BACKGROUND: Studies in many countries have reported higher lung cancer incidence and mortality in individuals with lower socioeconomic status. METHODS: To investigate the role of smoking in these inequalities, we used data from 391,251 participants in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study, a cohort of individuals in 10 European countries. We collected information on smoking (history and quantity), fruit and vegetable consumption, and education through questionnaires at study entry and gathered data on lung cancer incidence for a mean of 8.4 years. Socioeconomic status was defined as the highest attained level of education, and participants were grouped by sex and region of residence (Northern Europe, Germany, or Southern Europe). Relative indices of inequality (RIIs) of lung cancer risk unadjusted and adjusted for smoking were estimated using Cox regression models. Additional analyses were performed by histological type. RESULTS: During the study period, 939 men and 692 women developed lung cancer. Inequalities in lung cancer risk (RII(men) = 3.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.77 to 4.73, 117 vs 52 per 100,000 person-years for lowest vs highest education level; RII(women) = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.77 to 3.21, 46 vs 25 per 100,000 person-years) decreased after adjustment for smoking but remained statistically significant (RII(men) = 2.29, 95% CI = 1.75 to 3.01; RII(women) = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.18 to 2.13). Large RIIs were observed among men and women in Northern European countries and among men in Germany, but inequalities in lung cancer risk were reverse (RIIs < 1) among women in Southern European countries. Inequalities differed by histological type. Adjustment for smoking reduced inequalities similarly for all histological types and among men and women in all regions. In all analysis, further adjustment for fruit and vegetable consumption did not change the estimates. CONCLUSION: Self-reported smoking consistently explains approximately 50% of the inequalities in lung cancer risk due to differences in education.
BACKGROUND: Studies in many countries have reported higher lung cancer incidence and mortality in individuals with lower socioeconomic status. METHODS: To investigate the role of smoking in these inequalities, we used data from 391,251 participants in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study, a cohort of individuals in 10 European countries. We collected information on smoking (history and quantity), fruit and vegetable consumption, and education through questionnaires at study entry and gathered data on lung cancer incidence for a mean of 8.4 years. Socioeconomic status was defined as the highest attained level of education, and participants were grouped by sex and region of residence (Northern Europe, Germany, or Southern Europe). Relative indices of inequality (RIIs) of lung cancer risk unadjusted and adjusted for smoking were estimated using Cox regression models. Additional analyses were performed by histological type. RESULTS: During the study period, 939 men and 692 women developed lung cancer. Inequalities in lung cancer risk (RII(men) = 3.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.77 to 4.73, 117 vs 52 per 100,000 person-years for lowest vs highest education level; RII(women) = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.77 to 3.21, 46 vs 25 per 100,000 person-years) decreased after adjustment for smoking but remained statistically significant (RII(men) = 2.29, 95% CI = 1.75 to 3.01; RII(women) = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.18 to 2.13). Large RIIs were observed among men and women in Northern European countries and among men in Germany, but inequalities in lung cancer risk were reverse (RIIs < 1) among women in Southern European countries. Inequalities differed by histological type. Adjustment for smoking reduced inequalities similarly for all histological types and among men and women in all regions. In all analysis, further adjustment for fruit and vegetable consumption did not change the estimates. CONCLUSION: Self-reported smoking consistently explains approximately 50% of the inequalities in lung cancer risk due to differences in education.
Authors: A J van Loon; R A Goldbohm; I J Kant; G M Swaen; A M Kremer; P A van den Brandt Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Victor Kipnis; Amy F Subar; Douglas Midthune; Laurence S Freedman; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Richard P Troiano; Sheila Bingham; Dale A Schoeller; Arthur Schatzkin; Raymond J Carroll Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2003-07-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: A E Cavelaars; A E Kunst; J J Geurts; R Crialesi; L Grötvedt; U Helmert; E Lahelma; O Lundberg; J Matheson; A Mielck; N K Rasmussen; E Regidor; M do Rosário-Giraldes; T Spuhler; J P Mackenbach Journal: BMJ Date: 2000-04-22
Authors: Halla Skuladottir; Anne Tjoenneland; Kim Overvad; Connie Stripp; Jane Christensen; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Jørgen H Olsen Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Karen Steindorf; Christine Friedenreich; Jakob Linseisen; Sabine Rohrmann; Andrew Rundle; Fabrizio Veglia; Paolo Vineis; Nina Fønns Johnsen; Anne Tjønneland; Kim Overvad; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Mandy Schulz; Heiner Boeing; Antonia Trichopoulou; Victoria Kalapothaki; Maria Koliva; Vittorio Krogh; Domenico Palli; Rosario Tumino; Salvatore Panico; Evelyn Monninkhof; Petra H Peeters; Hendriek C Boshuizen; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Maria-Dolores Chirlaque; Antonio Agudo; Nerea Larrañaga; José R Quirós; Carmen Martínez; Aurelio Barricarte; Lars Janzon; Göran Berglund; Sheila Bingham; Kay-Tee Khaw; Timothy J Key; Teresa Norat; Mazda Jenab; Anne Cust; Elio Riboli Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Bruna Galobardes; Mary Shaw; Debbie A Lawlor; John W Lynch; George Davey Smith Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Gwenn Menvielle; Thérèse Truong; Fatima Jellouli; Isabelle Stücker; Hermann Brenner; John K Field; H Dean Hosgood; Qing Lan; Maria Teresa Landi; Rayjean J Hung; Philip Lazarus; John McLaughlin; Hal Morgenstern; Joshua E Muscat; Alberto Ruano-Ravina; Ann G Schwartz; Adeline Seow; Margaret R Spitz; Adonina Tardon; Zuo-Feng Zhang; Danièle Luce Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Dan Lewer; Martin McKee; Antonio Gasparrini; Aaron Reeves; Cesar de Oliveira Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Gwenn Menvielle; Hendriek Boshuizen; Anton E Kunst; Paolo Vineis; Susanne O Dalton; Manuela M Bergmann; Silke Hermann; Fabrizio Veglia; Pietro Ferrari; Kim Overvad; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Anne Tjønneland; Rudolf Kaaks; Jakob Linseisen; Domenico Palli; Vittorio Krogh; Rosario Tumino; Laudina Rodriguez; Antonio Agudo; Maria-José Sánchez; Jone Miren Altzibar Arozena; Lluis Cirera; Eva Ardanaz; Sheila Bingham; Kay-Tee Khaw; Paolo Boffetta; Eric Duell; Nadia Slimani; Valentina Gallo; Elio Riboli; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Vicente Zanon-Moreno; Jose J Garcia-Medina; Vicente Zanon-Viguer; Maria A Moreno-Nadal; Maria D Pinazo-Duran Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2009-12-31 Impact factor: 2.367