Literature DB >> 21861074

Clinical use of an epinephrine-reduced (1/400,000) articaine solution in short-time dental routine treatments--a multicenter study.

Monika Daubländer1, Peer W Kämmerer, Brita Willershausen, Michael Leckel, Hans-Christoph Lauer, Siegmar Buff, Benita Rösl.   

Abstract

The addition of epinephrine in dental local anaesthesia results in a longer and deeper anaesthesia under almost ischemic conditions. For short-time dental treatments, epinephrine-reduced anaesthetics may offer shorter and more individual anaesthesia with reduced potential side effects. The aim of this study was a clinical evaluation of anaesthetic potency and adverse effects of an epinephrine-reduced articaine formulation in dental patients undergoing short-time routine treatment. In a prospective clinical, not interventional, study between January 2008 and February 2009, 908 patients undergoing short-time dental treatment in five medical centers were anaesthetized with 4% articaine 1:400,000 epinephrine (Ubistesin, 3M/ESPE, Seefeld, Germany). Efficacy and safety in clinical use were evaluated. A follow-up after 1 day was conducted by telephone survey. A mean amount of 1.3-ml anaesthetic solution was needed to achieve a complete or sufficient anaesthesia in 97% (n = 876) of cases. A second injection had to be done in 3.7% (n = 34) before and in 11.9% (n = 108) during treatment. Here, the second injection had to be applied after a mean of 48.6 min. The mean duration of soft tissue anaesthesia after infiltration was 146.6 min, after nerve block 187.7 min. The painful treatment took a mean of 50.2 min and the total treatment time summed up to 68.8 min. In 1.7% cases (n = 15), unwanted side effects were observed. The results indicate that a lower concentration of epinephrine in combination with the 4% articaine solution leads to a high success rate of efficacy. The clinical use of a 4% articaine 1:400,000 epinephrine solution can be stated as safe and effective in short dental routine treatments. Reconsiderations concerning limitations of indication or additional contraindications are not necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21861074     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-011-0608-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  35 in total

1.  A comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis.

Authors:  Isabel Peixoto Tortamano; Marcelo Siviero; Carina Gisele Costa; Inês Aparecida Buscariolo; Paschoal Laércio Armonia
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 2.  Vasoconstrictor agents for local anesthesia.

Authors:  J A Yagiela
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1995

3.  Plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine with and without adrenaline following caudal anaesthesia in infants.

Authors:  T G Hansen; N S Morton; P M Cullen; D G Watson
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.105

4.  Effectivity of a new local analgesic Hoe 40 045.

Authors:  J E Winther; B Nathalang
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1972

5.  Clinical evaluation of the use of three anesthetics in endodontics.

Authors:  Cláudio Maniglia-Ferreira; Fábio Almeida-Gomes; Bruno Carvalho-Sousa; Antonio V H Barbosa; Carla C S A Lins; Fabrício D Souza; Roberto A Santos
Journal:  Acta Odontol Latinoam       Date:  2009

6.  Epinephrine concentration (1:100,000 or 1:200,000) does not affect the clinical efficacy of 4% articaine for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.

Authors:  Carlos F Santos; Karin C S Modena; Fernando P M Giglio; Vivien T Sakai; Adriana M Calvo; Bella L Colombini; Carla R Sipert; Thiago J Dionísio; Flávio A C Faria; Alceu S Trindade; José R P Lauris
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Effect of local epinephrine on cutaneous bloodflow in the human neck.

Authors:  T P O'Malley; G N Postma; M Holtel; D A Girod
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  The efficacy of six local anesthetic formulations used for posterior mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia.

Authors:  Mohammad Abdulwahab; Sean Boynes; Paul Moore; Shahrooz Seifikar; Abdulaziz Al-Jazzaf; Abdullah Alshuraidah; Jayme Zovko; John Close
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.634

9.  Articaine infiltration for anesthesia of mandibular first molars.

Authors:  Ian P Corbett; Mohammad D Kanaa; John M Whitworth; John G Meechan
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.171

10.  [Articaine and adrenaline combinations efficacy for dental anesthesia].

Authors:  A Zh Petrikas; V A Egorova; K V Ermilova
Journal:  Stomatologiia (Mosk)       Date:  2009
View more
  8 in total

1.  Movement control during aspiration with different injection systems via video monitoring-an in vitro model.

Authors:  P W Kämmerer; D Schneider; A A Pacyna; M Daubländer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparative clinical evaluation of different epinephrine concentrations in 4% articaine for dental local infiltration anesthesia.

Authors:  P W Kämmerer; J Seeling; A Alshihri; M Daubländer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Periodontal intraligament injection as alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block--meta-analysis of the literature from 1979 to 2012.

Authors:  N Shabazfar; M Daubländer; B Al-Nawas; P W Kämmerer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Intraosseous anaesthesia in children with 4 % articaine and epinephrine 1:400,000 using computer-assisted systems.

Authors:  J-L Sixou; A Marie-Cousin
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2015-08-08

5.  Tracking local anesthetic effects using a novel perceptual reference approach.

Authors:  Dominik A Ettlin; Nenad Lukic; Jetmir Abazi; Sonja Widmayer; Michael L Meier
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 2 and 4 % articaine in inferior alveolar nerve block for tooth extraction-a double-blinded randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  P W Kämmerer; D Schneider; V Palarie; E Schiegnitz; M Daubländer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Evaluation of the anesthetic effect of epinephrine-free articaine and mepivacaine through quantitative sensory testing.

Authors:  Sareh Said Yekta-Michael; Jamal M Stein; Ernst Marioth-Wirtz
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Epinephrine-reduced articaine solution (1:400,000) in paediatric dentistry: a multicentre non-interventional clinical trial.

Authors:  P W Kämmerer; N Krämer; J Esch; H Pfau; U Uhlemann; L Piehlmeier; M Daubländer
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2013-04-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.