Literature DB >> 26885122

Medium-term follow-up of clinically insignificant residual fragments after minimal invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prognostic features and risk factors.

Xin Li1, Long He1, Jianzhong Li1, Zhongyang Duan1, Zijian Gao1, Long Liu1.   

Abstract

Minimal invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) has been commonly used in removing urinary stones. However, the detrimental effects of clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) after MPCNL have not been entirely clarified. This study is aimed at investigating the clinical outcomes of CIRF after MPCNL. From July 2004 to June 2010, 1862 cases of urolithiasis underwent MPCNL. 185 cases of CIRF were subsequently diagnosed using CT scanning and followed up. During follow-ups, medical history, physical examination, routine blood and urine tests, subjective symptoms were recorded. A multiple-variable Cox regression was performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of different factors for CIRF after MPCNL. Of 185 cases of CIRF followed up for 31.4 months on average, 58 cases (31.4%) suffered symptomatic episodes, including 30 cases of hematuresis, 21 cases of low urinary tract symptoms and 7 cases of hematuresis complicated with renal colic. The results of Cox regression showed that past history of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), CIRF size, hypercalcuria and CIRF located in ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) are independent risk factors for medium-term symptomatic episodes of CIRF after MPCNL. We suggest that regular follow-ups should be considered for patients with CIRFs after MPCNL for timely treatments, especially for those who are hypercalcuria-complicated, have history of ESWL, or suffer relatively large CIRFs located in the UPJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimal invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy; clinically insignificant residual fragments; prognostic features

Year:  2015        PMID: 26885122      PMCID: PMC4723967     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  25 in total

Review 1.  Management of residual stones.

Authors:  F C Delvecchio; G M Preminger
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.241

2.  Re: Osman et al.: clinically insignificant residual fragments: an acceptable term in the computed tomography era? (Urology 2013;81:723-726).

Authors:  Manish Garg; Vishwajeet Singh; Arvind Kumar
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Epidemiological studies on the prevalence of upper urinary calculi in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ying-Huei Lee; Wann-Chu Huang; Jeng-Yu Tsai; Chih-Ming Lu; Wei-Chuan Chen; Ming-Huei Lee; Huei-Shing Hsu; Jong-Khing Huang; Luke S Chang
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Fate of clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with EDAP LT-01 lithotripter.

Authors:  Y T Moon; S C Kim
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 5.  Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: an update.

Authors:  J J Rassweiler; C Renner; C Chaussy; S Thüroff
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Natural history of residual renal stone fragments after ESWL.

Authors:  C Candau; C Saussine; H Lang; C Roy; F Faure; D Jacqmin
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Kidney stones recurrence and regrowth after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Wilaiwan Chongruksut; Bannakij Lojanapiwat; Chamaiporn Tawichasri; Somboon Paichitvichean; Jantima Euathrongchit; Vorvat Choomsai Na Ayudhya; Jayanton Patumanond
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2011-09

8.  Effect of medical management and residual fragments on recurrent stone formation following shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J K Fine; C Y Pak; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Fate of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a critical analysis.

Authors:  Arvind Ganpule; Mahesh Desai
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children in different age groups: data from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study.

Authors:  Selcuk Guven; Antonio Frattini; Bulent Onal; Mahesh Desai; Emanuele Montanari; Jan Kums; Marco Garofalo; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.