optic nerve section.

Authors:  D Troilo; M D Gottlieb; J Wallman
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.424

5.  Pattern electroretinogram and optic nerve section in pigeons.

Authors:  P Blondeau; J Lamarche; G Lafond; J R Brunette
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.424

6.  Signal transmission along retinal rods and the origin of the electroretinographic a-wave.

Authors:  R D Penn; W A Hagins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-07-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Pigeon pattern electroretinogram: a response unaffected by chronic section of the optic nerve.

Authors:  P Bagnoli; V Porciatti; W Francesconi; R Barsellotti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Pattern ERG in the monkey after section of the optic nerve.

Authors:  L Maffei; A Fiorentini; S Bisti; H Holländer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The pigeon pattern electroretinogram is not affected by massive loss of cell bodies in the ganglion layer induced by chronic section of the optic nerve.

Authors:  V Porciatti; W Francesconi; P Bagnoli
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-10-30       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings in the cat.

Authors:  L Maffei; A Fiorentini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The chick eye in vision research: An excellent model for the study of ocular disease.

Authors:  C Ellis Wisely; Javed A Sayed; Heather Tamez; Chris Zelinka; Mohamed H Abdel-Rahman; Andy J Fischer; Colleen M Cebulla
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  Efficacy of N95 amplitude of pattern electroretinogram measured from baseline to N95 trough in the traumatic optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Kun Hae Kim; Ungsoo Samuel Kim
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  IMI - Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia.

Authors:  David Troilo; Earl L Smith; Debora L Nickla; Regan Ashby; Andrei V Tkatchenko; Lisa A Ostrin; Timothy J Gawne; Machelle T Pardue; Jody A Summers; Chea-Su Kee; Falk Schroedl; Siegfried Wahl; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Retinal ganglion cell ablation in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Ashutosh Jnawali; Xiao Lin; Nimesh B Patel; Laura J Frishman; Lisa A Ostrin
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 5.  Retinal Ganglion Cells-Diversity of Cell Types and Clinical Relevance.

Authors:  Ungsoo Samuel Kim; Omar A Mahroo; John D Mollon; Patrick Yu-Wai-Man
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Retinal Responses to Simulated Optical Blur Using a Novel Dead Leaves ERG Stimulus.

Authors:  Athanasios Panorgias; Stephanie Aigbe; Emily Jeong; Carles Otero; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.799

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.