Gwenn Menvielle1, Julien Dugas2,3, Jeanna-Eve Franck4, Matthieu Carton5, Brigitte Trétarre6, Isabelle Stücker7, Danièle Luce2,3. 1. INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'épidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP UMRS 1136), Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Paris, France. gwenn.menvielle@inserm.fr. 2. INSERM, U 1085_IRSET, Pointe-À-Pitre, France. 3. University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France. 4. INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'épidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP UMRS 1136), Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Paris, France. 5. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, DRCI, Biométriesaint-Cloud, France. 6. Cancer Registry Hérault, ICM Montpellier, Montpellier, France. 7. UVSQ, CESP, INSERM, Environmental Epidemiology of Cancer Team, University Paris Sud, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at investigating the associations between occupational prestige trajectories and lung and head and neck (HN) cancer risk and to assess to what extent smoking, alcohol drinking, and occupational exposures contribute to these associations. METHODS: Using data from the ICARE case-control study (controls (2676 men/715 women), lung cancers (2019 men/558 women), HN cancers (1793 men/305 women), we defined occupational prestige trajectories using group-based modeling of longitudinal data. We conducted logistic regression models. RESULTS: Among men, a gradient was observed from the downward "low to very low" trajectory to the stable very high trajectory. The associations were reduced when adjusting for tobacco and alcohol consumption and occupational exposures. Among women, when compared to the stable high trajectory, there was an increased cancer risk in all trajectories. The associations remained globally unchanged or even increased after adjustment for tobacco and alcohol consumption and did not change when adjusting for occupational exposures. The ORs were smaller for lung than for HN cancers in men. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational prestige trajectory is strongly associated with lung and HN cancer risk in men and women.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at investigating the associations between occupational prestige trajectories and lung and head and neck (HN) cancer risk and to assess to what extent smoking, alcohol drinking, and occupational exposures contribute to these associations. METHODS: Using data from the ICARE case-control study (controls (2676 men/715 women), lung cancers (2019 men/558 women), HN cancers (1793 men/305 women), we defined occupational prestige trajectories using group-based modeling of longitudinal data. We conducted logistic regression models. RESULTS: Among men, a gradient was observed from the downward "low to very low" trajectory to the stable very high trajectory. The associations were reduced when adjusting for tobacco and alcohol consumption and occupational exposures. Among women, when compared to the stable high trajectory, there was an increased cancer risk in all trajectories. The associations remained globally unchanged or even increased after adjustment for tobacco and alcohol consumption and did not change when adjusting for occupational exposures. The ORs were smaller for lung than for HN cancers in men. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational prestige trajectory is strongly associated with lung and HN cancer risk in men and women.
Authors: N Schmeisser; D I Conway; P A McKinney; A D McMahon; H Pohlabeln; M Marron; S Benhamou; C Bouchardy; G J Macfarlane; T V Macfarlane; P Lagiou; A Lagiou; V Bencko; I Holcátová; F Merletti; L Richiardi; K Kjaerheim; A Agudo; R Talamini; J Polesel; C Canova; L Simonato; R Lowry; A Znaor; C Healy; B E McCarten; M Hashibe; P Brennan; W Ahrens Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2010-02-09 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: J Ferlay; E Steliarova-Foucher; J Lortet-Tieulent; S Rosso; J W W Coebergh; H Comber; D Forman; F Bray Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Halla Skuladottir; Anne Tjoenneland; Kim Overvad; Connie Stripp; Jane Christensen; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Jørgen H Olsen Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: D I Conway; P A McKinney; A D McMahon; W Ahrens; N Schmeisser; S Benhamou; C Bouchardy; G J Macfarlane; T V Macfarlane; P Lagiou; P Minaki; V Bencko; I Holcátová; F Merletti; L Richiardi; K Kjaerheim; A Agudo; X Castellsague; R Talamini; L Barzan; C Canova; L Simonato; R J Lowry; A Znaor; C M Healy; B E McCartan; M Marron; M Hashibe; P Brennan Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-10-24 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Elisenda Renteria; Linda Sharp; Elisabete Weiderpass; Harry Comber; Paul Baas; Freddie Bray; Jan Willem Coebergh; Isabelle Soerjomataram Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-11-20 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Bruna Galobardes; Mary Shaw; Debbie A Lawlor; John W Lynch; George Davey Smith Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: A Papadopoulos; F Guida; K Leffondré; S Cénée; D Cyr; A Schmaus; L Radoï; S Paget-Bailly; M Carton; G Menvielle; A-S Woronoff; B Tretarre; D Luce; I Stücker Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-01-14 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Jan Hovanec; Jack Siemiatycki; David I Conway; Ann Olsson; Pascal Guenel; Danièle Luce; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Hermann Pohlabeln; Wolfgang Ahrens; Stefan Karrasch; Heinz-Erich Wichmann; Per Gustavsson; Dario Consonni; Franco Merletti; Lorenzo Richiardi; Simonato Lorenzo; Cristina Fortes; Marie-Élise Parent; John R McLaughlin; Paul Demers; Maria Teresa Landi; Neil Caporaso; Guillermo Fernández-Tardón; David Zaridze; Beata Świątkowska; Tamas Pándics; Jolanta Lissowska; Eleonora Fabianova; John K Field; Dana Mates; Vladimir Bencko; Lenka Foretova; Vladimir Janout; Hans Kromhout; Roel Vermeulen; Paolo Boffetta; Kurt Straif; Joachim Schüz; Swaantje Casjens; Beate Pesch; Thomas Brüning; Thomas Behrens Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 5.024