Literature DB >> 10204931

Ultrasound screening for hips at risk in developmental dysplasia. Is it worth it?

R W Paton1, M S Srinivasan, B Shah, S Hollis.   

Abstract

Between May 1992 and April 1997, there were 20,452 births in the Blackburn District. In the same period 1107 infants with hip 'at-risk' factors were screened prospectively by ultrasound. We recorded the presence of dislocation and dysplasia detected under the age of six months using Graf's alpha angle. Early dislocation was present in 36 hips (34 dislocatable and 2 irreducible). Of the 36 unstable hips, 30 (83%) were referred as being Ortolani-positive or unstable; 25 (69%) of these had at least one of the risk factors. Only 11 (31%) were identified from the 'at-risk' screening programme alone (0.54 per 1000 live births). Eight cases of 'late' dislocation presented after the age of six months (0.39 per 1000 live births). The overall rate of dislocation was 2.2 per 1000 live births. Only 31% of the dislocated hips belonged to a major 'at-risk' group. Statistical analysis confirmed that the risk factors had a relatively poor predictive value if used as a screening test for dislocation. In infants referred for doubtful clinical instability, one dislocation was detected for every 11 infants screened (95% confidence interval (CI) 8 to 17) whereas in infants referred because of the presence of any of the major 'at-risk' factors the rate was one in 75 (95% CI 42 to 149). Routine ultrasound screening of the 'at-risk' groups on their own is of little value in significantly reducing the rate of 'late' dislocation in DDH, but screening clinically unstable hips alone or associated with 'at-risk' factors has a high rate of detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10204931     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b2.8972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  12 in total

1.  Selective ultrasound screening for developmental hip dysplasia: effect on management and late detected cases. A prospective survey during 1991-2006.

Authors:  Lene Bjerke Laborie; Trond Jacob Markestad; Henrik Davidsen; Kari Røine Brurås; Stein Magnus Aukland; John Asle Bjørlykke; Hallvard Reigstad; Kari Indrekvam; Trude Gundersen Lehmann; Ingvild Øvstebø Engesæter; Lars Birger Engesæter; Karen Rosendahl
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-12-13

2.  Late presentation of developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  R Gul; J C Coffey; G Khayyat; A J McGuinness
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2002 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 3.  Screening and treatment in developmental dysplasia of the hip-where do we go from here?

Authors:  Mathew D Sewell; Deborah M Eastwood
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Do we need to follow up an early normal ultrasound with a later plain radiograph in children with a family history of developmental dysplasia of the hip?

Authors:  Suhayl Tafazal; Mark J Flowers
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-07-15

5.  Clinical examination versus ultrasonography in detecting developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  H Dogruel; H Atalar; O Y Yavuz; U Sayli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Screening of Newborns and Infants for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ritesh Arvind Pandey; Ashok N Johari
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  Evaluation of primary care 6- to 8-week hip check for diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a 15-year observational cohort study.

Authors:  Ronnie Davies; Christopher Talbot; Robin Paton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  To screen or not to screen? A decision analysis of the utility of screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Susan T Mahan; Jeffrey N Katz; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Radiographic study of the acetabulum and proximal femur between 1 and 3 years of age.

Authors:  Pedro Gutiérrez Carbonell; D Bustamante Suárez de Puga; J Roca Vicente-Franqueira; A Lajarín Ortuño
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 1.246

10.  Selective ultrasound screening is inadequate to identify patients who present with symptomatic adult acetabular dysplasia.

Authors:  Ernest L Sink; Benjamin F Ricciardi; Katrina Dela Torre; Charles T Price
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 1.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.