Literature DB >> 19250022

Fate of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a critical analysis.

Arvind Ganpule1, Mahesh Desai.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the fate of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and identify the factors that predict spontaneous passage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 2469 patients who underwent PCNL at our center between January 2000 to January 2008.
RESULTS: Residual fragments (RF) were identified in 187 (7.57%) patients. The most common site of RF was lower calix (57.7%), and the mean size of RF was 38.6 +/- 52 mm(2). Eighty-four stones passed spontaneously at a mean follow-up of 24 months (range 1-100 mos). Of the stones that passed spontaneously, 65.47% did so in 3 months. RF <25 mm(2) and those situated in the renal pelvis had the best chance of clearance. Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that a history of intervention (P < 0.006), metabolic abnormalities such as hypercalcuria (P < 0.001) and hyperuraecemia (P < 0.03), preoperative nephrostomy drainage (P < 0.05), presence of a Double-J stent, (P < 0.001), time of presentation of residue (P < 0.08), size of residue (P < 0.007), and surgeon experience (P < 0.001) were significant factors in predicting the fate of RF after PCNL.
CONCLUSIONS: The most common site of post-PCNL RF was the lower calix. Renal pelvic RF <25 mm(2) have the best chance of spontaneous passage. Approximately half the RF will pass spontaneously, and the majority will clear in 3 months. The size of the residual stone, history of intervention, renal failure, and metabolic hyperactivity are predictors of persistence of RF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19250022     DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.0217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  15 in total

1.  Medium-term follow-up of clinically insignificant residual fragments after minimal invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prognostic features and risk factors.

Authors:  Xin Li; Long He; Jianzhong Li; Zhongyang Duan; Zijian Gao; Long Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

Review 2.  Physical therapy in the management of stone fragments: progress, status, and needs.

Authors:  Suoshi Jing; Qiongyan Gai; Xin Zhao; Juan Wang; Yuwen Gong; Yangyang Pang; Chen Peng; Yuejun Tian; Yuhan Wang; Zhiping Wang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Role of conservative management of stones.

Authors:  Kesavapillai Subramonian; Hector Sandoval Barba; Maitrey Darrad
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-11-01

Review 4.  When (and how) to surgically treat asymptomatic renal stones.

Authors:  Zachariah G Goldsmith; Michael E Lipkin
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Focused ultrasound to expel calculi from the kidney: safety and efficacy of a clinical prototype device.

Authors:  Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Bryan W Cunitz; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Frank Starr; Marla Paun; Barbrina Dunmire; H Denny Liggitt; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer; Ryan S Hsi; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Methylene Blue Injection as an Alternative to Antegrade Nephrostography to Assess Urinary Obstruction After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Matthew D Truesdale; Molly Elmer-Dewitt; Marco Sandri; Bogdana Schmidt; Ian Metzler; Adam Gadzinski; Marshall L Stoller; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 7.  Residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Kaan Ozdedeli; Mete Cek
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.021

Review 8.  Clinical significance of residual fragments in 2015: impact, detection, and how to avoid them.

Authors:  Simon Hein; Arkadiusz Miernik; Konrad Wilhelm; Fabian Adams; Daniel Schlager; Thomas R W Herrmann; Jens J Rassweiler; Martin Schoenthaler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Impact of Residual Fragments following Endourological Treatments in Renal Stones.

Authors:  Cenk Acar; Cag Cal
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-07-05

10.  Shock Wave Lithotripsy is More Effective for Residual Fragments after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy than for Primary Stones of the Same Size: A Matched Pair Cohort Study.

Authors:  Alireza Aminsharifi; Dariush Irani; Hossein Amirzargar
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2018-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.