Literature DB >> 11725570

Reliability of radiological parameters measured on anteroposterior pelvis radiographs of patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.

L Tan1, S Aktas, C Copuroglu, M Ozcan, M Ture.   

Abstract

In order to evaluate the reliability of radiological parameters, we retrospectively reviewed the anteroposterior pelvic x-rays of 30 hips in 15 patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip. The following parameters were studied: acetabular index, center-edge angle, c/b ratio, Sharp's angle and teardrop figure. Each of the two authors measured the parameters twice on two separate days. Statistical assessment of the interobserver and intraobserver reliability was performed. The measurements of acetabular index and c/b ratio were reliable according to both intra- and interobserver reliability analysis, whereas center-edge angle, teardrop figure and Sharp's angle evaluations were reliable in the intraobserver comparisons but not in the interobserver comparisons. In conclusion, both acetabular index and c/b ratio may be used safely in the evaluation of developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11725570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg        ISSN: 0001-6462            Impact factor:   0.500


  12 in total

1.  Reliability and agreement of measures used in radiographic evaluation of the adult hip.

Authors:  Nicholas H Mast; Franco Impellizzeri; Stephan Keller; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The gothic arch: a reliable measurement for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Paul K Herickhoff; Megan K O'Brien; Lori A Dolan; Jose A Morcuende; Jonathan B Peterson; Stuart L Weinstein
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

3.  Applicability of DICOM structured reporting for the standardized exchange of implantation plans.

Authors:  Thomas Treichel; Philipp Liebmann; Oliver Burgert; Michael Gessat
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Reliability and predictability of the centre-edge angle in the assessment of pincer femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Satish Kutty; Prism Schneider; Peter Faris; Gerhard Kiefer; Bevan Frizzell; Roy Park; James N Powell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Lateral center-edge angle on conventional radiography and computed tomography.

Authors:  Shafagh Monazzam; James D Bomar; Krishna Cidambi; Peter Kruk; Harish Hosalkar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Prevalence of developmental dysplasia of the hip in children with clubfoot.

Authors:  Daud Ts Chou; Manoj Ramachandran
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 1.548

7.  Preservation of the rectus femoris origin during periacetabular osteotomy does not compromise acetabular reorientation.

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Jill A Erickson; Mike B Anderson; Lucas A Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Influence of patient axial malpositioning on the trueness and precision of pelvic parameters obtained from 3D reconstructions based on biplanar radiographs.

Authors:  Bachir Ghostine; Christophe Sauret; Ayman Assi; Ziad Bakouny; Nour Khalil; Wafa Skalli; Ismat Ghanem
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Radiographic study of the acetabulum and proximal femur between 1 and 3 years of age.

Authors:  Pedro Gutiérrez Carbonell; D Bustamante Suárez de Puga; J Roca Vicente-Franqueira; A Lajarín Ortuño
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 1.246

10.  Multiplanar evaluation of radiological findings associated with acetabular dysplasia and investigation of its prevalence in an Asian population: a CT-based study.

Authors:  Tomohiro Mimura; Kanji Mori; Masahiro Kitagawa; Mariko Ueki; Yuki Furuya; Taku Kawasaki; Shinji Imai
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.