Literature DB >> 19242738

Differences in endplate deformation of the adjacent and augmented vertebra following cement augmentation.

Paul A Hulme1, S K Boyd, P F Heini, S J Ferguson.   

Abstract

Vertebral cement augmentation can restore the stiffness and strength of a fractured vertebra and relieve chronic pain. Previous finite element analysis, biomechanical tests and clinical studies have indirectly associated new adjacent vertebral fractures following augmentation to altered loading. The aim of this repeated measures in situ biomechanical study was to determine the changes in the adjacent and augmented endplate deformation following cement augmentation of human cadaveric functional spine units (FSU) using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). The surrounding soft tissue and posterior elements of 22 cadaveric human FSU were removed. FSU were assigned to two groups, control (n = 8) (loaded on day 1 and day 2) and augmented (n = 14) (loaded on day 1, augmented 20% cement fill, and loaded on day 2). The augmented group was further subdivided into a prophylactic augmentation group (n = 9), and vertebrae which spontaneously fractured during loading on day 1 (n = 5). The FSU were axially loaded (200, 1,000, 1,500-2,000 N) within a custom made radiolucent, saline filled loading device. At each loading step, FSUs were scanned using the micro-CT. Endplate heights were determined using custom software. No significant increase in endplate deformation following cement augmentation was noted for the adjacent endplate (P > 0.05). The deformation of the augmented endplate was significantly reduced following cement augmentation for both the prophylactic and fracture group (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, respectively). Endplate deformation of the controls showed no statistically significant differences between loading on day 1 and day 2. A linear relationship was noted between the applied compressive load and endplate deflection (R (2) = 0.58). Evidence of significant endplate deformation differences between unaugmented and augmented FSU, while evident for the augmented endplate, was not present for the adjacent endplate. This non-invasive micro-CT method may also be useful to investigate endplate failure, and parameters that predict vertebral failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19242738      PMCID: PMC3234009          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0910-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  54 in total

1.  Subvoxel processing: a method for reducing partial volume blurring with application to in vivo MR images of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Scott N Hwang; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Vertebroplasty in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Hervé Deramond; John M Mathis
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Kyphoplasty for vertebral compression fractures: 1-year clinical outcomes from a prospective study.

Authors:  Jean-Valéry C E Coumans; Mary-Kay Reinhardt; Isador H Lieberman
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Midterm outcome after vertebroplasty: predictive value of technical and patient-related factors.

Authors:  Juerg Hodler; Dallas Peck; Louis A Gilula
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: indications, contraindications, and technique.

Authors:  W C G Peh; L A Gilula
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  The effect of vertebral body percentage fill on mechanical behavior during percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Sean Molloy; John M Mathis; Stephen M Belkoff
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The effect of cement augmentation on the load transfer in an osteoporotic functional spinal unit: finite-element analysis.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Lutz Peter Nolte; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Occurrence of new vertebral body fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Anita A Uppin; Joshua A Hirsch; Luis V Centenera; Bernard A Pfiefer; Artemis G Pazianos; In Sup Choi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Vertebral compression fractures: pain reduction and improvement in functional mobility after percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty retrospective report of 245 cases.

Authors:  Avery J Evans; Mary E Jensen; Kevin E Kip; Andrew J DeNardo; Gregory J Lawler; Geoffrey A Negin; Kent B Remley; Selene M Boutin; Steven A Dunnagan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty. A biomechanical investigation.

Authors:  U Berlemann; S J Ferguson; L P Nolte; P F Heini
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-07
View more
  11 in total

1.  The effect of standard and low-modulus cement augmentation on the stiffness, strength, and endplate pressure distribution in vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Kinzl; Lorin M Benneker; Andreas Boger; Philippe K Zysset; Dieter H Pahr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Stabilization of the osteoporotic spine from a biomechanical viewpoint].

Authors:  C-E Heyde; A Rohlmann; U Weber; R Kayser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  A probabilistic finite element analysis of the stresses in the augmented vertebral body after vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Hadi Nabil Boustani; Georg Bergmann; Thomas Zander
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  [Biomechanical aspects of vertebral augmentation].

Authors:  H-J Wilke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Secondary balloon kyphoplasty for new vertebral compression fracture after initial single-level balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Dawei Song; Bin Meng; Guangdong Chen; Junjie Niu; Weimin Jiang; Zongping Luo; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The role of patient-mode high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography indices in the prediction of failure strength of the elderly women's thoracic vertebral body.

Authors:  Y Lu; M Krause; N Bishop; K Sellenschloh; C-C Glüer; K Püschel; M Amling; M M Morlock; G Huber
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty Can Restore Normal Spine Mechanics following Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture.

Authors:  Jin Luo; Michael A Adams; Patricia Dolan
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2010-06-20

8.  The clinical effect of percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of multiple osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and the prevention of new vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Weifeng Zhai; Yongwei Jia; Jianjie Wang; Liming Cheng; Zhili Zeng; Yan Yu; Lei Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

9.  The early stage adjacent disc degeneration after percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic VCFs.

Authors:  Jun Qian; Huilin Yang; Juehua Jing; Hong Zhao; Li Ni; Dasheng Tian; Zhengfei Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Radiological and clinical outcomes of balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Ji Guo; Weifeng Zhai; Licheng Wei; Jianpo Zhang; Lang Jin; Hao Yan; Zheng Huang; Yongwei Jia
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.