Literature DB >> 19242392

Evaluation of the buccal vestibule-palatal diffusion of 4% articaine hydrochloride in impacted maxillary third molar extractions.

José-Lacet Lima-Júnior1, Eduardo Dias-Ribeiro, Túlio-Neves de Araújo, Julierme Ferreira-Rocha, Evaldo-Sales Honfi-Júnior, Carlos-Frederico de Moraes Sarmento, Flávio-Roberto-Guerra Seabra, Maria do Socorro-Cirilo de Sousa.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the vestibular-palatal diffusion of 4% Articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 and 1:200,000, in impacted maxillary third molar extractions, without palatal injection. MATERIALS AND
METHOD: Two hundred teeth were selected from patients age 15 to 46. Patients were divided into 4 groups: 1A, were anesthetized with 4% articaine 1:100,000 and the surgery was initiated 5 minutes following anesthesia. 1B, used 4% articaine 1:100,000 but the surgery was started 10 minutes after anesthesia. 2A, used 4% articaine 1:200,000 the surgery was started 5 minutes after. 2B, used 4% articaine 1:200,000 but 10 minutes was allowed for anesthetic diffusion before the initiation of in groups (50 extractions each) only buccal vestibule anesthesia was initially administered (i.e. no palatal injections were used).
RESULTS: The rate of sufficient vestibule-palatal diffusion, as determined by the lack of necessity of supplemental palatal anesthesia, was: 1A(84%), 1B(98%), 2A(78%), 2B(82%). Chi-square (Chi2) and residual analyses showed that a higher vestibule-palatal diffusion was obtained using 4% articaine 1:100,000 with a period of 10 minutes (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Most of the extractions could be performed only with vestibule anesthesia. However, vasoconstrictor concentration and the time interval between administration of the anesthetic and initiation of surgery did influence buccal vestibule-palatal diffusion of 4% articaine in the extraction models used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19242392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal        ISSN: 1698-4447


  21 in total

1.  Clinical use of an epinephrine-reduced (1/400,000) articaine solution in short-time dental routine treatments--a multicenter study.

Authors:  Monika Daubländer; Peer W Kämmerer; Brita Willershausen; Michael Leckel; Hans-Christoph Lauer; Siegmar Buff; Benita Rösl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Anesthetic Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration Articaine versus Lidocaine for Extraction of Primary Molar Teeth.

Authors:  Nilesh V Rathi; Anushree A Khatri; Akshat G Agrawal; Sudhindra Baliga M; Nilima R Thosar; Shravani G Deolia
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2019

3.  Maxillary posterior teeth removal without palatal injection -truth or myth: a dilemma for oral surgeons.

Authors:  Kopal Sharma; Amit Sharma; Ml Aseri; Angelika Batta; Vikas Singh; Dinesh Pilania; Yogesh Kumar Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-11-20

4.  Extraction of mandibular premolars and molars: comparison between local infiltration via pressure syringe and inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia.

Authors:  Daniel G E Thiem; Florian Schnaith; Caroline M E Van Aken; Anne Köntges; Vinay V Kumar; Bilal Al-Nawas; Peer W Kämmerer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Comparison of the effectiveness of lidocaine in permanent maxillary teeth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection.

Authors:  Ramesh Kumaresan; Balamanikanda Srinivasan; Sivakumar Pendayala
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-04-27

6.  Efficacy and safety of intraseptal and periodontal ligament anesthesia achieved by computer-controlled articaine + epinephrine delivery: a dose-finding study.

Authors:  Vladimir Biocanin; Bozidar Brkovic; Biljana Milicic; Dragica Stojic
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Efficacy of 4 % Articaine and 2 % Lidocaine: A clinical study.

Authors:  Deepashri H Kambalimath; R S Dolas; H V Kambalimath; S M Agrawal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-04-05

8.  Patient's pain perception during mandibular molar extraction with articaine: a comparison study between infiltration and inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  Anwar B Bataineh; Majid A Alwarafi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 2 and 4 % articaine in inferior alveolar nerve block for tooth extraction-a double-blinded randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  P W Kämmerer; D Schneider; V Palarie; E Schiegnitz; M Daubländer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Comparison of buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with 1 : 100,000 and 1 : 200,000 epinephrine for extraction of maxillary third molars with pericoronitis: a pilot study.

Authors:  José Lacet Lima; Eduardo Dias-Ribeiro; Julierme Ferreira-Rocha; Ramon Soares; Fábio Wildson Gurgel Costa; Song Fan; Eduardo Sant'ana
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.